Use zig-lsp-codegen#850
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Member
|
So I've been working on this exact same thing in |
SuperAuguste
approved these changes
Dec 27, 2022
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Thanks to @SuperAuguste we can use https://github.com/zigtools/zig-lsp-codegen to automatically create zig types for the LSP Specification, which more complete and accurate. From the users point of view not much should be changed.
I've also used this opportunity to rework zls's message handler
processJsonRpc.https://github.com/ziglibs/tres has been added as a submodule.