Repository navigation
[css-color] Inconsistency of inherited value for color #10536
Description
I've recently tried to firm up the css implementation in GTK to deal properly with currentcolor, and found some inconsistencies with the newer additions to the css-color spec.
In a situation like this:
<div>
<div>
<b>What color is this text?</b>
</div>
</div>
div {
color: color(srgb 0 0 1);
}
div > div {
color: color-mix(in srgb, currentcolor, color(srgb 1 0 0));
}
What is the used value of the color property for the b element?
Trying to find the used value for the color property on the b element
according to the specs:
Since there is no cascaded value, the specified value is found by inheritance,
so the specified value is the computed value of the color property
on the parent element (css-cascade-5).
For finding out what that is, we look at css-color-5 and find that
the computed value for color-mix with currentcolor is the same color-mix
expression. So the computed value of the color property for the inner
div is
color-mix(in srgb, currentcolor, color(srgb 1 0 0)).
And thus, this is the specified value of the color property for the b element.
The computed value for the b element gets determined the same way again:
a color-mix expression with currentcolor computed to itself. So the
computed value of the color property on the b element is again
color-mix(in srgb, currentcolor, color(srgb 1 0 0)).
To find the used value, we need to substitute currentcolor, since we
are dealing with the color property, the value to use for currentcolor
is the inherited value of the color property (css-color-4), i.e. again
color-mix(in srgb, currentcolor, color(srgb 1 0 0)).
Substituting that into the computed value gives me
color-mix(in srgb, color-mix(in srgb, currentcolor, color(srgb 1 0 0)))
which is bad, since we haven't gotten rid of currentcolor this way.
If we bend the interpretation of the color spec to mean that inside the color property, currentcolor
is replaced by the used value of the color property on the parent element, we end up with
color-mix(in srgb, color(srgb 0.5 0 0.5), color(srgb 1 0 0))
which resolves to
color(srgb 0.75 0 0.25)
This is what my GTK code currently produces.
But when I look at browsers, I get
color(srgb 0.5 0 0.5)
which seems to indicate that browsers instead ignore what css-cascade-5 says and always inherit
the used value for the color property.
I think the specs are inconsistent and need to be clarified in this regard.
Activity
svgeesus commentedon Jul 15, 2024
Right, CSS color 4 says:
You said:
Yes, that gives you the used value of the color property. Consider
and
the used value of the color property is
color-mix(in srgb, color-mix(in srgb, currentcolor, color(srgb 1 0 0)))and the actual value will becolor-mix(in srgb, color-mix(in srgb, color(srgb 0 0 1), color(srgb 1 0 0)))on the<b>andcolor-mix(in srgb, color-mix(in srgb, lime, color(srgb 1 0 0)))on the<em>.That isn't bending, but it does give you the actual value.
which is why they fail a bunch of WPT tests related to currentColor, at the moment.
velsinki commentedon Jul 15, 2024
Aren't https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/blob/master/css/css-color/color-mix-currentcolor-003.html and https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/blob/master/css/css-color/color-mix-currentcolor-nested-for-color-property.html essentially about the problem statement in this issue?
Browsers pass these tests, but they do not apply the
color-mixrecursively but instead just inherit the used value. The testhas reference
According to the strict interpretation, it could be
color-mix(in srgb, currentColor 50%, white)→color-mix(in srgb, color-mix(in srgb, green 50%, white) 50%, white)on the inner div as well, but that's not how the test passes.svgeesus commentedon Jul 16, 2024
Thanks for the report, it seems those tests need to be revised.
velsinki commentedon Jul 16, 2024
But isn't the solution to those tests more desirable than implicit recursion? It feels like the same reason why for example relative font size does not apply recursively, unless specified with an explicit (e.g. wildcard) match. To me it makes more sense to clarify that within the
colorproperty,currentcolorrefers to the used (resolved) parent color.How would you otherwise avoid this recursion if you don't want it? You might get weird issues like https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/issues/6833 that are hard to solve just using CSS.
svgeesus commentedon Mar 25, 2026
Noting that the mostly-red results in 2024 are now mostly-green, which implies that browsers have now updated to do what the spec says.
@velsinki Can this be closed, therefore, or are there still inconsistencies between specs and WPT?
velsinki commentedon Mar 25, 2026
Afaik, the specs haven't been changed, nor have the tests I linked above. In my opinion, the tests make sense, and so do the browsers passing them.
But for example https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/blob/master/css/css-color/color-mix-currentcolor-nested-for-color-property.html clearly inherits the used (resolved) color, which as Matthias (and you?) mentions, is not consistent with the specs, which says it should inherit the computed value (unresolved) and thus resulting in recursion.
svgeesus commentedon Mar 26, 2026
Right. What has changed is the conformance of browsers to the specs.
Also true, so leaving this open.