Migrate from MkDocs to ProperDocs#3346
Conversation
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (5)
Summary by CodeRabbit
WalkthroughThe PR replaces MkDocs with ProperDocs for building documentation by updating build commands, configuration references, dependency entries, and contributing documentation across repository files. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## dev #3346 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00%
=========================================
Files 310 310
Lines 18578 18578
Branches 2379 2379
=========================================
Hits 18578 18578 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@CONTRIBUTING.md`:
- Around line 126-133: Replace the non-descriptive link text "here" in the
ProperDocs documentation paragraph with meaningful text (e.g., "ProperDocs
writing guide" or "ProperDocs user guide") so screen readers and users know what
the link points to; update the link text in the markdown paragraph that
currently reads the primer link and ensure the anchor text clearly describes the
destination.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
Run ID: f164ca51-04ec-4e84-8612-68335d1a986b
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
uv.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
.readthedocs.yamlCONTRIBUTING.mdMakefilemake.cmdproperdocs.ymlpyproject.toml
|
Do I need to make any changes to my PR (#3282) regarding this? (Except for the make serve commands, which I am already going to drop anyway). ? |
|
@pareshjoshij Let me recheck just to be sure, but assuming that this got merged first, all the changes needed is for |
|
@pareshjoshij I've confirmed that it loads up correctly once you change all |
😄 yupp, Thanks ! |
KJhellico
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM. 👍 That was quick!
|
arkid15r
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM
Thanks for addressing this!
Proposed change
The migration is largely drop-in due to existing plugin compatibility with ProperDocs, with the exception that the ReadTheDocs theme now needs to be installed separately since came with no built-in theme.

Resolves #3345 .
Type of change
holidaysfunctionality in general)Checklist
make checklocally; all checks and tests passed.