"Predicting the world of 2100 is a daunting task, since we are in an era of profound scientific upheaval, in which the pace of discovery is always acc"Predicting the world of 2100 is a daunting task, since we are in an era of profound scientific upheaval, in which the pace of discovery is always accelerating. More scientific knowledge has been accumulated just in the last few decades than in all human history. And by 2100, this scientific knowledge will again have doubled many times over..."
Physics of the Future was another great book by the author. I have read 3 or 4 of his other books, and they never disappoint.
Author Michio Kaku (Japanese: ミチオ カク or 加来 道雄) is an American theoretical physicist, futurist, and popularizer of science (science communicator). He is a professor of theoretical physics in the City College of New York and CUNY Graduate Center. Kaku is the author of several books about physics and related topics and has made frequent appearances on radio, television, and film.
Michio Kaku is one of my favorite authors and science communicators. In contrast to many of his peers, Kaku writes in a lively, interesting, and engaging fashion that has no trouble holding the reader's attention. This book - like others of his that I've read - has a great flow. Admittedly, I place a high premium on how engaging the writing in any book is, and my reviews are always heavily weighted to reflect that criteria.
Since I was a little boy I have always been fascinated by the future of science. I read most of the popular sci-fi books as a kid and loved dreaming about the future. This may be one of the reasons why I enjoy Kaku's books so much. He's shared that same wonder and curiosity from an early age.
He continues the quote from the start of the review:
"...But perhaps the best way to grasp the enormity of predicting 100 years into the future is to recall the world of 1900 and remember the lives our grandparents lived. Journalist Mark Sullivan asks us to imagine someone reading a newspaper in the year 1900: In his newspapers of January 1, 1900, the American found no such word as radio, for that was yet twenty years in from coming; nor “movie,” for that too was still mainly of the future; nor chauffeur, for the automobile was only just emerging and had been called “horseless carriage ….” There was no such word as aviator …. Farmers had not heard of tractors, nor bankers of the Federal Reserve System. Merchants had not heard of chain-stores nor “selfservice”; nor seamen of oil-burning engines …. Ox-teams could still be seen on country roads …. Horses or mules for trucks were practically universal …. The blacksmith beneath the spreading chestnut-tree was a reality."
He also drops this quote; speaking to the scope of the book, and its limitations:
"As a consequence, we are better able to see the direction that science and technology will take in the coming century. There will always be totally unexpected, novel surprises that leave us speechless, but the foundation of modern physics, chemistry, and biology has largely been laid, and we do not expect any major revision of this basic knowledge, at least in the foreseeable future. As a result, the predictions we make in this book are the product not of wild speculation but are reasoned estimates of when the prototype technologies of today will finally reach maturity. In conclusion, there are several reasons to believe that we can view the outlines of the world of 2100: 1. This book is based on interviews with more than 300 top scientists, those in the forefront of discovery. 2. Every scientific development mentioned in this book is consistent with the known laws of physics. 3. The four forces and the fundamental laws of nature are largely known; we do not expect any major new changes in these laws. 4. Prototypes of all technologies mentioned in this book already exist. 5. This book is written by an “insider” who has a firsthand look at the technologies that are on the cutting edge of research."
Many innovations and predictions for the future are covered here; from self-driving cars, to nanotechnology, to space travel, and much, much more. The scope of the book is quite broad. It is also a very long book. The audio version I have clocks in at almost 16 hours.
***********************
As mentioned at the start of this review; Physics of the Future was a great read. If you are a fan of the author, then this one should be on your list. 5 stars....more
"How you perceive something is not simply a product of what your eyes or ears transmit to your brain. More than the physical reality of photons or sou"How you perceive something is not simply a product of what your eyes or ears transmit to your brain. More than the physical reality of photons or sound waves, perception is a product of the brain. Perception lies at the heart of iconoclasm. Iconoclasts see things differently than other people. Literally. They see things differently because their brains do not fall into efficiency traps as much as the average person’s brain. Iconoclasts, either because they were born that way or because they learned how to do it, have found ways to work around the perceptual shortcuts that plague most people."
Iconoclast was an interesting read. As the book's subtitle intimates; this is a largely science-driven book.
Author Gregory S. Berns is an American neuroeconomist, neuroscientist, professor of psychiatry, psychologist and writer. He lives with his family in Atlanta, Georgia, US.
Berns opens the book with a decent intro. Game-changing FM radio inventor Howard Armstrong is talked about. The author also drops the quote at the start of this review. Berns has a decent writing style, and the writing in the book bounces between historical case studies and modern science. I generally like books formatted in this manner, and I felt that this formatting worked here, too.
Whether you call the people talked about by Berns in the opening quote iconoclasts, contrarians, heterodox thinkers, or people who "think outside the box," they all have the desire to overturn dogmas, and reshape the way things are. He says:
"Iconoclasts have existed throughout history. A name was given to this type of person when Leo III, emperor of Constantinople, destroyed the golden icon of Christ over his palace gates in AD 725. Leo’s act of defiance against the church was to consolidate his power, but the word iconoclast, which means literally “destroyer of icons,” stuck. In the same vein, the modern iconoclast, whether consciously or not, acknowledges the fact that creation is also an act of destruction. To create something new, you also have to tear down conventional ways of thinking. But whether someone is successful in this enterprise depends largely on the three key circuits in the brain."
Invention and innovation are never achieved by following the status quo. These changes are brought forward by people who think and see the world differently from most. Berns expands further:
"To see things differently than other people, the most effective solution is to bombard the brain with things it has never encountered before. Novelty releases the perceptual process from the shackles of past experience and forces the brain to make new judgments. As we shall see in the following chapters, there are many ways to accomplish this. Iconoclasts, at least successful ones, have a preternatural affinity for new experiences. Where most people shy away from things that are different, the iconoclast embraces novelty."
Given mankind's inborn pro-social wiring and confirmation bias, true iconoclasts are indeed a rare breed in most societies. Even more so in societies that are collectivist in nature, rather than individualistic. So, knowing that, how can one learn to think differently? Berns sums it up nicely with this quote:
"The relationship between perception, insight, and imagination goes well beyond basic psychology or historical debates. To recap the neuroscience view, imagination comes from using the same neural circuits used to perceive natural objects. In this way, imagination is like reverse perception. Perception, however, is constrained by the categories that an individual brings to the table. Although categories may not be absolute, they are learned from past experience, and because of this relationship, experience shapes both perception and imagination. In order to think creatively, and imagine possibilities that only iconoclasts do, one must break out of the cycle of experience-dependent categorization—or what Mark Twain called “education.” For most people, this does not come naturally. Often the harder one tries to think differently, the more rigid the categories become. There is a better way, a path that jolts the brain out of preconceived notions of what it is seeing: bombard the brain with new experiences. Only then will it be forced out of efficiency mode and reconfigure its neural networks."
In this quote, Berns talks about leveraging the power of familiarity for the iconoclast's visions to gain traction in some interesting writing:
"The goal is keep people’s amygdalae from firing. In addition to responding to fearful situations, the amygdala has a hair trigger for anything unfamiliar. Iconoclasts, by definition, are foreign to most people, and anything that seems new or different will tend to set off the amygdala in most people. This is not a good situation. When the amygdala fires, it activates the arousal system of the body. The end result is that people will avoid the unfamiliar. The key to taming other people’s amygdalae lies in familiarity. The successful iconoclast creates an aura of familiarity to keep the amygdalae of his target audience in check. When Ray Kroc created Ronald McDonald as a connector to children, he banked on the familiarity of clowns to kids. Without this familiarity, it would have been absurd to market hamburgers to children with no disposable income. Arnold Schwarzenegger accomplished the same feat. Having already created connections with millions of people through movie roles, he banked on his familiarity to become governor of California."
Some more of what is covered in these pages by Berns includes: • Neurotransmitters; dopamine. • Branch Rickey—The Iconoclast Who Hired Jackie Robinson • Kary Mullis and the invention of the polymerase chain reaction, or PCR. • Fear and stress; cognitive reframing. • Richard Feynman. • The aforementioned human pro-social wiring. Solomon Asche's famous conformity experiments. • The stock markets; the St. Petersburg paradox. Contrarian investor David Dreman. • Henry Ford; The Model A and Model T. • Vincent van Gogh vs. Pablo Picasso. • Social psychologist Stanley Milgram; his obedience, and "6 degrees of separation" experiments . • Ray Croc and MacDonald's. • Rocketry; new technologies, Burt Rutan. Associated risks. • Arthur Jones and the Nautilus Machine. • Steve Jobs: The Iconoclastic Icon • An interesting Appendix titled: Drugs That Change Perception
***********************
I did enjoy this book, although I felt the writing was a bit dry at times... I would still recommend it to anyone interested. 3.5 stars....more
"When we forget how close the wilderness is in the night, my grandpa said, some day it will come in and get us, for we will have forgotten how terribl"When we forget how close the wilderness is in the night, my grandpa said, some day it will come in and get us, for we will have forgotten how terrible and real it can be..."
Fahrenheit 451 is a timeless classic.
Author Ray Bradbury was an American author and screenwriter. One of the most celebrated 20th-century American writers, he worked in a variety of modes; including fantasy, science fiction, horror, mystery, and realistic fiction. Bradbury was one of my favorite sci-fi authors when I was younger. I can vaguely remember reading this one as a young teen, but I didn't fully grasp the historical context of the themes played out here at the time.
Bradbury unfolds a tale of dystopian fiction here; the book's title said to be the temperature at which book paper catches fire and burns. The book follows protagonist Guy Montag, a "fireman" tasked with burning books, which have been made illegal.
The 1976 book cover:
[image]
Fahrenheit 451 tackles issues that are as relevant now as when Bradbury first penned this book, in 1953. The censorship and destruction of books by burning them - inspired by historical authoritarian regimes is a larger theme played out here.
Accompanying the censorship of written material is the theme of an illiterate society that has become infatuated with mass media. The book describes the parlor of the average house having wall-to-wall giant televisions that pump anodyne entertainment to an apathetic viewer, being careful to avoid topics like philosophy, religion, or politics.
Two other major themes dealt with here are resistance to conformity, and control of individuals via technology and mass media. Bradbury explores how the government is able to use mass media to influence society and suppress individualism through book burning. The characters Beatty and Faber point out that the American population is to blame. Due to their constant desire for a simplistic, positive image, books must be suppressed. Beatty blames the minority groups, who would take offense to published works that displayed them in an unfavorable light. Faber went further to state that the American population simply stopped reading on their own. He notes that the book burnings themselves became a form of entertainment for the general public.
In a 1994 interview, Bradbury stated that Fahrenheit 451 was more relevant during this time than in any other, stating that, "it works even better because we have political correctness now. Political correctness is the real enemy these days. The black groups want to control our thinking and you can't say certain things. The homosexual groups don’t want you to criticize them. It's thought control and freedom of speech control..." Oh boy. If Bradbury didn't like the "wokerati" then, I can only imagine what he would think if he saw the hyper-PC climate of today... This quote from the book speaks to the above point:
“Colored people don’t like Little Black Sambo. Burn it. White people don’t feel good about Uncle Tom’s Cabin. Burn it. Someone’s written a book on tobacco and cancer of the lungs? The cigarette people are weeping? Burn the book. Serenity, Montag. Peace, Montag. Take your fight outside. Better yet, into the incinerator. Funerals are unhappy and pagan? Eliminate them, too. Five minutes after a person is dead he’s on his way to the Big Flue, the Incinerators serviced by helicopters all over the country. Ten minutes after death a man’s a speck of black dust. Let’s not quibble over individuals with memoriams. Forget them. Burn all, burn everything. Fire is bright and fire is clean...”
Ironically enough, Bradbury mentions in the coda that; starting in January 1967, Fahrenheit 451 was subject to censorship via expurgation by its publisher, Ballantine Books with the release of the "Bal-Hi Edition" aimed at high school students. Among the changes made by the publisher were the censorship of the words "hell", "damn", and "abortion"; the modification of seventy-five passages; and the changing of two episodes. This continued until 1979 when it came to Bradbury's attention. Bradbury demanded that Ballantine Books withdraw that version and replace it with the original, and in 1980 the original version once again became available. In this reinstated work, in the Author's Afterword, Bradbury tells the reader that it is not uncommon for a publisher to expurgate an author's work, but he asserts that he himself will not tolerate the practice of manuscript "mutilation".
I enjoyed Fahrenheit 451. It is an important historical cultural commentary, that should be read by anyone who has the opportunity to do so. 5 stars.
"She didn’t want to know how a thing was done, but why. That can be embarrassing. You ask Why to a lot of things and you wind up very unhappy indeed, if you keep at it..."...more
Physics of the Impossible examines the realm of science fiction against the known rules of physics. As a long-time fan of both the genre of science fiPhysics of the Impossible examines the realm of science fiction against the known rules of physics. As a long-time fan of both the genre of science fiction and Michio Kaku; this one did not disappoint.
Author Michio Kaku (Japanese: ミチオ カク or 加来 道雄) is an American theoretical physicist, futurist, and popularizer of science (science communicator). He is a professor of theoretical physics in the City College of New York and CUNY Graduate Center. Kaku is the author of several books about physics and related topics and has made frequent appearances on radio, television, and film.
Michio Kaku is one of my favorite authors and science communicators. He mentions in the intro to this book that the genre of science fiction sparked his curiosity and excited his imagination as a young kid. This excitement is still evident in his writing today. As a fan of science fiction myself in my younger years, I think this is a large part of why Kaku's writing resonates so well with me. Many popular future technologies and concepts from the realm of science fiction are covered here, and Kaku makes reference to many sci-fi movies, books, and TV shows. Physics of the Impossible is my third book from Kaku, after his 2014 title The Future of the Mind, and his 2018 book The Future of Humanity; both of which I really enjoyed.
Physics of the Impossible has a great intro, where Kaku talks about the history of the scientifically "impossible." He mentions that black holes were once considered to be science fiction, writing "Einstein himself wrote a paper in 1939 that "proved" that black holes could never form." He also mentions that scientists decided that it was "impossible" for the Earth to be billions of years old. As another example, he writes that some of his contemporaries mocked early rocket pioneer Robert Goddard's research, claiming there was no air in outer space to "push" against...
Kaku cautions against making blanket statements of impossibility when making predictions about the future, and mentions that the topics covered here, although currently not realized, will be broadly classified into 3 distinct categories:
Class I impossibilities: These are technologies that are impossible today but that do not violate the known laws of physics. So they might be possible in this century, or perhaps the next, in modified form.
Class II impossibilities: These are technologies that sit at the very edge of our understanding of the physical world. If they are possible at all, they might be realized on a scale of millennia to millions of years in the future.
Class III impossibilities: These are technologies that violate the known laws of physics. Surprisingly, there are very few such impossible technologies. If they do turn out to be possible, they would represent a fundamental shift in our understanding of physics.
The formatting of the book was very well done. Kaku lays out the topics covered into the above three categories, and splits the book into three corresponding parts. The result looks like this:
Part I: Class I Impossibilities 1: Force Fields 2: Invisibility 3: Phasers and Death Stars 4: Teleportation 5: Telepathy 6: Psychokinesis 7: Robots 8: Extraterrestrials and UFOs 9: Starships 10: Antimatter and Anti-universes Part II: Class II Impossibilities 11: Faster Than Light 12: Time Travel 13: Parallel Universes Part III: Class III Impossibilities 14: Perpetual Motion Machines 15: Precognition Epilogue: The Future of the Impossible
Although Michio Kaku is a PhD theoretical physicist, he writes with a super-easy and engaging style, ensuring that the ideas he conveys will be accessible even to the layperson with little to no foundational knowledge of physics. A rare find in a science book, this is a hallmark of super-effective communication. As Albert Einstein once said: “"If you can't explain it to a six year old, you don't understand it yourself." Kaku is a master of relating extremely complex and technical ideas to the reader in an easily-digestible manner.
********************
Physics of the Impossible was another decent offering from Michio Kaku. I enjoyed his writing here, and would recommend this one to fans of sci-fi, or anyone else interested. 5 stars....more
This was an exceptionally well-written book. The Future of the Mind is my second from author Michio Kaku, after his 2018 book The Future of Humanity. This was an exceptionally well-written book. The Future of the Mind is my second from author Michio Kaku, after his 2018 book The Future of Humanity. Author Michio Kaku:
[image]
The Future of the Mind is a great example of a book with effective communication; Kaku writes in a clear and concise manner. The book is also written in terms accessible to the layperson, and not too full of technical jargon. When Kaku needs to get a bit more in-depth, he provides the reader with a brief contextual explanation. Extra points to him here for this!
[image]
[image]
The book also has excellent formatting; it is divided into 3 parts. Each part into chapters with titles. In each chapter, there are headers to summarize the following topic, and then writing which expands on that topic. At the end of every chapter is a sentence or two that acts as a segue into the next chapter and topic. This clear formatting makes it very easy for the reader to absorb and compartmentalize the information relayed here. The Future of the Mind covers most things related to brains, consciousness, and neurology. Kaku also covers many possible future technologies, including space travel, colonization, and alien life. The writing is excellent here.
[image]
Kaku is clearly a sci-fi fan, as there is extensive talk of many of the sci-fi classics here; Star Trek, Dr. Strangelove, Groundhog Day, Total Recall, The Matrix, X Men, Avatar, Men In Black, Memento, Brainstorm, Planet Of The Apes, Inception, Brave New World, I, Robot, 2000, and many more... So this one is sure to resonate with sci-fi nerds big time. People unfamiliar with sci-fi in pop culture might find themselves a bit lost at times, though.
I keep detailed notations of the books I read, usually by copying choice quotes from the book, and pasting them into corresponding files for later reference. I realized that I was grabbing and notating large portions of this book. Most of the writing here makes for excellent quotables, and the book makes for great reference material. If I were to find fault with this book, it would be that I would have preferred the author to have done the narration of the audiobook. Kaku speaks in the foreword but then has someone else read the rest. Not a big thing at all, and more of a personal preference. So I would definitely recommend this one to anyone interested. The book is very well researched, written, formatted and delivered. Kaku is a very effective teacher and an excellent writer. An easy 5-star rating for this one, and a spot on my "favorites" shelf....more
This was an interesting book. I have read a few books by Carl Sagan, and also enjoyed the 2014 reboot of the show Cosmos which featured author AnnThis was an interesting book. I have read a few books by Carl Sagan, and also enjoyed the 2014 reboot of the show Cosmos which featured author Ann Druyan and Neil deGrasse Tyson.
Author Ann Druyan is the widow of Carl Sagan. She is an Emmy and Peabody Award-winning American writer, producer, and director specializing in the communication of science. She co-wrote the 1980 PBS documentary series Cosmos, hosted by Carl Sagan, whom she married in 1981. She is the creator, producer, and writer of the 2014 sequel, Cosmos: A Spacetime Odyssey and its sequel series, Cosmos: Possible Worlds, as well as the book of the same name. She is credited with directing episodes of both series as well, according to her Wikipedia page.
The scope of this book is quite broad, and many subjects and scientific disciplines are covered in these pages, including: *Mendelian and Lamarckian inheritance *Russian botanist Nikolay Vavilov *Neuroscience of the brain *The Cassini spacecraft *The dual nature of light; wave and particle, and the related double-slit experiment *Quantum entanglement ...and many others.
[image]
Cosmos: Possible Worlds is full of illustrations that help bring some context to the writing. There are also many historical photos here, which was a nice touch.
[image]
[image]
Although I did enjoy this one, I felt it did not quite meet the high water mark established by the original Cosmos that bears its namesake. I didn't find this one as captivating and interesting as the original, unfortunately...
There was also quite a long and somewhat ridiculous bit of writing about nuclear weapons that seemed to go beyond arguments for non-proliferation, and into the realm of their complete eradication. Much of her writing on this reads as though she is chastizing humanity for inventing Weapons of Mass Destruction. This indicates her naïveté to realpolitiks, as well as her ignorance of the important role atomic weapons have played in the establishment of both the "Long Peace", and the "New Peace". A strong case has been made for the unprecedented stability and prosperity of a World established under Pax Americana that is not discussed in these pages. Druyan cites Manhattan Project chief scientist Robert Oppenheimer's opposition to the usage of the bombs he helped bring to life. Many of the scientists of the Manhattan Project were opposed to the bombs being actually deployed in war. Thankfully these people do not dictate military policy. The world we know would look drastically different if that were the case.
She also insinuates that Oppenheimer was the victim of a witch-hunt of sorts, conveniently not mentioning that Oppenheimer had been close to members of the Communist Party, including his wife and brother. On June 7, 1949, Oppenheimer testified before the House Un-American Activities Committee, where he admitted that he had associations with the Communist Party in the 1930s. He also was a self-admitted "fellow traveller". We fought a Cold War for the better part of ~50 years; against an ideology that had aims of global domination, and has brought unprecedented levels of wholesale human misery everywhere it has been implemented. To gloss over Oppenheimer's ties to Communism is dishonest.
Druyan also somewhat misses the mark on her discussion of quantum entanglement. She claims the entangled particles "communicate" with each other, which is not true, from what I have read. See Bell's inequalities for more. She extrapolates this "communication" between entangled particles to make a tenuous case for the magical nature of the Universe, and a possible case for faster-than-light travel, which is still not thought to be possible...
Overall, this was still a decent book, worthy of the Cosmos brand. I would recommend it to fans of Cosmos, or anyone else interested. 3.5 stars....more
This was an exceptionally well-formatted and written book. I really enjoyed it. This is my first from author Michio Kaku, but won't be my last. Kaku wrThis was an exceptionally well-formatted and written book. I really enjoyed it. This is my first from author Michio Kaku, but won't be my last. Kaku writes with a very engaging style, that holds the reader's attention effortlessly. This is a welcome change to many, many other science books I have read that are plagued by long-winded, esoteric and dry writing. The book is written in an easy-to-follow manner that would be suitable for the layperson who may be not too familiar with science. Kaku is an extremely effective science communicator; he takes complicated ideas, and conveys them in a simple and easy to understand manner. We need many more like him, IMHO. As mentioned, the book's formatting is excellent, as well. It is broken down into 3 main parts: 1) LEAVING THE EARTH 2) VOYAGE TO THE STARS 3) LIFE IN THE UNIVERSE Which then break further down into different chapters. Kaku ends most chapters with a really natural segway to the upcoming one. The book has an excellent flow to it. If you were a fan of sci-fi as a kid, or are curious about what the future has in store for the human race, then this book is for you. The Future of Humanity covers (among many others): *The history of rockets; pioneers Goddard and von Braun. *Missions to the moon and Mars; the possibilities of living on either. *The asteroid belt, and possibilities of mining them. *The gas giants, Venus, Titan, and other moons. *Robotics, AI, and self-replicating robots. *Transhumanism *Spaceships; different theoretical technologies, and rocket types. *Black holes, wormholes, and spacetime. *The possibility of life on other worlds. *String theory and multiverses.
I thoroughly enjoyed this book, and would most definitely recommend it to anyone interested in astronomy, physics, and the future of humanity in general. It is a big-picture book, with many incredible ideas that are sure to capture your imagination. 5 stars, and a spot on my "Favorites" shelf....more
This was a really fascinating book. Kurzweil lays out a few really interesting theories here; including his "Law of Accelerating Returns", as well as This was a really fascinating book. Kurzweil lays out a few really interesting theories here; including his "Law of Accelerating Returns", as well as his theory of mind: "Pattern Recognition Theory of Mind (PRTM)", that I found to be particularly thought-provoking. Kurzweil is attempting to reverse-engineer the brain; human intelligence and consciousness. This book is part of that story.
Law Of Accelerating Returns:
"...Kurzweil, after Moravec,Moore's Law to describe exponential growth of diverse forms of technological progress. Whenever a technology approaches some kind of a barrier, according to Kurzweil, a new technology will be invented to allow us to cross that barrier. He cites numerous past examples of this to substantiate his assertions. He predicts that such paradigm shifts have and will continue to become increasingly common, leading to "technological change so rapid and profound it represents a rupture in the fabric of human history." He believes the Law of Accelerating Returns implies that a technological singularity will occur before the end of the 21st century, around 2045."
"Kurzweil describes a series of thought experiments which suggest to him that the brain contains a hierarchy of pattern recognizers. Based on this he introduces his Pattern Recognition Theory of Mind (PRTM). He says the neocortex contains 300 million very general pattern recognition circuits and argues that they are responsible for most aspects of human thought. He also suggests that the brain is a "recursive probabilistic fractal" whose line of code is represented within the 30-100 million bytes of compressed code in the genome. Kurzweil then explains that a computer version of this design could be used to create an artificial intelligence more capable than the human brain. It would employ techniques such as hidden Markov models and genetic algorithms, strategies Kurzweil used successfully in his years as a commercial developer of speech recognition software. Artificial brains will require massive computational power, so Kurzweil reviews his law of accelerating returns which explains how the compounding effects of exponential growth will deliver the necessary hardware in only a few decades."
Pattern-seeking and recognition is a fundamental piece of architecture of the human mind, and Kurzweil examines this in-depth in the book. The start and subsequent ~50-75 pages was super-interesting, as was the later ~50-75 pages. I found the middle of the book to be a bit arduous, dry and esoteric, though. Maybe it's a subjective thing, as I imagine detail-oriented people in the field of AI would appreciate his attentions here. He talks about how micro-robots and other mechanical biotech will gradually supplant our own biology near the end of the book, which I would largely agree with. I found this quote near the end of the book to be particularly noteworthy:
"After lossless compression, due to massive redundancy in the genome, the amount of design information in the human genome is about 50 million bytes, roughly half of which (around 25 million bytes) pertains to the brain. That's not simple, but it's a level of complexity we can deal with. It represents less complexity than many software systems in the modern world."
Overall I would definitely recommend this book to anyone interested in AI, or the neuroanatomy of the brain in general. Kurzweil is a brilliant mind, and this book reflects that....more
This is my first from author Kurt Vonnegut. Vonnegut dropped out of university in January 1943 and enlisted in the United States Army. As part of his This is my first from author Kurt Vonnegut. Vonnegut dropped out of university in January 1943 and enlisted in the United States Army. As part of his training, he studied mechanical engineering at Carnegie Institute of Technology (now Carnegie Mellon University) and the University of Tennessee. He was then deployed to Europe to fight in World War II and was captured by the Germans during the Battle of the Bulge. He was interned in Dresden and survived the Allied firebombing of the city by taking refuge in the meat locker of the "Schlachthof-fünf" (Slaughterhouse-Five) where he was imprisoned. Vonnegut was beaten and imprisoned in this building as a POW, and it is because of the meat locker in the building's basement that he (and protagonist Billy) survived the firebombing; the site is largely intact and protected.
Kurt Vonnegut Jr:
[image]
[NOTE: I have taken some of the text below from Atlas Obscura, as it provides a succinct summary of the historical context for future reference.]
In Slaughterhouse-Five, or The Children’s Crusade: A Duty-Dance with Death, the main character Billy Pilgrim is captured by the Germans and taken to Dresden. In Dresden, Billy is held in an unused slaughterhouse, “Slaughterhouse number 5.” From this location, Billy, as well as his captors, survive the bombing of Dresden, which killed some 25,000 people in the ensuing firestorm.
Dresden in 1945. More than 90 percent of the city's center was destroyed:
[image]
This fictional account almost perfectly mirrors Vonnegut’s real experience in the war. In WWII, Vonnegut was imprisoned in Dresden, was beaten, and made a prisoner in Schlachthof Fünf or Slaughterhouse-Five, a real slaughterhouse in Dresden. When Vonnegut emerged from the slaughterhouse, he saw what “looked like the surface of the moon,” the result of the massive Dresden bombing by the allied forces. In Vonnegut’s words: “There were too many corpses to bury. So instead the Germans sent in troops with flamethrowers. All these civilians’ remains were burned to ashes.” It would be these horrific experiences that inspired Vonnegut’s 1969 book, named after the place that likely saved his life.
Slaughterhouse-Five mentions the firebombing in this quote:
"...He was down in the meat locker on the night that Dresden was destroyed. There were sounds like giant footsteps above. Those were sticks of high-explosive bombs. The giants walked and walked. The meat locker was a very safe shelter. All that happened down there was an occasional shower of calcimine. The Americans and four of their guards and a few dressed carcasses were down there, and nobody else. The rest of the guards had, before the raid began, gone to the comforts of their own homes in Dresden. They were all being killed with their families. So it goes. The girls that Billy had seen naked were all being killed, too, in a much shallower shelter in another part of the stockyards. So it goes. A guard would go to the head of the stairs every so often to see what it was like outside, then he would come down and whisper to the other guards. There was a fire-storm out there. Dresden was one big flame. The one flame ate everything organic, everything that would burn. It wasn’t safe to come out of the shelter until noon the next day. When the Americans and their guards did come out, the sky was black with smoke. The sun was an angry little pinhead. Dresden was like the moon now, nothing but minerals. The stones were hot. Everybody else in the neighborhood was dead. So it goes..."
Curiously, most residents of Dresden couldn’t tell you who Kurt Vonnegut was, let alone where the actual Slaughterhouse-Five is. Today, the Slaughterhouse-Five complex has been converted into a convention and event center, but the original architecture is largely intact and is now protected. The basement itself has been renovated, but now includes a memorial wall to Kurt Vonnegut and his novel. Recently, it has become possible to visit it on a two-hour tour with a guide.
Detailed directions to Slaughterhouse-Five can be found here.
Slaughterhouse-Five also includes alien characters, called "Tralfamadorians", which are also featured in Vonnegut's other books. Protagonist Billy Pilgrim reports that the Tralfamadorians look like upright toilet plungers with a hand on top, into which is set a single green eye:
"...they were two feet high, and green, and shaped like plumber's friends. Their suction cups were on the ground, and their shafts, which were extremely flexible, usually pointed to the sky. At the top of each shaft was a little hand with a green eye in its palm. The creatures were friendly, and they could see in four dimensions. They pitied Earthlings for being able to see only three. They had many wonderful things to teach Earthlings about time..."
Tralfamadorians have the ability to experience reality in four dimensions; meaning, roughly, that they have total access to past, present, and future; they are able to perceive any point in time at will. Able to see along the timeline of the universe, they know the exact time and place of its accidental annihilation as the result of a Tralfamadorian experiment, but are powerless to prevent it. Because they believe that when a being dies, it continues to live in other times and places, their response to death is, "So it goes." They are placid in their fatalism, and patiently explain their philosophy to Pilgrim during the interval he spends caged in a Tralfamadorian zoo.
[image]
I wasn't sure what to expect from this one, as it has been described as "one of the most enduring antiwar novels of all time", and has been widely acclaimed as a monumental work. The reading of the audiobook version I have was excellent. Although I did enjoy the book, and appreciated its historical significance, I didn't find the writing here deserving of a 5-star rating... 3.5 stars....more