Skip to content

sambacha/eigen-py

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

Β 

History

5 Commits
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 

Repository files navigation

EigenLayer AVS Ecosystem Analysis

A comprehensive analysis of the EigenLayer Actively Validated Services (AVS) ecosystem, providing insights into market dynamics, operator networks, competitive landscape, and strategic patterns.

πŸ“Š AVS Overview

  • Total AVS: 12
  • Total AVS TVL: $57,118,183,250.17
  • Average TVL per AVS: $4,759,848,604.18

πŸ† Top 10 AVS by Total Value Locked (TVL)

Rank Name Operators Stakers TVL (USD)
1 EigenDA 258 138,789 $9,626.1M
2 eoracle 103 104,133 $6,034.7M
3 Witness Chain 74 91,487 $5,967.9M
4 Lagrange State Committees 61 83,734 $5,363.5M
5 Lagrange ZK Prover Network 47 88,870 $5,053.0M
6 OpenLayer 49 90,068 $5,018.0M
7 Brevis coChain AVS 71 89,755 $4,710.9M
8 Automata Multi-Prover AVS 64 102,029 $4,505.7M
9 Xterio Mach (Powered by AltLayer) 42 85,066 $3,576.1M
10 AltLayer MACH 42 85,066 $3,576.1M

πŸ“ˆ AVS Size Distribution

TVL Range AVS Count Total TVL Avg Operators Avg Stakers
<$1M 0 $0.0M - -
$1M-$10M 0 $0.0M - -
$10M-$100M 0 $0.0M - -
$100M-$1B 1 $477.4M 34.0 55,081
>$1B 11 $56,640.8M 78.3 94,585

πŸ”— Operator-AVS Network Analysis

  • Operator pairs with shared AVS: 4,786
  • Max shared AVS between operators: 12
  • Average shared AVS: 2.8

🀝 Top 5 Operator Pairs by Shared AVS

  1. 0x1f8c8b... ↔ 0x2e68d0...: 12 shared AVS
  2. 0xa83e07... ↔ 0xe483c7...: 12 shared AVS
  3. 0x46b3f7... ↔ 0xe58013...: 12 shared AVS
  4. 0xa83e07... ↔ 0xea9f73...: 12 shared AVS
  5. 0xe58013... ↔ 0xea9f73...: 12 shared AVS

🎯 AVS Engagement Patterns

Operator Metrics

  • Median operators per AVS: 56
  • Most popular AVS: EigenDA (258 operators)

Staker Metrics

  • Median stakers per AVS: 89,312
  • Highest staker engagement: EigenDA (138,789 stakers)

πŸ’‘ Strategic AVS Insights

  • 🎯 Market concentration: Top 3 AVS control 37.9% of TVL
  • ⚑ Most capital efficient: Lagrange ZK Prover Network ($107.5M TVL per operator)
  • 🌐 Strongest network effects: EigenDA (258 operators participating)

🏁 AVS Competition Analysis

Competition Landscape

AVS Operators Competing AVS
EigenDA 98 11
eoracle 59 11
Witness Chain 50 11
Lagrange State Committees 48 11
Automata Multi-Prover AVS 45 11
Brevis coChain AVS 43 11
OpenLayer 38 11
Lagrange ZK Prover Network 34 11

πŸ’° Strategy Distribution Analysis

Strategy Overview

  • Total strategies: 4
  • Total value locked: $286,436,865.97
  • Total operators using strategies: 8

Strategy Breakdown by Value

Strategy Operators Total Tokens USD Value % of Total
stETH 2 99,487.40 $249.1M 87.0%
EIGEN 2 22,230,873.14 $30.9M 10.8%
rETH 2 2,044.68 $5.8M 2.0%
cbETH 2 217.99 $0.6M 0.2%

Market Share Analysis

  • Dominant strategy: stETH (87.0% market share)
  • Market concentration (HHI): 7,684 (High concentration)
  • Top 2 strategies: 97.8% of market
  • Top 3 strategies: 99.8% of market

Strategy Efficiency Analysis

Average Value per Operator by Strategy:

  • stETH: $124.6M per operator
  • EIGEN: $15.5M per operator
  • rETH: $2.9M per operator
  • cbETH: $0.3M per operator

Top Multi-Strategy Operators

  1. P2P.org [all AVS]: 4 strategies

    • Strategies: cbETH, rETH, stETH, EIGEN
    • Total value: $283.6M
  2. Eigenpie by P2P.org: 4 strategies

    • Strategies: stETH, EIGEN, rETH, cbETH
    • Total value: $2.9M

πŸ”¬ Advanced Research Findings

Operator Efficiency Patterns

TVL per Staker Statistics:

  • Median: $101,638
  • Mean: $15,088,040
  • Std Dev: $63,193,298

Top 5 Most Capital Efficient (TVL/Staker):

  1. Renzo Operated By P2P.org: $336,589,021/staker
  2. Renzo Operated By Luganodes: $336,533,495/staker
  3. Renzo Operated by Figment: $336,360,000/staker
  4. Renzo Operated by Pier Two: $229,528,923/staker
  5. InfStones Enterprise: $112,608,599/staker

AVS Network Effects

Network Metrics:

  • AVS pairs with shared operators: 66
  • Max shared operators: 59
  • Average shared operators: 28.1
  • Network density: 0.031 (Sparse network)

Strongest AVS Connections:

  • eoracle ↔ EigenDA: 59 operators
  • EigenDA ↔ Witness Chain: 50 operators
  • Lagrange State Committees ↔ EigenDA: 48 operators

Strategy Concentration Risk

Risk Indicators:

  • HHI Index: 7,684 (HIGH concentration)
  • Dominant strategy: stETH (87.0%)
  • All strategies show HIGH operator concentration risk (>87% max operator share)

Temporal Growth Patterns

Current System State:

  • Total operators: 100
  • Total AVS: 12
  • Total TVL: $58,415,311,509.14
  • EigenLayer penetration: 116.8% of ETH staking market

Growth Projections:

  • 3-month TVL: $88.8B
  • 6-month TVL: $135.1B
  • Annual TVL: $312.5B

Operator Specialization Patterns

Type Count % of Total Avg TVL Avg Stakers Avg AVS
Diversified 46 46.5% $127.0M 1,961 8.9
Specialist 34 34.3% $92.7M 882 1.2
Moderate 19 19.2% $37.1M 868 4.0

Success Factor Leaders:

  • Specialist: ether.fi-8 - DSRV (TVL: $471.4M, AVS: 1)
  • Moderate: ether.fi-3 - DSRV (TVL: $271.0M, AVS: 4)
  • Diversified: P2P.org [all AVS] (TVL: $928.8M, AVS: 11)

Analysis includes comprehensive metrics on AVS ecosystem dynamics, operator relationships, competitive positioning, and strategic patterns within the EigenLayer network.

About

Eigenlayer Python SDK

Topics

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Packages

No packages published