Skip to content

Mark QC-failing reads instead of skipping them#4

Closed
dawe wants to merge 2 commits into
lh3:masterfrom
dawe:master
Closed

Mark QC-failing reads instead of skipping them#4
dawe wants to merge 2 commits into
lh3:masterfrom
dawe:master

Conversation

@dawe

@dawe dawe commented Aug 17, 2011

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Modified QC behavior for bwa. Instead of skipping lines, just mark them as QC-failing.
I've noticed that bitwise flag for SAM output is only 8-bit long, whereas SAM specs say 10-bits.
I've shortened the len of seq in bwa_seq_t struct to 18 (should be sufficientg for many years to come) and increased extra_flag from 8 bits to 10 bits.

dawe added 2 commits August 17, 2011 12:19
…em as QC-failing.

I've noticed that bitwise flag for SAM output is only 8-bit long, whereas SAM specs say 10-bits.
I've shortened the len of seq in bwa_seq_t struct to 18 (should be sufficientg for many years to come) and increased extra_flag from 8 bits to 10 bits
@dawe

dawe commented Aug 17, 2011

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Actually the second commit (about barcodes) was not part of the original pull request and it should not be considered...

@lh3

lh3 commented Oct 12, 2011

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

I will keep the original bwa code. It should not make a big difference. Thank you anyway for contributing the patches.

@lh3 lh3 closed this Oct 12, 2011
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants