Skip to content

Conversation

@jaewonlee-fb
Copy link
Contributor

Summary:
Original commit changeset: a19273017a2a

Original Phabricator Diff: D43969564


Test Plan: unlandayc

Reviewed By: terrycsy

Differential Revision: D44080273

@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Mar 15, 2023

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/96796

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit fcfe9dc:
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@linux-foundation-easycla
Copy link

linux-foundation-easycla bot commented Mar 15, 2023

CLA Signed

The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

  • ✅ login: jaewonlee-fb (9b6040530c4b8ee4ee2fc5b57e526faddb84e67a)

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D44080273

1 similar comment
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D44080273

@jaewonlee-fb jaewonlee-fb force-pushed the export-D44080273 branch 2 times, most recently from 1b84c0a to 109b4b2 Compare March 15, 2023 04:47
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D44080273

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D44080273

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D44080273

1 similar comment
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D44080273

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D44080273

@ngimel
Copy link
Collaborator

ngimel commented Mar 15, 2023

cc @akamali, looks like 32MB caching threshold is too aggressive - can you make the thresholds configurable via env vars, similarly to how it's done for cuda caching allocators?

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D44080273

jaewonlee-fb added a commit to jaewonlee-fb/pytorch that referenced this pull request Mar 15, 2023
…8GB of memory (pytorch#95827)" (pytorch#96796)

Summary:
Pull Request resolved: pytorch#96796

Original commit changeset: a19273017a2a

Original Phabricator Diff: D43969564

Parameters set too aggressively hurting some critical use cases. We should revisit this idea with more rigorous testing -- at least configurable parameters (use GFLAGs?) with conservative default values (e.g., INF for pinned memory caching size limit).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Test Plan:
This is an unland diff.

unlandayc

Reviewed By: terrycsy, banitag1, yuchenhao, liangluofb

Differential Revision: D44080273

fbshipit-source-id: ce587db7db3db4bd0ebcabdcba4c3b39fd2424c0
Copy link
Member

@jianyuh jianyuh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I will stamp to unblock and then let @akamali / @jaewonlee-fb to figure out more proper approach to land the original PR.

@jaewonlee-fb
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request label Mar 15, 2023
@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge failed

Reason: This PR needs a label
If your changes are user facing and intended to be a part of release notes, please use a label starting with release notes:.

If not, please add the topic: not user facing label.

For more information, see
https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/wiki/PyTorch-AutoLabel-Bot#why-categorize-for-release-notes-and-how-does-it-work.

Details for Dev Infra team Raised by workflow job

@jianyuh jianyuh added the release notes: cuda release notes category label Mar 15, 2023
@davidberard98 davidberard98 self-requested a review March 15, 2023 22:18
@jaewonlee-fb
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge failed

Reason: 1 jobs have failed, first few of them are: trunk / win-vs2019-cuda11.7-py3 / test (default, 3, 5, windows.g5.4xlarge.nvidia.gpu)

Details for Dev Infra team Raised by workflow job

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D44080273

…8GB of memory (pytorch#95827)" (pytorch#96796)

Summary:
Pull Request resolved: pytorch#96796

Original commit changeset: a19273017a2a

Original Phabricator Diff: D43969564

Parameters set too aggressively hurting some critical use cases. We should revisit this idea with more rigorous testing -- at least configurable parameters (use GFLAGs?) with conservative default values (e.g., INF for pinned memory caching size limit).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Test Plan:
This is an unland diff.

unlandayc

Reviewed By: terrycsy, jianyuh, banitag1, yuchenhao, liangluofb

Differential Revision: D44080273

fbshipit-source-id: 7743a8d53e5fdd11aa72843802e2abc31585211a
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D44080273

@jaewonlee-fb
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

cyyever pushed a commit to cyyever/pytorch_private that referenced this pull request Mar 23, 2023
…8GB of memory (#95827)" (#96796)

Summary:
Original commit changeset: a19273017a2a

Original Phabricator Diff: D43969564

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Test Plan: unlandayc

Reviewed By: terrycsy

Differential Revision: D44080273

Pull Request resolved: pytorch/pytorch#96796
Approved by: https://github.com/jianyuh, https://github.com/davidberard98
cyyever pushed a commit to cyyever/pytorch_private that referenced this pull request Mar 27, 2023
…8GB of memory (#95827)" (#96796)

Summary:
Original commit changeset: a19273017a2a

Original Phabricator Diff: D43969564

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Test Plan: unlandayc

Reviewed By: terrycsy

Differential Revision: D44080273

Pull Request resolved: pytorch/pytorch#96796
Approved by: https://github.com/jianyuh, https://github.com/davidberard98
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request fb-exported Merged release notes: cuda release notes category

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants