It wasn't a great ending of the series. I hoped for more, not sure for what, but it was the worst part of the series. It was still a good novel, just It wasn't a great ending of the series. I hoped for more, not sure for what, but it was the worst part of the series. It was still a good novel, just not as satisfying (especially the second half of the book)....more
I think this series is one of the best feminist novels. Yes, the women were here show harshly, but one can't tell it wasn't true. I don't like what thI think this series is one of the best feminist novels. Yes, the women were here show harshly, but one can't tell it wasn't true. I don't like what they did. I would like them to be sometimes more modern, sometimes more moral, etc. Yet, in this cruel reality, I watched the essence of a woman, who we are, how we differ from men, and how we do not differ....more
This part of the series was a picture of a young marriage and other young adult relationships, dreams, and decisions in Neapol in the 1960s. I can't sThis part of the series was a picture of a young marriage and other young adult relationships, dreams, and decisions in Neapol in the 1960s. I can't say I approve or like them, but I can say I believe in the reality of them. I got also the feeling that it had many autobiography elements, I almost felt the author's emotions because of it. But perhaps I am wrong, and it was so just because Elena Ferrante is such a good writer.
I had some reservations about all those political, social, and philosophical discussions, or rather just mentioning them. Yet perhaps it was supposed to show the gap between the classes.
There were moments when I was a bit annoyed with the "love-dramas", almost like from the TV series when everyone slept/was in love with everyone (I mean, not at the same time).
And I am not a fan of cliffhangers at the end of the book. The previous novel had it too, but very subtle. This one ended like a chapter, not as a book.
Yet, despite the mentioned reservations, it is hard to give it less than the previous one. One of the reasons is the way the author portrayed women. Like brilliantly put it Violet wells...a dazzling display of a writer removing all the paint and powder from a woman's face mask and showing us the naked truths beneath (...) She dispels all the fog, unravels all the knots of a woman’s deepest feeling and elucidates in simple language the fount, the hidden motive. She always knows the secret as to why her women are doing what they do. She once said in an interview that her ambition was to make the facts of ordinary life gripping.
Well, I tried to read it a few times. Each time, I got bored or confused by the preface/dedication. This time I finally went through it.
Had anyone aftWell, I tried to read it a few times. Each time, I got bored or confused by the preface/dedication. This time I finally went through it.
Had anyone after Machiavelli said something new about ruling and invading? I don't think so.
What Machiavelli wrote was sad and depressing but it was true. I can be angry, I can stamp my foot and repeat "No, I don't agree with such a world", but it would not make it less true.
Absolutely a must-read for everyone interested in the topic. The language is old-fashioned (and a bit fatiguing), so if you are not able to go through it, read some good summaries (or use ChatGPT, etc.)....more
In the beginning, it was gripping and fascinating. Yet, nearing the middle I got bored. It isn't that it wasn't interesting, I just think that for nowIn the beginning, it was gripping and fascinating. Yet, nearing the middle I got bored. It isn't that it wasn't interesting, I just think that for now, I have enough of the Italians ;-) Perhaps I will read the second half some other day....more
I appreciate Hemingway for his journalistic style. The parts that could have been journalist's texts were the most interesting.
Yet, as a novelist (theI appreciate Hemingway for his journalistic style. The parts that could have been journalist's texts were the most interesting.
Yet, as a novelist (the third time, it was my third fiction book by the author) he wasn't as great as one might suppose by how much his novels are praised.
Despite that, and despite that the romance was sadly weak, I am going to pick for his another novel someday. Because, somewhere, between the lines Hemingway was able to convey to tell me something, and to show me that world.
The seventeen-year-olds (teenagers) are full of passion. I don't have to tell/remind you of it. This novel was an honest diaAn intense, fervent story.
The seventeen-year-olds (teenagers) are full of passion. I don't have to tell/remind you of it. This novel was an honest diary of a young man, who was discovering his sexuality. And, as such was priceless. If you want to know more - read other reviews, I will quote a few adjectives from them: beautiful, intoxicating, sad, intimate, physical, indescribable.
But, also, many times, listening to an audiobook I had the feeling I am listening to some kind of erotica, or even porno. I drifted between dense erotic dreams and excited stolen touches/glances. I am not going to tell that it could have had less of such precise descriptions, because, for sure, it gave me more true insight into Elio's head.
This wasn't a book I would recommend to everyone. Yet, everyone open to a such candid story should give it a try.
[5 stars for boldness and frankness, 3.5 stars for the atmospheric Summer love story, as a whole 4-4.5]...more
"And I can tell you too, Don Pietrino, that if, as has often happened before, this class were to vanish, an equivalent one would be formed straight
"And I can tell you too, Don Pietrino, that if, as has often happened before, this class were to vanish, an equivalent one would be formed straight away with the same qualities and the same defects; it might not be based on blood any more, but possibly on . . . on, say, the length of time lived in a place, or on greater knowledge of some text considered sacred."
One of the novels that show us the end of the world, the end of the era. This time we are in Italy (or more precisely on Sicily) in the middle of the XIX century, in times of Italian unification. I am a big fan of such historical fiction.
the Sicilians never want to improve for the simple reason that they think themselves perfect; their vanity is stronger than their misery;
It was written with care and I experienced that world thanks to Giuseppe Tomasi di Lampedusa.
Flattery always slipped off the Prince like water off the leaves of water lilies: it is one of the advantages enjoyed by men who are at once proud and used to being so.
Like always with great stories about big times, many observations were timeless.
Such thoughts were disagreeable, as are all those that make us understand things too late
"But you know better than I, Prince, that even fixed stars are so only in appearance."
And a few times, the author made me breathless and sad.
And as they climbed down toward the road, it would have been difficult to tell which of the two was Don Quixote and which was Sancho Panza.
Yet, I wasn't as engrossed as I can and like to be. Don Fabrizio and Tancredi were great characters but my bond with them wasn't strong. I agree with Vit Babenco, The book is full of light irony and it is written in a charming manner. The author’s observations are precise and sharp. It just lacked something that attaches me to the novel....more
I got from this biography what I wanted: the history of the life of Audrey Hepburn (probably as much as is publicly known now) and a few interesting fI got from this biography what I wanted: the history of the life of Audrey Hepburn (probably as much as is publicly known now) and a few interesting facts about life in the time and places she lived, especially about the theatre (plays) and movies doing then. That is what I always expect from such books.
It was obvious to me that Donald Spoto wasn't as objective (neutral) as he could have been. I felt as if he was trying to make a saint of her. Fortunately, (at least I hope so) he didn't keep any facts hidden, so I was able to see her on my own way. Not a saint, but a good human being, carving for love/acceptance, with neurosis, making good and bad choices, etc. Personally, I don't think she was a great actress (as she herself said), although she wasn't a bad one either. For sure she was and is definitely a cultural icon.
I would like to know and understand her better, but I am not sure it is possible now. Her biography could have been a bit differently written, but still, Spoto's version was enough satisfying for me.
“I don’t think either of them could have outlived Austria.”
The history of the Austro-Hungarian Empire isn't probably as known as e.g. the British
“I don’t think either of them could have outlived Austria.”
The history of the Austro-Hungarian Empire isn't probably as known as e.g. the British Empire, although, Austria-Hungary was a multinational state, one of the most important and complex in the second part of the XIX and the beginning of XX century. This masterfully written novel painted a dying soul of that Empire. In this dying was ugliness, brutality, but there was also romantical sadness and longing.
But everything that had once existed left its traces, and people lived on memories just as they now live on the ability to forget quickly and emphatically
The parallel between the Trotta family (men) and Austria-Hungary was brilliant. And the relation between Carl Joseph and his father, and between Kaiser Franz Joseph and his 'children' (the subjects) showed how genial was Joseph Roth.
The Austro-Hungarian Empire had to dissolve, nonetheless always when I listen to "The Blue Danube", "Radetzky March" and other Strauss' pieces, part of me dreams of that world....more
An absorbing story. From the beginning, I was gripped and I used every minute I could to listen to an audiobook. The Polish narrator was wonderful.
TheAn absorbing story. From the beginning, I was gripped and I used every minute I could to listen to an audiobook. The Polish narrator was wonderful.
The family/friends saga. Rather poor Neapolitan neighborhood in the 50s. of the XX century.
I like and I agree with Violet wells about the author: She manages to write about the most prosaic detail with a kind of hallucinatory urgency and as such her voice hits exactly the right notes in expressing the joys and torments of adolescence when every day seems to hold moments of both pivotal humiliation and triumph, moments few adults are capable of perceiving..
I was sometimes confused about the characters, a bit too many to follow all of them. I am not sure for how long the novel will stay with me, but while I was reading I was full in its world.
Uff... I have finished it. It was a long long listening to.
A story and characters - wise, with an important (then) message (now, it tells us somethingUff... I have finished it. It was a long long listening to.
A story and characters - wise, with an important (then) message (now, it tells us something about that time and society - was it very different from today?).
But it was so long, with so many dialogues. I admit, they were smoothly written and listening to them often was pure pleasure. Nonetheless, sometimes I caught myself not listening, despite a headphone in my ears. At times, it was hard to keep attention. And it could have been shorter without losing its power and meaning.
One is sure, despite the fact, I haven't had a great time as I can (and like) while reading a book, but it was memorable. I will remember the main points (decisions) of Isabel's life. ...more
The man was much greater than the sum of his qualities.
An interesting book about a specific time and place. I found many fascinating facts. It rem
The man was much greater than the sum of his qualities.
An interesting book about a specific time and place. I found many fascinating facts. It reminded me often more of a collection of stories than a novel, nonetheless, the two main priests and their friendship did create a beautiful wholeness.
And between lines (sometimes "in the lines") it was about faith, human nature, and civilization.
I am not sure it is the best book to start with Willa Cather, I would rather recommend Great Plains Trilogy. Still, I recommend it to everyone interested in the history of colonization, the history of North America, and the history of the Catholic Church. The author showed only one of the sides of history, but one should know this side too.
Did Daphne du Maurier write a bad novel? I don't believe it. Yes, I loved some more, and some a bit less, bu
salute the courage of a man who dared
Did Daphne du Maurier write a bad novel? I don't believe it. Yes, I loved some more, and some a bit less, but for sure, there is an obviously brilliant pen in each one I read.
"The Flight of the Falcon" was:
--> a story of the love of two brothers
--> a story of resistance of the old world from the new one
The old are always frightened of the young, but you represent a threat to their whole way of life
--> a story of being oneself
“You know the one thing that nobody in our country can endure?” he asked lightly, holding his glass against the light. “Not only our country but throughout the world, and right through history? Loss of face. We create an image of ourselves, and someone destroys the image. We are made to look ridiculous. You talked just now about humiliation, which is the same thing. The man, or the nation, who loses face either never recovers and so disintegrates, or learns humility, which is a very different thing from humiliation"
--> a story of changes in Italy after the IIWW
I’m here to bring trouble and discord, to set one man against the other, to bring all the violence and hypocrisy and envy and lust out into the open, onto the surface, like the scum on Domenico’s pool. Only then, when it bubbles and seethes and stinks, can we clear it away.
--> a story of the need for love
--> a story of loneliness.
If you read the novel just as a mystery riddle, you will like it, but you will lose the most precious parts, metaphors, and thoughts. Read deeper, and you will find (perhaps a bit muddy) a source of wisdom and not answered questions. I love du Maurier.
once is no good
PS Perhaps not one of my favourites by the author, but still 4-4.5 stars (compared to others by her I have read) and 5 stars (compared to the genre)....more
The happiness of your life depends upon the quality of your thoughts.
I agree with most of those of Marcus Aurelius' thoughts, opinions that I have reaThe happiness of your life depends upon the quality of your thoughts.
I agree with most of those of Marcus Aurelius' thoughts, opinions that I have read. His philosophy had much of Stoicism which is one of the most important philosophies to me.
Everything we hear is an opinion, not a fact. Everything we see is a perspective, not the truth.
Nonetheless, listening to it wasn't the best idea. My thoughts were wandering constantly, I couldn't keep my attention. Perhaps someday I will try it again, this time reading it by myself. For now, I will read a few more quotes....more
A unique new voice in YA historical fiction. A great debut.
I loved what topics Mackenzi Lee chose. I loved a love story. I loved (not the best verb hereA unique new voice in YA historical fiction. A great debut.
I loved what topics Mackenzi Lee chose. I loved a love story. I loved (not the best verb here, but I will stick to it) the complexity of characters and their burdens. I loved how she used historical facts. I loved that she put 'Author's note' and I could verify my suspicions considering historical accuracy. I loved the directness, boldness of the style. And I loved, that although it was not funny per se, there was a kind of lightness (adorable silliness?) that made the whole story more enjoyable and memorable.
I am definitely going to look for her other books.
One note: the novel was a bit adjusted to a modern young adult, so e.g. characters spoke more like today's people than in the XVIII century. But, in this case, it was a necessary solution and I don't complain.
I have enjoyed it like 4.5 stars book, I round up for a debut....more
A nicely funny romance. It is ideal for the pre-Christmas time ;-)
The narration went through emails and diary entries, so it could be annoying for somA nicely funny romance. It is ideal for the pre-Christmas time ;-)
The narration went through emails and diary entries, so it could be annoying for some readers, I guess. But I didn't mind. Moreover, I liked it, like I liked it in The Boy Next Door (the first book of "Boy" series).
It was definitely fast and charming reading.
Yes, the book was full of cliches, mostly about Americans, Italians, Catholics. I can understand that (as I see in some reviews) some readers were resentful. But let's face it it was really funny and these cliches (which Meg Cabot chose) weren't without grounds. I live in a Catholic country and I agree with these cliches. Also, I was (shortly, but still) in Italy and I have similar experiences (I couldn't accustom that they shut down all shops, restaurant, really all institutions from twelve to three). Of course, not all Italians, Catholics, Americans are like those described in the novel, but it is chick-lit romance, not "To Kill a Mockingbird".
An additional advantage of the story is that Meg Cabot was inspired by her own elopement to Italy. I was surprised how much of the story was not fictional. Moreover, these mentioned cliches took place for real.
So, it wasn't witty and deep Kristan Higgins' romance, but also it wasn't some totally silly young adult romance. It was simply entertaining. It made me smile and laugh....more
I wondered how it could be that two people who had loved could yet have such a misconception of each other and, with a common grief, grow far apart
I wondered how it could be that two people who had loved could yet have such a misconception of each other and, with a common grief, grow far apart. There must be something in the nature of love between a man and a woman that drove them to torment and suspicion.
I see five cores of Daphne Du Maurier's novels, five essentials that created her stories.
1. Her narration is near fairy-tales. No matter if it was Frenchman's Creek or The King's General or 'My Cousin Rachel'. I can't explain it. It's just that she sucked me in her own way into the world of the book, every time.
2. Her descriptions (e.g. of nature, people, emotions) are remarkable. They talk to a reader, they show us something. But they are not so overwhelming like e.g. Virginia Woolf's or D.H. Lawrence's).
There it was before me. Not the blue estuary of home, rippling, and salty fresh, whipped with sea spray, but a slow-moving turgid stream, brown like the riverbed beneath it, oozing and sucking its way under the arches of the bridge, and ever and again its flat smooth surface breaking into bubbles.
She was young, not more than nineteen or so, but the expression on her face was ageless, haunting, as though she possessed in her lithe body an old soul that could not die; centuries in time looked out from those two eyes, she had contemplated life so long it had become indifferent to her.
3. Her stories (the plot line) are simple (always with some kind of mystery). You could summarize characters and the plot in a few sentences. Her talent, genius was in the way she made of them the engaging novels.
4. Du Maurier was a good historical fiction author. I think she did deep research before writing her novels. So, her books are an interesting and informative glimpse at the bygone times and societies.
But I wondered, with a sudden flash of bitterness, what their manner would have been to me if, after all, I had not inherited the property. Would the deference be there? The respect? The loyalty? Or would I have been young Master Philip, a poor relative, with a room of my own stuck away somewhere at the back of the house? I knocked out my pipe, the taste was dry and dusty. How many people were there, I wondered, who liked me and served me for myself alone?
5. There is always second, third bottom/level. I am not sure if I have detected/found all of them. I saw women's lot through Rachel's lot. I saw how misogyny can poison - also without knowing that one has it in his blood. I saw how childhood, upbringing not only creates us but also dooms us. I saw the creation of first love (I think that the word "creation" is correct here).
PS1 I am curious if Du Maurier was capable to write/invent some kind of HEA.
PS2 I think I am in the minority but I wasn't constantly wondering if Rachel did it or not. I mean it wasn't (to me) the most important thing. The story showed me that she could be capable to do it (considering her past experience) and the story asked me also do I think other people were capable of doing it (of killing someone). I think that is the biggest question....more