Skip to content

Consider recording the "duplicate-attribute" error state. #3257

Open

Description

@mikewest

CSP attempts to defend against some kinds of dangling-markup attacks by preventing the execution of scripts that include "<script" in an attribute name or value. Discarding attributes during parsing makes it possible to trivially work around this defense, as described in https://crbug.com/740615. As dropping repeated attributes is also the root cause of the dangling-markup risk in the first place, it might be reasonable to dig into it a little more deeply to see if something more fundamental can be done.

One idea we (briefly) discussed at TPAC is to prevent nonced script execution for <script> elements which had duplicate-attribute parse errors. An approach to this that I'm exploring in https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/566822 does more or less the following:

  1. Records duplicate-attribute parse errors on the tag during tokenization.
  2. Persists that error bit onto the Node generated during tree-building.
  3. Reads that error bit during "Is element nonceable?".

WDYT?

/cc @whatwg/security (@ckerschb, @dbates-wk, @patrickkettner in particular as folks working on CSP)

Activity

  1. annevk commented on Nov 27, 2017

    @annevk
    Member

    cc @whatwg/html-parser

  2. bzbarsky commented on Nov 28, 2017

    @bzbarsky
    Contributor
  3. andypaicu commented on Nov 9, 2018

    @andypaicu
    Contributor

    Unfortunately this is still a pretty big hole in nonce based CSP policies because it opens very simple avenues for injection points to become dangling-markup nonce-stealing attacks.

    Does the above approach detailed by Mike seem reasonable. What are peoples thoughts?

  4. gsnedders commented on Nov 9, 2018

    @gsnedders
    Member

    To me this seems like a good idea given the potential threats, though it definitely adds some complexity (given the need to propagate the error). That said, my opinion probably shouldn't for a huge amount here. 🙂

  5. hsivonen commented on Nov 12, 2018

    @hsivonen
    Member

    Propagating a "this script is questionable enough that it should not run" bit to the DOM is doable from the parser perspective. Gecko already does this for scripts that were truncated by early EOF.

    Let's not overdo it, though. Let's make it just one bit that says the there was at least one duplicate attribute without trying to retain knowledge of which attribute was duplicated and how all the way through the stack. Or even just one bit saying the script isn't eligible to run (in case we want to add other reasons later or combine it right away with the truncation-by-early-EOF case).

  6. andypaicu commented on Dec 5, 2018

    @andypaicu
    Contributor

    I've raised the 2 referenced PR's, please have a look and let me know what you think.

  7. evilpie commented on Jan 26, 2024

    @evilpie
    Member

    This is still a problem, that I discovered while implementing the nonceable check in Firefox.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions