Skip to content

Conversation

@isomarcte
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

Copy link
Member

@rossabaker rossabaker left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

While we're in this part of the hierarchy, does PartialOrder make sense?

@rossabaker
Copy link
Member

Reran the nuisance native failure.

@isomarcte
Copy link
Member Author

While we're in this part of the hierarchy, does PartialOrder make sense?

@rossabaker added

@isomarcte isomarcte requested a review from rossabaker June 6, 2024 20:50
@rossabaker
Copy link
Member

I think this works, but while we wait for CI: in Chain, PartialOrder is higher priority than Hash. Here, that relative order is flipped. I don't think it matters between this pair, but we're leaving the comfortable precedent of Chain.

@isomarcte
Copy link
Member Author

@rossabaker updated to match the Chain priority.

Copy link
Contributor

@satorg satorg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@rossabaker rossabaker merged commit 90db3cd into typelevel:main Jun 10, 2024
@isomarcte isomarcte deleted the non-empty-vector-order branch June 11, 2024 15:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants