Skip to content

Conversation

@prince272
Copy link

Issue: #7476

Update the sorting logic to sort applications by their first category when the sort key is 'category'; otherwise, sort them by the application name.

Change-Id: I41501d3516614f0e0035ff1351dc0472d470acce

What:
Fix sorting logic to sort applications by their first category when sortKey is 'category'; otherwise, sort by name.

Why:
Fixes broken category sorting on the Applications page (Issue #7476).

Please describe the tests:

  • Test 1:
  • Test 2:

Please describe the performance impact:

Code Review Checklist (to be filled out by reviewer)

  • NEW: Are there any Satellite database migrations? Are they forwards and backwards compatible?
  • Does the PR describe what changes are being made?
  • Does the PR describe why the changes are being made?
  • Does the code follow our style guide?
  • Does the code follow our testing guide?
  • Is the PR appropriately sized? (If it could be broken into smaller PRs it should be)
  • Does the new code have enough tests? (every PR should have tests or justification otherwise. Bug-fix PRs especially)
  • Does the new code have enough documentation that answers "how do I use it?" and "what does it do?"? (both source documentation and higher level, diagrams?)
  • Does any documentation need updating?
  • Do the database access patterns make sense?

Issue: storj#7476

Update the sorting logic to sort applications by their first category when the sort key is 'category'; otherwise, sort them by the application name.

Change-Id: I41501d3516614f0e0035ff1351dc0472d470acce
@cla-bot
Copy link

cla-bot bot commented Jul 2, 2025

Thank you for your pull request and welcome to our community. We require contributors to sign our new Contributor License Agreement v2, and we don't seem to have the users @prince272 on file. Once you have signed the CLA, please let us know, so we can manually review and add you to the approved contributors list.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @prince272, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request provides a targeted fix for a bug affecting the sorting functionality on the Applications page. It refines the sorting algorithm to ensure that applications are correctly ordered based on their categories or names, improving the user experience and data presentation.

Highlights

  • Bug Fix: This pull request resolves an issue where the sorting of applications by 'category' on the Applications page was not functioning correctly. It addresses Issue #7476.
  • Sorting Logic Enhancement: The application sorting logic has been updated within the filteredApps computed property. When the sortKey is 'category', applications will now be sorted by their first assigned category. For all other sort keys, the sorting will default to using the application's name.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request updates the application sorting logic to correctly sort by the first category or by name. The change addresses the issue described.

Comment on lines 179 to 181
if (aValue < bValue) return sortOrder.value === 'asc' ? -1 : 1;
if (aValue > bValue) return sortOrder.value === 'asc' ? 1 : -1;
return 0;

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The comparison logic can be simplified by using String.prototype.localeCompare() for a more concise and idiomatic string comparison. This method is generally more robust for sorting user-visible strings as it handles international characters correctly.

        const comparison = aValue.localeCompare(bValue);
        return sortOrder.value === 'asc' ? comparison : -comparison;

@prince272
Copy link
Author

Thank you for your pull request and welcome to our community. We require contributors to sign our new Contributor License Agreement v2, and we don't seem to have the users @prince272 on file. Once you have signed the CLA, please let us know, so we can manually review and add you to the approved contributors list.

It's as been done.

@cla-bot
Copy link

cla-bot bot commented Jul 7, 2025

Thank you for your pull request and welcome to our community. We require contributors to sign our new Contributor License Agreement v2, and we don't seem to have the users @prince272 on file. Once you have signed the CLA, please let us know, so we can manually review and add you to the approved contributors list.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant