Skip to content

Issues with _types #180

New issue
New issue
Closed
Closed
Issues with _types#180
Assignees
henrifroese
Labels
bugSomething isn't working
@jbesomi

Description

@jbesomi
jbesomi
opened on Sep 8, 2020
  • Fix type checks to not fail if first value in series is NaN/missing, see Fix type checks to not fail if first value in series is NaN/missing. #174
  • We don't need anymore to check for RepresentationSeries
  • Then we might not need to check for the number of levels .. or s.index.nlevels != 1? Or if we do we should have a separate warning message "number of level is too high ..."
  • At line 163 of _types is written: "Check if a given Pandas Series has the properties of a RepresentationSeries.". Shouldn't we check for VectorSeries instead?
  • Some new representation functions might accept as input both a DataFrame and a VectorSeries. Does InputSeries deal with that? Do we need a more general approach?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

bugSomething isn't working

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions