Skip to content

Update SPONSORSHIP.md #2588

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 3, 2025
Merged

Update SPONSORSHIP.md #2588

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 3, 2025

Conversation

@arkid15r
Copy link
Collaborator

@arkid15r arkid15r commented Jun 2, 2025

Proposed change

Clarify SPONSORSHIP.md application/selection process.

Type of change

  • New country/market holidays support (thank you!)
  • Supported country/market holidays update (calendar discrepancy fix, localization)
  • Existing code/documentation/test/process quality improvement (best practice, cleanup, refactoring, optimization)
  • Dependency update (version deprecation/pin/upgrade)
  • Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Breaking change (a code change causing existing functionality to break)
  • New feature (new holidays functionality in general)

Checklist

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 2, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Simplified eligibility requirement text for GitHub Sponsors.
    • Clarified the application and selection process, including assignment procedures and guidance on when to begin work.
    • Added instructions for contributors to contact maintainers with questions or uncertainties about assignment status.

Walkthrough

This update revises the SPONSORSHIP.md file by removing redundant emphasis formatting, clarifying eligibility requirements, and adding guidance about the application and selection process. It now explicitly instructs contributors to wait for official assignment before starting work and provides direction for contacting maintainers with questions.

Changes

Files Change Summary
SPONSORSHIP.md Removed redundant emphasis, clarified eligibility, detailed application and assignment process, added guidance.

Possibly related PRs

  • Add SPONSORSHIP.md #2546: Refined and clarified parts of the original SPONSORSHIP.md, which this PR further improves, especially around eligibility and process wording.

Suggested labels

doc

Suggested reviewers

  • PPsyrius
  • KJhellico
📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9d778b6 and d791caa.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • SPONSORSHIP.md (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
SPONSORSHIP.md (2)

48-48: Clearer eligibility bullet
Nice removal of redundant emphasis—this reads more cleanly and the link to GitHub’s supported regions is spot on.

67-68: Solid assignment instructions
This addition crisply lays out the assignment process and discourages premature work—great for setting expectations.

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 2, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (9d778b6) to head (d791caa).
Report is 1 commits behind head on dev.

Additional details and impacted files 
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               dev     #2588   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files          225       225           
  Lines        14362     14362           
  Branches      2017      2017           
=========================================
  Hits         14362     14362

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Jun 2, 2025

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

@arkid15r arkid15r enabled auto-merge June 2, 2025 21:32
PPsyrius
PPsyrius approved these changes Jun 3, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Collaborator

@PPsyrius PPsyrius left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@arkid15r arkid15r added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 3, 2025
Merged via the queue into vacanza:dev with commit 6261bfb Jun 3, 2025
33 checks passed
@arkid15r arkid15r deleted the sponsorship branch June 3, 2025 01:28
@arkid15r arkid15r mentioned this pull request Jun 16, 2025
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@PPsyrius PPsyrius PPsyrius approved these changes

@KJhellico KJhellico Awaiting requested review from KJhellico KJhellico is a code owner

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@arkid15r @PPsyrius