I was logged in at 09:13 and logged out from euwiki at 09:15. Only clicking at recent changes, nothing more.

Now logged out from euwiki (~16:45 CET) but still logged in at Meta:

After some weeks where I wasn't totally logged-out, and just clicking on the login button would auto-log me again, in the last two days I have been logged out totally many times, and even being logged at euwiki didn't central log me into Wikidata, where I was asked again the 2FA.

There's no perfect solution, nor one-size-fits-all solution here. That's right. We should have two very different approaches, in my opinion:

I think that we are building the things upside down. While this is interesting, the most experiences users know which templates to choose, because they are experienced. The problem in T55590 is the opposite: how do new contributors know what are the most obvious or used templates?

Just look at this cc-by cast: https://sketchfab.com/3d-models/homo-neanderthalensis-skull-cast-a1ffe02b7e2f42ff972953484f3212d3

Strangely enough, today I was logged out from Meta, but not from Basque Wikipedia. I needed to log again at Meta, with 2FA, but I wasn't logged out from euwiki, as usually happens.

I use basically Basque wikipedia and only on Firefox, so is not limited to Chrome and English.

This happened again today, so I don't know if the restart system is working or it will take a while.

I don't remember all the steps now, but I think @Jdlrobson helped with some css (??)

Yes, that is solved.

Till last week this was happening usually, and I only needed to log-in again clicking on the "log in" button, it made it automatically without needing to enter the password again. Since there's a "Donate" button next to the log-in button, I have to fully log-in again, and I use F2A, so it is even more annoying.

Thanks!

I see that this is still happening here: https://eu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Bost_euskarriak. What should we do to improve that? Should we find every affected page and solve it manually?

In general terms, there are not discussions in these namespaces. The main exception is [[:eu:Wikipedia:Txokoa]], but we use flow there.

Yes, it can be a slippery slope and end up being extra-baroque. Could we limit it to a regular icon and a indicator icon?

Ok, I have opened T369266. I don't know if it should be a subtask.

It may be interesting to have the ability to change the indicator icon, because some projects have other icons for the "Spoken Wikipedia" feature. I don't know if this deserves another ticket.

There's consensus for this: https://eu.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Topic:Y7hix4r17jw04uzt

I have created a template that makes half of the way: https://eu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Txantiloi:Videowiki_atala

I have changed the template so the new naming is reflected.

Yes, right. I have opened the discussion. Sorry for asking before time!

It feels quite weird to ask questions that are described in the feature request themselves. I don't know what the purpose of asking again and again the same thing is: just making volunteers lose their time? Shaming them for not describing things exactly as you would like? Making requests more painful?

Non-smooth is the current one.

Sorry, I don't understand your question. This is something that can be solved with CSS, and could be added to common.css, as mentioned in the feature request.

It can be done with CSS

Yes, they seem solved, but still I find that some heights are not as expected. Anyway, I have opened a subtask.

I'm sure that this is related, but I was asked to open a new ticket.

Tonight @Jdlrobson added a new !important rule to the height at Basque Wikipedia main page templatestyle, which solves "for now" the visual problem. However, having two conflicting !important rules one over the next one doesn't look like a good long-term solution.

Feel free to split this to a separate bug if necessary.

The same is happening at AvoinGLAM page:

The same is happening at AvoinGLAM page:

The Main Page is also affected, breaking things that were perfectly aligned, as it seems that heights are not respected anymore: https://eu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Azala

Well... everyone using a template.

All infobox templates at Basque Wikipedia are also affected. The width is now larger, line-height is larger and the overall feeling is less compact, which doesn't make sense on some articles, with extremely large infoboxes now.

I don't know if this is the same issue: T366136

We at the Basque Wikimedians User Group are currently working on a GLAM project which may have content from museums currently available at SketchFab uploaded into Commons. It is known that this is currently impossible.

The bot is now working at Basque Wikipedian. Anyhow, it would be great to have such a feature available for every Wikimedia project, regardless of bots.

I am checking the section on mobile, and it works fine, but it doesn't show anything when using the APP. Visiting the Main page at the Wikimedia APP is not very usual (from visits data), but if we want to make this approach popular, it should work also with the APP (or be hidden instead).

Ok, now it seems that the order of the most viewed at topviews and at the cards are the same.

Yes, but not this case. The order of the articles is not the same. You can see that the most viewed is not the most viewed in the Pageviews (after removing false positives in both).

I don't know if this is related to the reported error or this is a new one, but the most viewed articles list from here: https://pageviews.wmcloud.org/topviews/?project=eu.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&date=yesterday&excludes=Carles%20Puigdemont|Gonzalo%20Boye are not the same that are shown here: https://eu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Azala/Grid

Thanks for the link @Xover. My aim here was something more "modern-looking". You can take a look here: https://eu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Azala/Grid

Thanks for the changes. Now we need [as far as I know] to things:

• Define how to translate the error messages
• Show the previous day, instead of a fixed past day

Sorry for reopening this, @KSarabia-WMF, but claiming "after thorought consideration and review" should have a link or a proof of that consideration and/or review.

Done

The last changes (https://eu.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=MediaWiki%3AGadget-cards.js&diff=9799967&oldid=9784872) seem to be breaking the functionality. I don't know if I added the change at the correct place, as it worked before (while static on one day) and now is not working anymore.

Observed at euwiki

I don't know the details on how much this blocks the deploy of the "Explore" section in the parent task. We are planning to deliver the new Grid Main Page in a couple of weeks, when we reach the 33rd Wikipedia with most articles and the 17th in the List of articles every Wikipedia should have. I guess we can deploy it without the "Explore" section, but this was a highlight of the new design.

It can be translated, but it doesn't work.

Marking as resolved, as showing the image from Commons has been also solved with templates.

Made sections with random content for every series. It may change during the September-May season.

This is still an interesting issue, but I found a design workaround.