-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 119
chore: Bump numpy support #496
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #496 +/- ##
========================================
Coverage 83.90% 83.90%
========================================
Files 25 25
Lines 8184 8185 +1
Branches 1709 1709
========================================
+ Hits 6867 6868 +1
Misses 1317 1317
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
fce08b2 to
cb27fc0
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should we include any tests for both numpy 1.x and 2.x for runtime, or is it not worth the complexity?
It's generally nice to test with the lowest and highest supported version of a dependency, especially when binary compatibility and bc-breaking changes are involved. So it sounds useful to me - however I don't know much about |
Signed-off-by: Cristian Le <cristian.le@mpsd.mpg.de>
Signed-off-by: Cristian Le <cristian.le@mpsd.mpg.de>
89bb70a to
fd8d8f3
Compare
Signed-off-by: Cristian Le <cristian.le@mpsd.mpg.de>
Signed-off-by: Cristian Le <cristian.le@mpsd.mpg.de>
Use cmake() provides to make it more portable Signed-off-by: Cristian Le <cristian.le@mpsd.mpg.de>
Signed-off-by: Cristian Le <cristian.le@mpsd.mpg.de>
|
Ok, all 👍 from my side on this issue. Fedora packaging seems to go ok, although rawhide is not on numpy 2.0 yet, and the new test where we downgrade the build numpy to 1.x seems to work fine. @rgommers just one final confirmation, building with Other than that @lan496 I leave it to you to make a final review and merge |
Yes, that definitely will not work. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Note: This PR also bumps up the required python version to 3.9
Closes #407