Skip to content

Conversation

@tallclair
Copy link
Member

What type of PR is this?
/kind bug

What this PR does / why we need it:

This reverts commit 26e3c86 from #76665

The change broke the detection of user ID.

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

Fix broken detection of non-root image user ID

/sig node
/assign @yujuhong
/priority critical-urgent

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. sig/node Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Node. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. priority/critical-urgent Highest priority. Must be actively worked on as someone's top priority right now. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels May 23, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested review from dashpole and sjpotter May 23, 2019 18:42
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: tallclair

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label May 23, 2019
@tallclair tallclair mentioned this pull request May 23, 2019
@yujuhong
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 23, 2019
@fejta-bot
Copy link

/retest
This bot automatically retries jobs that failed/flaked on approved PRs (send feedback to fejta).

Review the full test history for this PR.

Silence the bot with an /lgtm cancel or /hold comment for consistent failures.

@mattjmcnaughton
Copy link
Contributor

/test pull-kubernetes-kubemark-e2e-gce-big
/lgtm

@b0b0haha
Copy link

Why getImageUser ruturn uid=0 as default ? It may be uninsecure for most time.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/kubelet area/security cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. priority/critical-urgent Highest priority. Must be actively worked on as someone's top priority right now. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. sig/node Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Node. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants