-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 115
Correctly revise methods defined in external method tables #904
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Correctly revise methods defined in external method tables #904
Conversation
timholy
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks great. I don't think that #815 offers anything that this doesn't, so this PR could close that one unless you disagree.
…ernal-methodtables
e69dcb5 to
da59589
Compare
…ernal-methodtables
516a1a0 to
024f45c
Compare
…ernal-methodtables
|
I looked into supporting the To avoid leaving this PR rotting for too long I think it might be good to move forward with the release of CodeTracking 2.0 and LoweredCodeUtils 4.0 after JuliaDebug/LoweredCodeUtils.jl#125, so we can merge this PR. Then, if the @timholy what do you think? |
ab8a38e to
d302445
Compare
…ernal-methodtables
|
Once LoweredCodeUtils v3.4.3 is available in the registry (JuliaRegistries/General#135445), if all checks pass this is good to merge! |
Fixes #646.
Requires:
method_infoJuliaDebug/CodeTracking.jl#140methoddef!: usemt => sigformat when filling insignaturesJuliaDebug/LoweredCodeUtils.jl#125To do before merging: