Skip to content

Conversation

@natasha41575
Copy link
Contributor

@natasha41575 natasha41575 commented Aug 29, 2025

What type of PR is this?

/kind feature

What this PR does / why we need it:

Self nominate natasha41575 to be a sig-node reviewer.

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

NONE

Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.:

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. labels Aug 29, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

This issue is currently awaiting triage.

If a SIG or subproject determines this is a relevant issue, they will accept it by applying the triage/accepted label and provide further guidance.

The triage/accepted label can be added by org members by writing /triage accepted in a comment.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. area/kubelet area/test sig/node Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Node. labels Aug 29, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the sig/testing Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Testing. label Aug 29, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. label Aug 29, 2025
@natasha41575
Copy link
Contributor Author

@dchen1107
Copy link
Member

dchen1107 commented Aug 29, 2025

+1

Thanks for all your hard work. cc / @mrunalp @haircommander @derekwaynecarr

@haircommander
Copy link
Contributor

easy +1, great work here
/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 29, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: 95dbb449c8172f90f4d3f210cbd5c903f16de820

@natasha41575
Copy link
Contributor Author

@haircommander @dchen1107 I had a chat with @tallclair who suggested I just make my self a top-level sig-node reviewer. WDYT?

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@natasha41575: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
pull-kubernetes-unit-windows-master e153839 link false /test pull-kubernetes-unit-windows-master

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@haircommander
Copy link
Contributor

even better, I agree you qualify for that as well

@tallclair
Copy link
Member

tallclair commented Aug 29, 2025

Yes, read over the criteria, and it looks like you meet everything for sig-node-reviewer. +1 from me.

44 sig-node PRs reviewed: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pulls?q=is%3Apr+reviewed-by%3Anatasha41575+is%3Aclosed+label%3Asig%2Fnode

EDIT: I'll also add that @natasha41575's attention to detail in reviews has been great, and she's caught several big issues that I missed on PRs that we both reviewed.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Aug 29, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Aug 29, 2025
@natasha41575 natasha41575 changed the title self-nominate natasha41575 as reviewer for pod resize subpackages self-nominate natasha41575 to be a sig-node reviewer Aug 29, 2025
@natasha41575
Copy link
Contributor Author

Okay thanks all :) I updated the PR to make myself a sig-node reviewer, updated the description accordingly.

@haircommander
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 29, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: d3079b24e1603cfcfb536a2504352c9a4197fb36

@ffromani
Copy link
Contributor

+1 for top level reviewer and of course in general. Great work @natasha41575 , good to have you in sig-node!

@dims
Copy link
Member

dims commented Sep 1, 2025

/approve

welcome @natasha41575

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dims, natasha41575

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Sep 1, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 8766e51 into kubernetes:master Sep 2, 2025
13 checks passed
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.35 milestone Sep 2, 2025
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Triage to Done in SIG Node CI/Test Board Sep 2, 2025
@natasha41575 natasha41575 deleted the reviewer branch September 2, 2025 15:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/kubelet area/test cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. sig/node Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Node. sig/testing Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Testing. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants