Please address the comments from this code review:

## Overall Comments
- In `Layer`, there are multiple fields that represent a name (`name`, `layerName`, and `metadata.name`); consider consolidating or clearly distinguishing their responsibilities to avoid ambiguity and inconsistent usage later.
- The `LayerDetector` class mixes query-based and label-based detection fields in a single type; introducing an explicit discriminator (e.g., an enum detector type or separate subclasses) would make it harder to create invalid combinations and simplify downstream logic.
- In `LayerPresence#getActiveDetectors`, consider returning `Collections.emptyList()` instead of allocating a new `ArrayList` on the empty case to reduce unnecessary allocations.

## Individual Comments

### Comment 1
<location> `src/main/java/com/autotune/analyzer/kruizeLayer/Layer.java:24` </location>
<code_context>
+    private String details;
+    @SerializedName("layer_presence")
+    private LayerPresence layerPresence;
+    private List<LayerTunable> tunables;
+
+
</code_context>

<issue_to_address>
**suggestion:** Consider default-initializing `tunables` to an empty list to reduce null-handling overhead.

As it stands, `tunables` may be `null` when using the no-arg constructor or when deserialization omits the field, forcing callers to add null checks before iterating or adding elements. Initializing it to `Collections.emptyList()` or a mutable empty list (if mutation is expected) makes the type safer to consume and avoids this extra defensive code.

Suggested implementation:

```java
import com.google.gson.annotations.SerializedName;

import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.Map;

```

```java
    @SerializedName("layer_level")
    private Integer layerLevel;
    private String details;
    @SerializedName("layer_presence")
    private LayerPresence layerPresence;
    private List<LayerTunable> tunables = new ArrayList<>();

```
</issue_to_address>

### Comment 2
<location> `src/main/java/com/autotune/analyzer/kruizeLayer/LayerPresence.java:61-68` </location>
<code_context>
+     * Returns the active list of detectors regardless of whether
+     * they came from 'label' or 'queries'.
+     */
+    public List<LayerDetector> getActiveDetectors() {
+        if (labels != null && !labels.isEmpty()) {
+            return labels;
+        }
+        if (queries != null && !queries.isEmpty()) {
+            return queries;
+        }
+        return new java.util.ArrayList<>(); // Return empty list to prevent NullPointerExceptions
+    }
+
</code_context>

<issue_to_address>
**suggestion:** Align `getActiveDetectors` behavior and consider returning an unmodifiable or shared empty list.

Currently, when `labels`/`queries` are non-empty you return the backing list, but when both are empty you return a new mutable list unrelated to the object’s state. That semantic mismatch can be confusing. Consider returning `Collections.emptyList()` (or another unmodifiable view) to avoid extra allocations and make it clear the result should be treated as read-only and not used for in-place updates.

Suggested implementation:

```java
import com.google.gson.annotations.SerializedName;

import java.util.Collections;
import java.util.List;

```

```java
    /**
     * Returns the active list of detectors regardless of whether
     * they came from 'label' or 'queries'.
     * <p>
     * When no detectors are present, this returns a shared, unmodifiable empty list.
     */
    public List<LayerDetector> getActiveDetectors() {
        if (labels != null && !labels.isEmpty()) {
            return labels;
        }
        if (queries != null && !queries.isEmpty()) {
            return queries;
        }
        // Return a shared unmodifiable empty list to avoid allocations and clarify read-only semantics
        return Collections.emptyList();
    }


```
</issue_to_address>