Skip to content

Conversation

@gatienc
Copy link
Contributor

@gatienc gatienc commented Dec 9, 2025

As discussed in #2877, this PR updates the link to download the NLCD dataset.

The dataset now provides a zip file containing the TIF file, so I used a similar method as in the Chesapeake dataset and updated the test file accordingly.

The dataset version on their website has been incremented. I haven't analyzed the changes further, but I tested the dataset by plotting it.

2024 data has also been added.

@github-actions github-actions bot added datasets Geospatial or benchmark datasets testing Continuous integration testing labels Dec 9, 2025
@adamjstewart
Copy link
Member

Can we focus this PR on fixing downloads and open a separate PR to add 2024 data? The former can go into a 0.8.1 release soon but the latter should be saved for 0.9.0 since it changes a default.

@adamjstewart adamjstewart added this to the 0.8.1 milestone Dec 10, 2025
@gatienc
Copy link
Contributor Author

gatienc commented Dec 10, 2025

Oh nice catch, indeed, I haven't thought about that

@gatienc gatienc mentioned this pull request Dec 10, 2025
@adamjstewart
Copy link
Member

I think this can be made simpler. See CDL as an example.

@gatienc
Copy link
Contributor Author

gatienc commented Dec 14, 2025

Indeed the CDL implementation is simpler!

Regarding the test coverage, should we add a test case to ensure an error is raised when the checksum is invalid?

@adamjstewart
Copy link
Member

I would just copy the CDL tests.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

datasets Geospatial or benchmark datasets testing Continuous integration testing

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants