Skip to content

Conversation

@ispmgr-team
Copy link

@ispmgr-team ispmgr-team commented Oct 29, 2025

Public Suffix List (PSL) Submission

Checklist of required steps

  • Description of Organization

  • Robust Reason for PSL Inclusion

  • DNS verification via dig

  • Each domain listed in the PRIVATE section has and shall maintain at least two years remaining on registration, and we shall keep the _psl TXT record in place in the respective zone(s).

Submitter affirms the following:

  • We are listing any third-party limits that we seek to work around in our rationale such as those between IOS 14.5+ and Facebook (see Issue #1245 as a well-documented example)
  • This request was not submitted with the objective of working around other third-party limits.
  • The submitter acknowledges that it is their responsibility to maintain the domains within their section. This includes removing names which are no longer used, retaining the _psl DNS entry, and responding to e-mails to the supplied address. Failure to maintain entries may result in removal of individual entries or the entire section.
  • The Guidelines were carefully read and understood, and this request conforms to them.
  • The submission follows the guidelines on formatting and sorting.
  • A role-based email address has been used and this inbox is actively monitored with a response time of no more than 30 days.

Abuse Contact:


For PRIVATE section requests that are submitting entries for domains that match their organization website's primary domain, please understand that this can have impacts that may not match the desired outcome and take a long time to rollback, if at all.

To ensure that requested changes are entirely intentional, make sure that you read the affectation and propagation expectations, that you understand them, and confirm this understanding.

PR Rollbacks have lower priority, and the volunteers are unable to control when or if browsers or other parties using the PSL will refresh or update.

(Link: about propagation/expectations)

  • Yes, I understand. I could break my organization's website cookies and cause other issues, and the rollback timing is acceptable. Proceed anyways.

Description of Organization

Ispmanager is a software development company whose flagship product is ispmanager — a control panel for servers and websites used by hosting providers worldwide.
This request is submitted by the infrastructure team, which is responsible for maintaining the company’s infrastructure, DNS, mail and other services, and also handles security-related requests.

Organization Website:
https://www.ispmanager.com/

Reason for PSL Inclusion

We are preparing a managed subdomain service for ispmanager users under ispmanager.name.
Each user will be assigned a dedicated subdomain that provides access to hosting resources and enables immediate availability of their websites and control panel.
All DNS and infrastructure operations are handled automatically by our platform to ensure reliability and security.
We also want our clients’ websites to be logically isolated from each other in modern browsers — for example, in handling cookies
The service is designed for large-scale use and is expected to serve around 30,000 active subdomains per month after launch.

Number of users this request is being made to serve: 30,000 subdomains per month (estimated)

DNS Verification

# dig +short txt _psl.ispmanager.name          
"https://github.com/publicsuffix/list/pull/2638"

@groundcat
Copy link
Contributor

  • Expiration (Note: Must STAY >2y at all times)
    • ispmanager.name - 2028-06-17
  • Reasoning/Organization description
    • Quantity of user 30000 supports relevance requirements
    • Organizational website info matches PR description
    • Use case meets PSL requirements; not bypassing third-party limits
  • Non-personal email address
  • Abuse contact - Listed at https://ispmanager.name

Hello @ispmgr-team To ensure that this pull request is genuinely from Ispmanager, could you please provide some documentation, such as information about using the ispmanager.name domain on your official website, https://www.ispmanager.com/? Alternatively, you can send an email to one of the maintainers, such as @simon-friedberger, from your organization's @ispmanager.com email.

I sometimes use Ispmanager so I am confident that the number of users and the use case qualify for PSL inclusion. I just want to confirm that this submission is indeed from Ispmanager. Thank you.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants