Improved documentation and clarity for utils::list_long_breaks#3224
Improved documentation and clarity for utils::list_long_breaks#3224darsana-dev wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Summary by CodeRabbit
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings. WalkthroughDocumentation refactor in holidays/utils.py consolidating module headers and simplifying function docstrings for Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
|
Unneeded docstrings' and header changes, no useful changes. |
This PR enhances the documentation for the
utils::list_long_breaksfunction by:Adding precise and accurate comments for better understanding.
Removing outdated or redundant comments.
Avoiding duplication and improving clarity on specific topics.
Ensuring accuracy of explanation regarding function behavior.
Updated docstrings and inline comments in
utils::list_long_breaks.Removed unnecessary or redundant comments.
Improved explanation of parameters, return values, and logic flow.
Existing code/documentation/test/process quality improvement (best practice, cleanup, refactoring, optimization)
I've read and followed the contributing guidelines.
I've run
make checklocally; all checks and tests passed.