Improve shortcut performance when comparing two boolean expressions #667
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
In original sbat.c:
...
else if (preserve_sbat_uefi_variable(sbat, sbatsize, attributes,
sbat_var_candidate) &&
!reset_sbat) {
...
The time omplexity of preserve_sbat_uefi_variable() is higher than
reset_sbat. Maybe we could swap both of them to calculate reset_sbat
first. Such that the shortcut performance can be improved.
Signed-off-by: Dennis Tseng <dennis.tseng@suse.com>
vathpela
approved these changes
Jan 15, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In original sbat.c:
The time omplexity of preserve_sbat_uefi_variable() is higher than reset_sbat. Maybe we could swap both of them to calculate reset_sbat first. Such that the shortcut performance can be improved.