Skip to content

Conversation

@FernandoKGA
Copy link
Contributor

Closes #344.

@FernandoKGA
Copy link
Contributor Author

@camilonova and @Mogost , could you guys take a look? In my opinion it solves the issue, not inside the Config as mentioned, but definitely a use case that I would particularly appreciate to reduce database access.

@Natim
Copy link
Contributor

Natim commented Jan 13, 2025

The PR looks good to me, both comments are just nits

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 13, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 84.67%. Comparing base (1451943) to head (52979b2).
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #607      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   84.23%   84.67%   +0.43%     
==========================================
  Files          21       21              
  Lines         736      744       +8     
  Branches      117      121       +4     
==========================================
+ Hits          620      630      +10     
+ Misses         83       82       -1     
+ Partials       33       32       -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@Mogost Mogost merged commit 745fb6f into jazzband:master Jan 14, 2025
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Improvement] Option for multiget values

3 participants