|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
my rating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0691243050
| 9780691243054
| 0691243050
| 4.08
| 24
| unknown
| Jun 10, 2025
|
it was amazing
|
"I was inspired to write this book to help individuals who are afflicted with some type of brain or mental dysfunction, or have a loved one who is. I
"I was inspired to write this book to help individuals who are afflicted with some type of brain or mental dysfunction, or have a loved one who is. I am among you, and I am empathetic..." Elusive Cures was an excellent in-depth look into the complicated machinations of the human brain. The brain has been described as the most complex system in the known universe. As Bob Moawad once said “the human mind is the fastest, coolest, most compact and efficient computer ever produced in large quantities by unskilled labor.” (I always got a chuckle out of that one) Author Nicole C. Rust is an American neuroscientist, psychologist, and a Professor of Psychology at the University of Pennsylvania. She studies visual perception, visual recognition memory, and mood (psychology). Nicole C. Rust : [image] Rust has a good writing style that shouldn't struggle to hold the finicky reader's attention. The book gets off to a good start, with a well-written introduction. The author drops the quote above near the start of the book, and it continues: "..I acknowledge that there are complexities around whether and when we should consider some conditions as “dysfunction” as opposed to a type of neurodiversity that society has wrongly become intolerant to—cases of autism, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, and depression are all examples. That said, for each of these conditions, a subset of diagnosed individuals suffer in ways that can benefit from treatment. For those individuals, when our existing treatments fall short, we need better ways to help them. With this empathetic spirit, I use the terms “dysfunction” and “disorder” to refer to the conditions of individuals who need better solutions than the ones we can offer them today." The writing in the book is a detailed and technical examination of complex neurobiology and neurochemistry. I found lots of thought-provoking writing that I have not heard elsewhere here. Well done! I will caution potential readers of this book that they should probably have a decent level of scientific literacy before starting this one, in order to follow the writing here. The author uses a lot of scientific jargon as well as concepts that will likely be unfamiliar to the layperson. In this short quote, she talks about her credentials and the aim of the book: "I am a neuroscientist, and I have been engaged in brain research for over two decades. For a long time, I’ve been convinced that I have the best of all possible jobs: I get paid to think up new questions about how the brain works and answer them. A large part of what inspires my research is my intense curiosity about how the brain gives rise to the mind, and to ourselves. To answer these questions, I focus on memory. I investigate questions like: When we have the experience of remembering that we’ve seen something before, what is happening in our brains? How do our brains manage to remember so much? And how do our brains curate what we remember and forget? Her main thesis here is that the brain is not a "linear domino chain," but rather a "complex, adaptive, dynamical system." As mentioned at the start of this review, she says that the brain is the most complicated system in the known universe. In dealing with such complex systems, crunching local and systemic numbers becomes prohibitive. Instead, chaos theory applies. However, chaotic systems are extremely difficult to forecast and even harder to control. She expands in this bit of writing: "Hands down, the most profound and important insight I’ve had while writing this book is that the end goal of treating brain dysfunction amounts to one of the most formidable of all possible challenges: controlling a complex system. Not in the creepy or cartoonish sense of “mind control,” but in the sense that treatments require shifting the brain from an unhealthy to a healthier state. This challenge is so formidable that there are questions about whether it can even be done in principle (much less in practice). The answer depends on exactly what type of complex system we’re dealing with. Some more of what's covered here includes: • Alzheimer's • Cognitive Behavioural Therapy • Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) • Phenylketonuria (PKU) • Cystic Fibrosis • Capgras Syndrome • Waddington’s epigenetic landscape (some very interesting writing here) • Emotions • Emergance; complexity • Opioid drugs • Brain stimulation • Seizures; auras; Dyostyevky • Cancer drugs; drug resistance • Parkinson’s disease • Strokes; recovery • Psychedelics • A "Grand Plan for Brain Research" I will add a small gripe here. In the book, she says that there is no therapy that can slow the rate of progression of Parkinson's disease. As someone with a close relative who suffers from PD, this runs contrary to what I have read elsewhere. She talks about pharmaceutical interventions, but doesn't mention the potential benefits that regular vigorous exercise can provide. A cursory Google search yields a bunch of studies that seem to show that regular vigorous exercise can potentially help slow, or even reverse some of the decline associated with the disease. So, for anyone reading this who may have (or know someone affected by) PD, GET AFTER IT! I'm rooting for you! ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Jun 26, 2025
|
Jun 30, 2025
|
Jun 23, 2025
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
0262048930
| 9780262048934
| 0262048930
| 3.85
| 13
| unknown
| Oct 01, 2024
|
liked it
|
"In college, I became fascinated by the study of human origins and human evolution. The fascination was strong enough to dissuade me from applying to
"In college, I became fascinated by the study of human origins and human evolution. The fascination was strong enough to dissuade me from applying to medical school and instead pursue a PhD in anthropology..." Father Nature was a decent read, but the writing was a bit dry at times. As the title implies, the book is a science-based look into the subject. Author James K. Rilling is Professor of Psychology and Professor of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences at Emory University, and Director of the Laboratory for Darwinian Neuroscience. James K. Rilling: [image] The book gets off to a bit of a slow start, and the pace never really livened up as it progressed. I found a lot of the writing a bit flat. The author writes in a matter-of-fact, no-frills style. The book reads more like an academic paper than a book with an engaging story to tell. This was my biggest gripe. Rilling drops the quote at the start of this review early on, and it continues: "...I had the good fortune of attending graduate school at a time when new noninvasive brain imaging methods had just become available, providing a golden opportunity to address big anthropological questions with the methods of modern neuroscience. After subsequent postdoctoral training in neuroimaging, I began investigating the neural basis of human behavioral specializations such as cooperation and language. Sometime later, it occurred to me that paternal caregiving was also a human specialization and a neglected and worthy topic of investigation. Spurred on by a generous grant from the John Templeton Foundation, I redirected my research focus to investigating the biology of fatherhood. In the midst of that Templeton grant, my wife gave birth to our first child, a delightfully plump boy named Toby. Raising him while researching and learning about fatherhood presented me with a remarkable opportunity for my home life to inform my research and vice versa. My daughter Mia was born five years later and provided a whole new set of lessons that helped to shape my knowledge of fatherhood beyond the mere academic. They are now twelve and six years old, and I feel I have learned enough about fatherhood over those twelve years, both at home and at work, to have some useful knowledge to pass on to others. This book is my effort to do so." The book presents a lot of evolutionary theory. The author examines mammalian and primate paternity, incorporating a few case studies and relevant scientific findings as he progresses. The roles of many common neurotransmitters and hormones on male psychology relating to paternity are also discussed at length. He drops this interesting quote about a few of history's greatest monsters: "Joseph Stalin, Adolf Hitler and Mao Tse-tung all shared at least one thing in common: they hated their fathers. All three men had abusive and strongly authoritarian fathers. Mao Tse-tung’s father beat him when he did not work hard enough. When Mao later took merciless revenge on his political enemies, he told the men who were torturing them that he would like to have seen his father treated similarly.1 Joseph Stalin bitterly resented his father, a violent alcoholic who beat him severely.2 Hitler’s father ruled the family “with tyrannical severity and injustice,” and he viewed him as the enemy.3 Remarkably, all three seemed to have loved their mothers, and at least Hitler and Mao saw themselves in alliance with their mother against their father.4 ******************** Father Nature was a decent read, and there was a lot of interesting ground covered in these pages. I am a bit of a stickler when it comes to the readability of my books, though, and unfortunately, this one missed the mark towards that end for me. The book was also pretty long, and I felt it could have done with a more rigorous editing. I would still recommend it 3.5 stars. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Jun 15, 2025
|
Jun 18, 2025
|
Jun 12, 2025
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
1324037105
| 9781324037101
| B0D8R65BG2
| 3.81
| 118
| unknown
| Apr 08, 2025
|
liked it
|
"With every choice we make, the value system’s job is to weigh disparate elements against each other in what my colleagues and I call the value calcul
"With every choice we make, the value system’s job is to weigh disparate elements against each other in what my colleagues and I call the value calculation..." What We Value was a mixed bag for me. The topic of how people make choices is a fascinating one. I love reading about psychology and social psychology, so naturally I put this one on my list when I came across it. I'll cover both the "good" as well as the "bad" below. Author Emily B. Falk is an American psychologist and neuroscientist, and professor of communication at the Annenberg School for Communication at the University of Pennsylvania, holding secondary appointments in psychology and marketing. Emily Falk : [image] The author gets the book started on a good foot with a well-written intro. She's got a decent style, for the most part, and this one shouldn't struggle to hold the finicky reader's attention. The book is mainly a science-driven look into the topic. There are lots of interesting data about the subject matter covered here. She mentions early on that the material in the book is backed up by fMRI studies. She drops the quote at the start of this review early on, and it continues: "...These elements indeed include things like moral values and the economic value of an option, but they also include the consequences of your past choices, your mood, the opinions of the people around you, and so much more. A reward can be money, but it can also be friendship. It can be seeing something good happen in the world for others, achieving a small goal, or having enough energy and strength to finally run a marathon. There are many things that our brains value, many ways our brains can find reward—but as we find ourselves making the same choices again and again, it doesn’t always feel that way. Getting takeout trumps saving for retirement; hitting deadlines trumps professional development; the Internet vortex trumps spending time with the people we love. In this way, the choices the brain hands down don’t always align with what we might explicitly think of as the thing we value most." Falk talks about people's value systems and how they influence choice and behaviours: "We found that if parts of a person’s value system, like a region known as the medial prefrontal cortex, ramped up their activity when they saw a message about sunscreen or smoking or exercise, they were more likely to change their behavior to conform to the message—regardless of whether Despite producing a good intro and first chapter that set an effective hook, I found the rest of the book began to struggle to keep its initial pace. She blends the narrative of the writing between anecdotes and case studies, combined with the relevant science. I found a lot of her stories overly wordy and rambling (sorry). Even more problematic, the author unveils her tankie sympathies ~midway through, and unleashes an increasing torrent of woke leftist nonsense and jargon as the book goes on. Her writing is liberally peppered with ideological newspeak, like "Latinx," "straight cis white men," "white privilege," "structural racism, " "marginalized groups," and other assorted mindless terminology that firmly asserts her tribal affiliation. She's got a completely ridiculous blurb about "structural racism" and "marginalized groups" in universities. What exactly this "structural" racism is, or who is "marginalizing" these groups is not discussed. The premise is ridiculous, on its face. Modern Western universities are some of the most ideologically homogenous institutions in the modern era. IIRC, something like ~90% of Professors and faculty at some of these places and positions self-identify as left-leaning, left-wing, or even outright Marxist. To assert prima facie that there is some shadowy conspiracy to "marginalize" a group of people that sit atop the victimology hierarchy in the most "progressive" places in our entire society is completely laughable. And while I'm here, how specifically do universities "marginalize" black students? What are the mechanisms of action of this oppression?? They are nebulous, unclear, and never properly defined. The specific culprits: never named. It is the eternal shadowy boogeyman of Schrodinger's "systemic" racism. So commonplace that it's ubiquitous, yet paradoxically so elusive that specific examples of it are hard to find. Defining, qualifying, and quantifying this "systemic racism" is an ever-moving target. It's never properly pinned down, or manages to uncover any of the people involved in this ever-present nefarious conspiracy. FWIW, there has been a lot of discrimination and "marginalization" going on over at the admissions of major Western universities and colleges for decades, but not the kind she thinks. The recent scandal of universities penalizing high-scoring groups, such as Asians and Whites, by favouring admitting "marginalized" groups like blacks into spots they were not qualified for shows just how corrupted these places have become. A 2023 Supreme Court ruling ended the decades long race-based admissions, so hopefully some sanity and meritocracy can be brought back to these institutions. All this is especially ironic, considering that she's got a chapter in the latter part of the book detailing how what media and information you consume affects your worldview. How the environment you're in, the people around you, and the broader culture affect your perspective, opinions, and biases. Apparently she lacks the requisite level of introspection to recognize her own NPC-tier, culture-fed woke ideation. She's got a garden-variety dialogue tree of "THE MESSAGE™" on endless loop here, without even realizing how she got these "opinions." How funny. The irony is always lost on these types, IMHO... She likely wouldn't even get the joke if you explained it to her. ******************** The book was still a decent read for the most part, minus my criticisms above. There's a lot of great information discussed, and the book is decently readable. It's too bad that the author had to cram in her shit-tier political opinions where they had no business being... 2.5 stars. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Jun 05, 2025
|
Jun 11, 2025
|
Jun 05, 2025
|
Kindle Edition
| |||||||||||||||
019774995X
| 9780197749951
| 019774995X
| 4.30
| 27
| unknown
| Jan 07, 2025
|
it was amazing
|
"We have a confession to make. We are two social psychologists who have spent decades exploring the complexities of social life. We’ve shared our knowl "We have a confession to make. We are two social psychologists who have spent decades exploring the complexities of social life. We’ve shared our knowledge with thousands of students, as well as with audiences of teachers, health care providers, retirees, and conference attendees. From what we’ve learned and from what we’ve lived, we know that one of the biggest contributors to a happy and healthy life is the quality of our social connections. It is this core belief that got us here, writing this book, to share what we have learned with you." Our New Social Life was an interesting look into the topic. I was looking for something a bit different from the books I typically read, so I bumped this one up in my list when I came across it. Co-author Natalie Kerr, Ph.D., is a social psychologist and award-winning professor at James Madison University, where she studies social connection and loneliness. Her work has been published in journals such as the Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, Personality and Individual Differences, and Social Influence. Natalie Kerr: [image] The authors write with a lively style, and I found the book to be decently readable. It won't struggle to hold the picky reader's attention. I also found it to have good formatting. It is broken into well-delineated chapters, and each chapter into blurbs with relevant headers at the top. I generally do well with books formatted like this. In this short quote, the authors lay out the book's aim: "In this book, we will shed light on seven key barriers to social connection —each corresponding to a different chapter—and offer research-based strategies for removing them. Some of these strategies might seem obvious (although we suspect that they are often easier to understand than they are to execute), but others might surprise you. (For example, did you know that meditating can help you feel more socially connected, even when you’re doing it alone?) The strategies in the book can help you live a more connected life, and they might also help you live a longer life. As we’ll see, research shows that your feelings of connection are a significant predictor of how long you’ll live!" Although the title of the book is somewhat ambiguous, I was pleased to find that most of the writing in the book proper was science-based. The authors cover many different studies from psychology and social psychology. As well, they drop a few case studies to illustrate their points. I enjoyed this, and also felt it worked here. The book is broken into 7 chapters. They are: 1. Social by Nature: Why Connection Is an Essential Need 2. Recipe for Disconnection: How the Norms of Modern Life Are Pulling Us Apart 3. A Distorted Reality: Seeing the Social World through Our Personal Filter 4. Faulty Mind-Reading: Why We Underestimate Others’ Desire to Connect 5. Liking, Demystified: Why Making Connections Can Be Surprisingly Simple 6. Beyond Casual Connection: The Rules and Rewards of Building Intimacy 7. Connection on Demand: How to Feel Connected Even When We’re Alone Although the material presented here was very well done, for the most part, the authors peppered their writing with assorted nonsense leftist terms like "marginalized groups." They say the book is for everyone: "Females, males, and nonbinary people." I'm sorry if I'm the first person to tell these women that human beings are a sexually dimorphic, sexually reproducing species, with just 2 default phenotypes. ******************** Aside from my minor gripe about the addition of superfluous mindless leftist newspeak, the book was still a decent read. I would recommend it 4.5 stars. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
May 28, 2025
|
May 30, 2025
|
May 27, 2025
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
1668012545
| 9781668012543
| 1668012545
| 3.73
| 583
| unknown
| Mar 11, 2025
|
it was amazing
|
"Only those who have personality and emotions know what it means to want to escape from these things." —T.S. Eliot Me, But Better was an interesting loo "Only those who have personality and emotions know what it means to want to escape from these things." —T.S. Eliot Me, But Better was an interesting look into the topic. I came across the author from her recent appearance on Michael Shermer's Skeptic podcast, which I enjoyed. Author Olga Khazan is an American journalist and writer known for her work on health, science, and social science topics. She is a staff writer at The Atlantic. Olga Khazan : [image] The author opens the book with a good intro. She's got a decent writing style that shouldn't struggle to hold the reader's attention. The book details a lot of her deep personal vulnerability. She says she drinks a lot, has a bad temper, and is somewhat antisocial. (I found this pretty relatable LMAO.) I appreciated that the stories about herself and her relationships here seemed real. The writing was super authentic. The audiobook version I have was also read by author, which was a nice touch. The narrative in the book is split between the author's personal story, coupled with the relevant science along the way. She took a personality test, and tried to "fix" elements of her personality that she didn't like; chiefly her trait neuroticism and extroversion in the Big 5 Personality traits. She writes of these aspects of her personality in this short bit: "...That wasn’t an isolated incident. I often had moments like these, in which I snatched dissatisfaction from the jaws of happiness. At the heart of the book is the thesis that personality is not fixed, but rather malleable. This line of thinking runs contrary to the orthodoxy of personality theory that has long been entrenched in modern psychology. She covers each of the 5 traits in the aforementioned Big 5, as well as different modalities and prescriptions for changing long-established behaviors. She mentions the work of Carol S. Dweck and her "fixed" vs "growth" mindsets. In a theme that aligns with ones found in ancient philosophy, she says that traits can be modified. You are not your triats, you are your habits. And your habits are determined by your actions. Your actions, by your intentions. Your intentions, by your thoughts. It is the causal chain talked about in the famous quote: "Watch your thoughts, they become your actions. Watch your actions, they become your habits. Watch your habits, they become your character. Watch your character, it becomes your destiny..." ******************** I enjoyed Me, But Better. It was an interesting short read. It was a well-researched, written and delivered book. The author did a great job with this one. I would definitely recommend it to anyone interested. 5 stars. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Jul 22, 2025
|
Jul 24, 2025
|
May 22, 2025
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
B075SP4XPQ
| 3.80
| 3,272
| 2018
| Mar 29, 2018
|
it was ok
|
"There’s a fundamental idea in psychology and medicine that the path your life takes depends on just three causes: how you manage your challenges, pro
"There’s a fundamental idea in psychology and medicine that the path your life takes depends on just three causes: how you manage your challenges, protect your vulnerabilities, and increase your resources..." I went into Resilient with high hopes, but ultimately became frustrated with the writing. More below. Author Rick Hanson, Ph.D. is a psychologist, Senior Fellow at UC Berkeley’s Greater Good Science Center, and New York Times best-selling author. Rick Hanson : [image] Hanson opens the writing with a good intro, which unfortunately proved to be the high water mark of the book. The meat and potatoes of the book come from the ancient philosophies of Buddhism and Stoicism. Some modern neuroscience is also covered. The author drops the quote above near the start of the book, and it continues: "...These causes are located in three places: your world, your body, and your mind. Unfortunately, many of these self-help books can be hit or miss, in my experience, and this one was a "miss." The book features many guided meditations. These guided meditations went on for quite a long time, and were simplistic and repetitive. Just when I thought he was going to move on, he dropped another one. There were way too many of these, and they all went on for too long. This was somewhat innocuous at first, and then progressively got extremely irritating as the book went on. Also, during these guided meditations, the author talks to the reader almost like they were a small child. As well, the bulk of the advice here could only accurately be considered common sense and garden variety. It became too much. They were all something along the lines of: "...Think about the other person. Know that they have pain. Think about this pain. Acknowledge their pain. Realize that they are compassionate beings. Blah blah blah..." This kind of writing just doesn't resonate with me. Sorry. ******************** I would not recommend this one. Remind me to take a pass from anything else this author produces. 1.5 stars. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
May 11, 2025
|
May 14, 2025
|
May 01, 2025
|
Kindle Edition
| |||||||||||||||||
0857199749
| 9780857199744
| 0857199749
| 4.01
| 343
| unknown
| Mar 28, 2023
|
it was amazing
|
"Behavioural science has its roots in social psychology, an academic subject which stretches back to the 1890s. Since then, psychologists have identif
"Behavioural science has its roots in social psychology, an academic subject which stretches back to the 1890s. Since then, psychologists have identified thousands of hidden drivers of human behaviour. This variety means that whatever brief you’re tackling, there’s likely to be a relevant bias that you can use." The Illusion of Choice was a very well-done look into some interesting human psychology. I enjoyed this one. Author Richard Shotton specialises in applying behavioural science to marketing. He has worked in the field for 22 years and in 2018 founded the consultancy Astroten. Astroten helps brands such as Google, Meta, BrewDog and Barclays use behavioural science to solve their marketing challenges. Richard Shotton : [image] Shotten gets the writing here off on a good foot, with a well written intro. He talks about colouring margarine yellow to associate it with butter, and the resulting sales increase it saw after implementing the change. He's got a great style that I found to be both informative and engaging. I am extremely picky on how readable my books are, and this one passed muster with flying colours. It won't struggle to hold even the finicky reader's attention. The formatting was also very well done. The book is broken into well delineated chapters, and each chapter; into separate chunks with relevant headers at the top. I like books formatted like this, and don't know why more authors don't employ this in their books. It makes the information so much easier to digest. Although the book's subtitle mentions psychology, at its heart it is a marketing book, that draws from scientific studies of psychology and social psychology to bolster its claims. The author drops the quote at the start of this review early on, and continues with this bit of noteworthy writing: "Relevance, robustness and range are three strong reasons for applying behavioural science in your business. However, knowing you should apply behavioural science and actually applying behavioural science are different things. I found lots of excellent writing all throughout this one. The author unfolds this content succinctly and effectively. The book contains countless interesting factoids and related quotes. Well done! The contents of the book are: Habit Formation 2: Make It Easy 3: Make it Difficult 4: The Generation Effect 5: The Keats Heuristic 6: Concreteness 6½: Precision Specific rather than round numbers Bonus Chapter: Base Value Neglect 7: Extremeness Aversion B2B as well as B2C 8: Denominator Neglect Applying the idea laterally 9: The Need to Experiment 10: Framing 11: Fairness A long pedigree From cucumbers to cash 12: Freedom of Choice You are free to ignore the next section of this chapter 13: the Red Sneakers Effect 14: The Halo Effect Experimental evidence Why does the halo effect occur? 15: The Wisdom of Wit 16: The Peak-End Rule Shotton ends the book with a great outro, and drops a short list of other recommended books, which I felt was a nice touch. I'm always looking to add books to my "to read" list. ******************** The Illusion of Choice was an excellent short read; all around. The author did a great job on this one. It is full of super-interesting info, and written in an engaging and effective style. The book is a great example of wrtiting done well. An easy 5 star rating from me, and a spot on my "favorites" shelf. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Apr 16, 2025
|
Apr 17, 2025
|
Apr 14, 2025
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
0226833682
| 9780226833682
| 0226833682
| 4.15
| 60
| Jul 26, 2024
| Jul 26, 2024
|
did not like it
|
"What do we do with the empirical or physical implications of impossible phenomena? And how do these same physical-mental phenomena challenge and chan
"What do we do with the empirical or physical implications of impossible phenomena? And how do these same physical-mental phenomena challenge and change our conceptions of the human, of consciousness, of embodiment, and, perhaps most of all, of the relationship of the human being to space-time and the physical cosmos itself? Actually, how do they change everything?" I was excited to start How to Think Impossibly. Unfortunately, I did not like the writing here, for a few reasons. I first heard about the book from the author's recent appearance on Michael Shermer's Skeptic podcast, which I enjoyed. Unfortunately, the interesting concepts talked about there did not carry over to the writing in the book. More below. Author Jeffrey John Kripal is an American college professor. He is the J. Newton Rayzor Chair in Philosophy and Religious Thought at Rice University in Houston, Texas. Jeffrey J. Kripal : [image] The book gets off to a decent start, with a decently engaging and interesting intro. He drops the quote at the beginning of this review, and it continues: "...I mean it. Consider precognitive phenomena. I have long thought of these as the most well-documented and philosophically important of all impossible events. As such, they carry immense potential for influencing everything intellectuals and scientists do. If taken as real (by which I simply mean, “they happen”), such experiences and events (and they are both) would transform the entire order of knowledge upon which our present culture depends, the sciences included. For a start, they could tell us something stunning about the practice of history (time goes both ways), the history of religions (divination is globally distributed because it is based on an actual, if unreliable, human ability), the philosophy of mind (consciousness and cognition are not stuck in the present skull cavity or in this temporal slice of a body), and even something as abstract as causality itself (agency can act from the future). If we want to begin to learn how to think impossibly, precognitive phenomena are going to be a key to any such new order of knowledge." The writing in the book loosely incorporates many different stories of precognition. The author expands further: "Impossible things certainly happen in numerous cultural zones and through specific ritual practices on a fairly routine basis. This is why a comparative practice is so necessary, so liberating and healing, but also so devastating to our local assumptions. Trained intellectuals who experience the impossible are commonly shocked and often see and say more or less the same thing: “It is not what we thought.”13 Unfortunately, the writing here progressively took a turn into the weeds, and became long-winded, dense, and tedious. The book slowly lost the forest for the trees. It's also way too long; IMHO. If you are going to write a book this long, it had better be interesting. Sadly, most of the writing was not. The author started citing obscure books and authors. He went into great detail about these authors, their books, and their personal philosophies. There was lots of rambling writing that lost focus and narrative continuity. There was also just too much esoteric philosophical jargon throughout. I found this style to be very off-putting. Also, quite a lot of time was spent here talking about interdimensional beings. Specifically: mantises and other insectoid creatures. This was beginning to strain credulity. The author also theorizes a correlation between the rise of alien abductions and autism, providing only a philosophical underpinning for this assertion. So, all that was getting a bit much for me - but it kept going. The author also talks about "remote viewing" and other pseudoscientific woo-woo. He asserts that these phenomena are all objectively real, and not simply the by-products of altered states of consciousness. ******************** Ultimately, I put this one down a little over halfway through, which is something I rarely do. The book was a jumbled mess. I was not prepared to spend any more time on a super long book I was not enjoying. 1 star. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Apr 11, 2025
|
Apr 15, 2025
|
Apr 10, 2025
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
1529300177
| 9781529300178
| B0B5CX8JKK
| 4.07
| 312
| unknown
| Jul 07, 2022
|
liked it
|
"Our minds are changing. They have been changing for nearly 7 million years. What these changes were, how they affect us today, and where they may lea
"Our minds are changing. They have been changing for nearly 7 million years. What these changes were, how they affect us today, and where they may lead us in the future is the subject of this book..." How the Mind Changed was an interesting look into the workings of our most complex organ. As Bob Moawad once said: “the human mind is the fastest, coolest, most compact and efficient computer ever produced in large quantities by unskilled labor.” I enjoyed most of the book; on balance, but I had a few thoughts and contentions. More below. This review will be a long one, so get comfortable. Or feel free to skip to the bottom for a tl;dr. Author Joseph Jebelli is a neuroscientist and a writer. He received a PhD in neuroscience from University College London for his work on the cell biology of neurodegenerative diseases, then worked as a postdoctoral research fellow at the University of Washington, Seattle. Joseph Jebelli: [image] Jebelli opens the book with a solid intro that set a good hook. He's got an effective style, which is a nice treat in a science book. This one won't struggle to hold your attention. The book also had excellent formatting and cohesion; overall. It is broken into well-delineated chapters, and each chapter into blurbs with relevant headers at the top. I generally do well with books set up like this. I have read a fair bit about neuroscience, and many of the things talked about here were new to me. Another nice treat! The book is full of super interesting writing. I found many excellent quoteables throughout. The author drops the quote at the start of this review early on, and it continues: "...When we think of minds changing we usually think of psychological changes that affect our moods and outlook. Or neurological changes following a head injury or during an illness. But the changes I am interested in run much deeper. They span the evolutionary history of our early human ancestors and shape every aspect of who we are – our emotions, our memories, our languages, our intelligence and, indeed, the very fabric of our cultures and societies. It might not feel like it, but we are all heirs to millions of years of brain evolution: countless trial-and-error experiments in our mind’s relationship with the natural world. As a result, we are cleverer and more interconnected than our forebears ever imagined." On the positive side; I enjoyed most of the writing in here. The author writes very well, and did a great job covering an incredibly wide swath of subject matter in an accessible manner. However, there were a few things that stuck out to me. Off the top - he talks about consciousness and how it is "an illusion." He also asserts there is no free will. These are among some of the most contested arguments in all of neuroscience, and some nuance and more careful, drawn-out examinations of these hotly debated discussions would have been nice. Additionally, he talks about intelligence at some length here. He downplays the significance of both IQ and "G factor" intelligence. He also says intelligence is malleable, and can change during one's lifetime. These assertions run contrary to what I've read elsewhere. I have previously read that IQ is the most robustly evidenced psychometric known; they have been testing it for over 100 years. In the US Army, applicants are given a form of IQ test. As well, SAT scores are somewhat of a proxy for IQ. So, it's been measured across cultural groups, over multiple decades, producing an enormous body of data. I don't have a dog in the fight either way, and it would have been nice if the author had spent a bit more time backing up such a contentious claim with more evidence. A cursory Google search turned up this article, which was a decent look further and seems to bolster the author's claims. He talks a bit about the "Flynn effect;" basically that people have steadily become more intelligent over the last ~hundred or so years. What he doesn't mention is this effect has apparently stopped, and is now actually reversing, in what has been dubbed the 'Reverse Flynn Effect.' See here for more. Weirdly enough, he's also got a short bit of writing here that seems to espouse the benefits of countless personal pronouns. He says: "Scholars in the new field of discursive psychology, a branch of science that investigates how the self is socially constructed, are particularly interested in how people’s pronouns affect their sense of self. According to these scholars, the self is a ‘continuous production’ built from words and culture. Until recently, the first-person pronouns ‘I’, ‘me’ and ‘mine’ predominated in Western society. Now, however, dozens of pronouns are used to express various identities: ‘ze’, ‘ey’, ‘hir’, ‘xe’, ‘hen’, ‘ve’, ‘ne’, ‘per’, ‘thon’ and more. Sticklers for grammar view this as an assault on the English language. Sticklers for tradition view it as a slippery slope to government-mandated speech codes. ~I'm sorry, but "new-age gobbledygook" seems to summarize the situation aptly. Personally, I might use harsher language, but I'll refrain here. Human beings are a sexually reproducing, sexually dimorphic species with two default phenotypes. We have been this way for the entire ~7 or so million years that we've been hominids... Cry-bullying people into using made-up words for yourself also has indeed been used to enforce "government-mandated speech codes." In Canada under Bill C-16, gender identity has recently become protected under hate speech legislation, punished as a criminal offense. This is the backdrop in which Toronto-based professor and clinical psychologist Jordan B. Peterson rose to fame. He refused to comply, making a case that government-compelled speech is tyrannical, which it objectively is. So, it does sound pretty much like an "omen of tyranny" to me. TBH, I'm not sure why any of this was included here, as it is arguably not pertinent to the book's thesis. And especially in a book that managed to avoid the thorny topic of political narrative up until that point... Finally, near the end of the book he talks about autism. The way he writes about it makes it seem as though it is advantageous; even somewhat of a superpower. He asserts that autists often have higher intelligence (I thought we didn't like IQ??) and wonders if autism could have "played a role in what made our species." Additionally, he cites the work of another scientist, who posits that "We know there must have been an element of positive selection for autism in the past." He chides society at large for propagating social norms that often leave people with autism to feel excluded, before asking: "Could autism be the next phase of human evolution?" He also writes: "Even today, the American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnosis and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, the DSM-IV, defines autism as a condition manifesting in an ‘abnormal development in social interaction and communication, and a markedly restricted repertoire of activity and interests.’ But I am reluctant to accept the words of a psychiatric organisation that as recently as 1968 defined homosexuality as ‘a mental disorder’." ~Where to begin with all this?? I'll go step by step. First of all, autism is on a spectrum. There are people that range (informally) from "highly functioning" to "low functioning." In a high-functioning autist, you might only observe some quirky social behaviours. Conversely, a low-functioning autist might present with limited or no verbal communication skills, and may not be able to live independently, requiring support from a caregiver throughout their lives. Although I have not seen a distributive curve for autism, I can only assume that it is Gaussian, and for every extremely high-functioning autist the author lauds here, there is likely another low-functioning one that will never even speak. Talk about cherry-picking. Secondly, his claim that autism could have played a role in what made our species is only bolstered by a tenuous observation in van Gogh's "The Starry Night" painting. The claim that "We know there must have been an element of positive selection for autism in the past" is contentious on its face, and might only be applicable to people whose autism elevated them above their non-autistic contemporaries; like a craftsman, scholar, musician, artist, etc. It is absurd to think that someone who is non-verbal and requires constant care as an adult would enjoy higher evolutionary fitness compared with someone who is not that way. Further, chastising society for having norms is about as productive as pissing into the wind. Societies amalgamate individuals into a broader group. In order for those individuals to be aligned in their goals and values, some form of social norms are necessary. Every society in history has had social norms, and taboos against breaking them. They are effectively the only way that a group of people can live in relative stability, and not become atomized and fractured. Complaining that the majority does not acquiesce to every demand of a small minority is both ridiculous, as well as completely impossible; theoretically and practically. By definition, if you start to move norms in any direction, you will be excluding some number of people in another. By shaping norms to accommodate some, you exclude others. Ray Bradbury talked about this in his famous book Fahrenheit 451. All societies have norms. That some people don't fit these norms is unfortunate, but advocating a ground-up change to the fabric of society doesn't seem like a particularly tenable solution to this problem to me. Moving on, him asking: "Could autism be the next phase of human evolution?" shows his naïveté of evolutionary theory. Human evolution would only move more towards becoming more autistic if it had a broad-based evolutionary advantage, which it arguably does not. Even on the surface, difficulty with communication and empathy are not pro-social traits. Since humans are extremely pro-social animals, any trait that goes against this is likely to be maladaptive, not adaptive. I thought this would be common sense... Finally, I'm not sure why the author takes a quote from the DSM IV in the quote above, while saying "even today." This book was published in 2022, and the DSM IV was been replaced by the DSM V in 2013. So, no "even today" we don't still cite the DSM IV. Definitely some slippery wording there, and it makes you wonder whether the author was trying to pull a fast one on the reader, or was actually unaware of the existence of the DSM V. I'm not sure which is worse... All of which can't help but call into question the credibility of his other claims. He uses slippery language often in the book, and makes many outlandish claims; too numerous to count. A few of the top reviews here go into more detail. I'm not a neuroscientist, and my level of expertise is "armchair" tier. If this book made me scratch my head a few times, it makes me wonder how much of the content here warrants further scrutiny. The topics covered here are: (Chapter titles) • Building the Human Brain • Inventing Emotions • Our Social Brains • The Genesis of Memory • The Truth About Intelligence • Creating Language • The Illusion of Consciousness • Different Minds • The iBrain ******************** I enjoyed most of How the Mind Changed. On balance, it was an informative book that covered a lot of ground. Sadly, there was a lot of contentious info presented here as though it were objectively true. I did not feel the author did a good enough job buttressing some of his more contentious claims. 3 stars. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Mar 27, 2025
|
Apr 02, 2025
|
Mar 26, 2025
|
Kindle Edition
| |||||||||||||||
B06ZY5STD6
| 4.12
| 24,211
| Oct 03, 2017
| Oct 03, 2017
|
it was amazing
|
"This is a book about the power of moments and the wisdom of shaping them..." The Power of Moments was a decent look into the topic. The book is my fou "This is a book about the power of moments and the wisdom of shaping them..." The Power of Moments was a decent look into the topic. The book is my fourth from the authors, and I've generally enjoyed their writing. The quote above appears near the start of the book. Authors Chip and Dan Heath are brothers. Chip Heath is the Thrive Foundation of Youth Professor of Organizational Behavior in the Graduate School of Business at Stanford University. Dan Heath is a Senior Fellow at Duke University’s CASE center, which supports social entrepreneurs. Chip and Dan Heath: [image] The Heath brothers write with an engaging and lively style that shouldn't struggle to hold the finicky reader's attention. I am very particular about how readable my books are, and thankfully this one passed muster. The authors drop this quote near the start of the book: "We all have defining moments in our lives—meaningful experiences that stand out in our memory. Many of them owe a great deal to chance: A lucky encounter with someone who becomes the love of your life. A new teacher who spots a talent you didn’t know you had. A sudden loss that upends the certainties of your life. A realization that you don’t want to spend one more day in your job. These moments seem to be the product of fate or luck or maybe a higher power’s interventions. We can’t control them. The aim of the book is talked about in this short blurb: "In this book, we have two goals: First, we want to examine defining moments and identify the traits they have in common. What, specifically, makes a particular experience memorable and meaningful? Our research shows that defining moments share a set of common elements. ******************** I enjoyed this book. I would recommend it to anyone interested. 5 stars. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Dec 17, 2024
|
Dec 19, 2024
|
Dec 12, 2024
|
Kindle Edition
| |||||||||||||||||
030683345X
| 9780306833458
| B0CTZQ9B17
| 3.66
| 101
| unknown
| Oct 01, 2024
|
it was ok
|
"The bottom line is simple: everyone is suggestible. Whether we realize it or not, suggestions hack our minds and shape our realities every day. By st
"The bottom line is simple: everyone is suggestible. Whether we realize it or not, suggestions hack our minds and shape our realities every day. By standing on the bridge between illusion and science, we can learn how to transition away from the realm of manipulation into taking better charge of our own subjectivity..." The Suggestible Brain was a fairly decent read, for the most part. Unfortunately, the author had to cram politics into the book for some reason. I really hate it when they do this, and my ratings always reflect this. More below. Author Amir Raz is a world-renowned expert on the science of suggestion with recent positions as Canada Research Chair, Professor of Psychiatry, Neurology and Neurosurgery, and Psychology at McGill University, and as Founding Director of The Institute for Interdisciplinary Brain and Behavioral Sciences at Chapman University. Amir Raz: [image] The book opens with a good intro; where Raz talks about performing as a magician. It's got a lively and engaging style that shouldn't struggle to hold the reader's attention. The author drops the quote at the start of this review early on, and it continues: "...Suggestion can make cheap wine taste like Château Margaux, warp our perception of time, and alter our memories. We know that psychedelic substances, illusions, and other dramatic effects can also alter our levels of suggestibility. But, paradoxically, being susceptible to suggestions hardly means we’re feeble-minded or gullible." In this quote he outlines the aim of the book: "Here, I share some of my best stories about the science of suggestion, the bread and butter of my professional life. Throughout my academic career, I have focused specifically on the role that suggestion plays in the effectiveness of psychiatric medications, alongside how attention, selfregulation, placebo phenomena, and expectations affect human consciousness. For example, sometimes placebos work even when people know that they are taking them. The fields of developmental psychopathology and transcultural psychiatry teach us how much our communities and social standards can shape our thoughts, emotions, and cognitive processing. And using imaging of the living human brain and other state-of-the-art techniques, my research has helped unravel the mental experiences of hypnosis and meditation." Some more of what is covered here includes: • Susceptibility tests • Placebo and nocebo • Wine tasting • Stanley Milgram's compliance experiments • Philip Zimbardo's prison experiments • The ethics of theatrical medicine • Lactose intolerance • False pregnancies, complete with swollen breasts and enlarged stomachs • The Reliable Science of Unreliable, Suggestible Memories • The malleability of memory; post-incident manipulation • The efficacy of antidepressants • Number needed to treat (NNT) • The Dark Side of Antidepressants • Psychedelics for Depression • Mass Suggestion and Social Contagion Unfortunately, he's got a bunch of mindless nonsense near the end of the book talking about supposed "implicit racial bias." Right off the bat, these "implicit bias" tests do not pass scientific rigour. Secondly, the author seems to think that in-group preferences are only problematic and applicable to white people. The human animal is a deeply tribal creature, and every ethnic group displays an in-group preference; to one degree or another. Finally, tribalism is not just constrained to ethnic groups. You can make people display tribal preferences with just one (or multiple) small identity markers. Some as simple as wearing a hat for a particular sports team, or a T shirt with a band name on it. Also, the author's proposed "solution" to this supposed "implicit bias" is to make sure black people are shown through a favourable lens, and white people through a non-favourable lens. Yes, really. He says: "...by repeatedly showing participants photographs of famous and respected Black people, such as Martin Luther King Jr., and photographs of infamous and disapproved white people, such as criminal and cult leader Charles Manson, negative attitudes waned by more than 50 percent.57 Similarly, videos of Black people during positive activities such as going to church or enjoying a family barbecue also reduced implicit bias.58 These early efforts to change the social context and, through it, reduce automatic prejudice and preference have paved the road to diversity education." ~So, your supposed plan to help reduce racial animosity is to switch the groups that the animosity is directed at around? What a brilliant idea, professor. And "diversity education" is supposed to be a good thing?? Forcing people into political re-education camps is a hallmark of Communist authoritarians. And we all know how well that worked out. Karl Marx, is that you?? The author then goes on to congratulate himself for this virtue-signalling SJW nonsense by saying that he developed a VR program that essentially body-swaps white people's appearance to that of black people. He pats himself on the back with this experiment and doesn't seem to find any problems with solely blaming white people for the problems in society. In fact, more of this type of stuff should be encouraged, according to him: "...In this way, and others, we can apply the science of suggestion—in a way that transcends lip service and performative activism—to result in real social impact, health outcomes, and political change." ~How great. Sounds like a utopia. And as history has shown us over and over, nothing ever goes wrong in the societal quest for utopia... Surely, nothing bad could come in trying to demoralize and demonize one group of people in favour of another in a multi-ethnic society. What a well-thought-out plan, with no possible downsides. That this person is teaching impressionable young minds scares the shit out of me. ******************** The book was going along fairly well, right up until the author pulled the curtain back on his tankie sympathies. I don't know why authors can't seem to put a leash on this kind of crap, other than that they are ideologically captured. And much like an Evangelical Christian who never shuts up about Jesus, these people just can't help themselves... So, 3.5 stars for most of the book, and 0 stars for the insertion of the author's shit-tier political evangelizing, for a total of 2 stars. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Nov 04, 2024
|
Nov 06, 2024
|
Nov 04, 2024
|
Kindle Edition
| |||||||||||||||
9798887700250
| B0BQYV7391
| 3.91
| 43
| unknown
| Mar 19, 2024
|
really liked it
|
“NOCEBO EFFECT” IS A DIFFICULT TERM TO DEFINE. It stems from the Latin word nocere, which translates roughly as “to harm.” Some experts view it as a k
“NOCEBO EFFECT” IS A DIFFICULT TERM TO DEFINE. It stems from the Latin word nocere, which translates roughly as “to harm.” Some experts view it as a kind of negative placebo effect in which the outcome is undesirable, such as a headache or stomachache, while the placebo effect, such as feeling less pain or depression, is desirable..." The Nocebo Effect was a decent look into an incredible phenomenon. Mindsets and expectations have real-world biological consequences that can be systemic. In extreme cases, a nocebo effect can cause death. This is a well-documented occurrence called "Voodoo death," or "psychogenic death." Author Michael Bernstein is an experimental psychologist and Assistant Professor in the Department of Diagnostic Imaging at Brown University’s Warren Alpert Medical School. He directs the Medical Expectations Lab at Brown. Michael Bernstein: [image] I have been fascinated by the concepts of placebo and nocebo for a long time. In an alternate universe, I have a life in academia, where I head up a Mindset Lab. But, I digress... I came across the book and the author on a recent appearance he made on Michael Shermer's Skeptic Podcast. The author drops the quote above in the book's intro, and it continues below: "...No surprise, then, that the nocebo effect has been called “the placebo effect’s evil twin.” In our view, the nocebo effect can be summarized as “the occurrence of a harmful event that stems from consciously or subconsciously expecting it.” The core of the nocebo effect is that adverse health effects occur as a result of negative expectations. Expectations come up in everyday conversation, like when you tell a friend that you’re stuck in traffic but expect to meet them for dinner in twenty minutes. But it’s also an important technical term that academics use (sometimes interchangeably with expectancy), and it was popularized by Dr. Irving Kirsch at Harvard University. Expectancies can teach us a lot about our behavior and actions. They are critical to our health and well-being. The nocebo effect, then, can be thought of as the scientific term for saying that when you expect to feel sick, you are more likely to feel sick." The book is presented as a compilation from many different authors, with Berstein as editor. The authors cover many well-known examples of nocebo and placebo; citing many scientific studies as they go. Some of what they cover here includes: • The above-mentioned "psychogenic death" • The number 4 in Asian cultures • "Havana Syndrome." Some good writing here, however, some of these victims actually had TBIs. I'm not sure if a TBI is something that nocebo can produce. • The ethics of placebo and nocebo treatments • Modern medicine and nocebo. Clinicians setting negative self-fulfilling expectations • EMF exposure. There is no plausible mechanism of harm, as these EMFs are non-ionizing radiation • Statins Unfortunately, despite the book fielding such incredibly rich and interesting source material, I found quite a lot of the writing here a bit dry for my tastes. A subjective take, for sure, and I'm very picky on how readable my books are. ******************** The Nocebo Effect was still a good read, despite my minor gripe. I would easily recommend it. 4.5 stars. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Oct 31, 2024
|
Nov 2024
|
Oct 30, 2024
|
Kindle Edition
| ||||||||||||||||
B0DN86HN6H
| 3.70
| 1,356
| Jan 14, 2020
| unknown
|
it was ok
|
"Nothing pisses me off more than being angry..." Unfuck Your Anger sounded promising, but the finished product left me frustrated (I'll see myself out) "Nothing pisses me off more than being angry..." Unfuck Your Anger sounded promising, but the finished product left me frustrated (I'll see myself out). Author Faith G. Harper, PhD, LPC-S, ACS, ACN is a bad-ass, funny lady (well, at least according to this write-up) with a PhD. She’s a licensed professional counselor, board supervisor, certified sexologist, and applied clinical nutritionist with a private practice and consulting business in San Antonio, TX. Faith G. Harper: [image] As the book's title hints at, the writing here focuses on anger; its different types, how to deal with it, and how to incorporate forgiveness into your worldview. It is a shorter presentation. The audio version I have clocked in at just over 2 hours. She drops this quote, outlining the aim of the book: "In this book, we are going to discuss the common triggers of anger, using some new research on the brain’s rage circuits. Then we are going to look at what happens in our body when we have an anger response. After the science-y part of what anger is, we’re gonna do the unfuckening part. Also, as you might guess from the bold use of the F word in the book's title, the writing here is replete with expletives. Now, I'm just about the farthest thing from a pearl-clutcher who takes "offense" at course language, but a lot of it was over the top here. She's got swear words liberally crammed in, even where they don't belong. I think she is trying to sound "cool" employing this style. Unfortunately, this kind of thing is pretty hard to pull off effectively, and it didn't work here. Instead of sounding down-to-earth and funny, I found it just grew tiresome and grating. Also, I did not find too much value in this short presentation. Most of the material was garden-variety stuff you've read just about anywhere else. Finally, there was the inclusion of a decent amount of ideologically-laden jargon here. I can't stand when authors editorialize and insert their political opinions into books where they have no place being, and my ratings always reflect this. The author drops ideological jargon numerous times here, including this noteworthy word salad: "By shifting from irritation and defensiveness, he validated the experiences of the individuals who have been victimized, which lent support to social change. ******************** I didn't like Unfuck Your Anger, for the reasons above. Thankfully it was not a long book, or I would have put it down. Remind me to take a hard pass on anything else this author produces. 1.5 stars ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Oct 16, 2024
|
Oct 17, 2024
|
Oct 16, 2024
|
ebook
| |||||||||||||||||
1472148606
| 9781472148605
| B0BXWRT37P
| 3.80
| 1,605
| unknown
| Sep 07, 2023
|
it was amazing
|
"The word “mindfulness” has become ubiquitous since my early work in the 1970s. It’s hard to open a newspaper or magazine, or even listen to an interv
"The word “mindfulness” has become ubiquitous since my early work in the 1970s. It’s hard to open a newspaper or magazine, or even listen to an interview, without the word “mindful” being used..." The Mindful Body was a super-interesting read. The book is my fourth from the author, all of which I really enjoyed. I love the work of Ellen Langer. Her experiments and razor-sharp analysis are a breath of fresh air. Ellen J. Langer is an American professor of psychology at Harvard University; in 1981, she became the first woman ever to be tenured in psychology at Harvard. Langer studies the illusion of control, decision-making, aging, and mindfulness theory. She is known as "the mother of positive psychology". She is also a member of the psychology department at Harvard University and a painter, she lives in Cambridge, Massachusetts. Ellen J. Langer: [image] Langer is a super thoughtful and intelligent mind. She brings a sharp set of analytical tools to bear in addressing many stories and assumptions that those in the public, as well as academic and medical fields hold. In a theme that Langer explores in her other work; mindsets play a central role in this book. She drops the quote at the start of this review early on, and it continues: "...Most of this usage presents mindfulness as a condition solely of the mind and often related to the practice of meditation. But mindfulness—as my students and I have shown—is instead the simple process of actively noticing things, no meditation required. When mindful, we notice things we didn’t notice before, and we come to see that we didn’t know the things we thought we knew as well as we thought we knew them. Everything becomes interesting and potentially useful in a new way..." Interestingly enough, despite our advanced technology and scientific progress, we still have virtually zero understanding of many of the brain's complex processes. In this case; specifically how the brain and body interface. The placebo effect is a well-known and well-evidenced phenomenon that appears throughout all medicine. Before a drug is approved for market, it must show efficacy above placebo. That's because placebo always demonstrates some efficacy. Conversely, there is something called the "nocebo effect," which is the inverse of the placebo. If you think the placebo will improve your health outcome, it will. If you think the intervention will have a negative effect on you (nocebo), it also will. This is a central theme of the book, and Langer spends most of her time here taking a deep dive into these unbelievable mechanisms. She tells the reader about some incredible studies that her lab has done in this emerging area of research. She drops this quote: "But my use of the word “mindfulness” also, importantly, refers to a condition of the body. Indeed, I believe our psychology may be the most important determinant of our health. I’m not just speaking of harmony between mind and body. I believe the mind and body comprise a single system, and every change in the human being is essentially simultaneously a change at the level of the mind (that is, a cognitive change) as well as the body (a hormonal, neural, and/or behavioral change). When we open our minds to this idea of mind-body unity, new possibilities for controlling our health become real. Making use of the power of a mindful body is well within our grasp." And this one (one of my all-time faves), speaking to how the scientific community has received this research at large: "Schopenhauer is presumed to have said, “All research passes through three phases: First it is ridiculed; then it is violently opposed; and third it is accepted as self-evident.” The contents of the book are: (view spoiler)[ The Social Construction of Rules Almost Counts: The Hidden Costs of the Borderline Effect The Myth of Risk-Taking Actor or Observer? Risk and Prediction The Arbitrariness of Interpreting Risk The Illusion of Control What Can We Control? Mindful Optimism Is “Normal Distribution” Normal? Just Try Harder Sorting Winners and Losers Someone Else’s Shoes: The Problem with Perspective Taking Decision Systems Infinite Regress Making the Decision Right No Wrong Decision When Decisions Matter The Unreliability of Probability Why Regrets? No Right Decisions Guesses, Predictions, Choices, and Decisions Trying or Doing? Blame and Forgiveness Finding Meaning Mind-Body Dualism A More Complete Mind-Body Unity Testing Mind-Body Unity Powers of Perception Embodied Cognition The Mind and the Senses Imagined Eating Imaginary Exercise Interesting Possibilities Placebo Power Strong Medicine Who Do You Believe? Spontaneous Remissions Embodying the Mind Attention to Variability, Uncertainty, and Mindfulness Symptom Variability Healing Is a Matter of Opportunity Catching Mindfulness Sensitivity to Mindfulness Mindful Contagion and Health Our Senses Something in the Air A New Approach to Health Mindful Medicine Mental Health Mindful Hospitals Unimpossible (hide spoiler)] ******************** The Mindful Body was a another excellent work from the author. I would definitely recommend it to anyone interested. 5 stars, and a spot on my "favorites" shelf. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Oct 09, 2024
|
Oct 15, 2024
|
Oct 04, 2024
|
Kindle Edition
| |||||||||||||||
1119750830
| 9781119750833
| 1119750830
| 4.00
| 78
| unknown
| Apr 12, 2021
|
it was amazing
|
"For far too long, mindfulness in the West has been nearly exclusively associated with spirituality and/or wellness..." Mindfulness Without the Bells a "For far too long, mindfulness in the West has been nearly exclusively associated with spirituality and/or wellness..." Mindfulness Without the Bells and Beads was a great book on the topic. I love reading about mindset, performance, mindfulness, and other related topics across the health and wellness sphere, so I put this one on my list when I came across it. Author Clif Smith is a US Army veteran, former diplomat and business executive, and career intelligence officer who currently serves as Chief, Enterprise Learning Solutions, Academy for Defense Intelligence, within the Defense Intelligence Agency. Clif Smith: [image] Smith writes with an effective style, that I found both informative and engaging. I am super picky about how readable my books are, and thankfully this one passed muster. It won't have trouble holding the finicky reader's attention. The audiobook version I have was also read by the author, which was a nice touch. He's a great speaker and did a very good job of the narration. He gets the writing here off on a good foot with a well-written intro. He drops an interesting analogy about the staggered starting lanes on an elliptical running track. Smith drops the quote at the start of this review, and it continues: "...People seeking enlightenment or relief from stress, anxiety, and pain have been the primary audience. He also drops this quote early on: "I don't know why you picked up this book, but given the title it might be that you've had the thought, “What the hell is all the hype about mindfulness?” You may be one of the millions of people who have been curious about mindfulness but don't want to be associated with the spiritual crowd that so often drowns out its core meaning. Perhaps you recoil at the thought of listening to someone breathlessly guide meditations in a sickly sweet voice. Maybe you thought you'd need to join a yoga studio and get a subscription for monthly deliveries of incense. If any of those have been keeping you from trying out mindfulness, this book is for you. In these pages, I peel back the layers of hype and hyperbole about mindfulness and provide a practical and demystified approach to reaping the real benefits from a consistent mindfulness practice over just an 8-week period. Although it sounds simple and obvious on its face, the state of being "mindful" is pretty much the polar opposite mindset of the average modern, Western citizen - who goes through much of their waking life with the lights on, but no one home... People develop routines, and then go through the minutia of their day on a form of autopilot. So just what is "mindfulness"? "Mindfulness is an ability to keep attention on one's present moment experience without getting too caught up in automatic thoughts and judgments." The book's subtitle is expanded upon in this bit of writing: "Attending my first mindfulness teacher training course was quite a shock. In the morning on the first day, the teachers came into the room holding small bells, wearing Buddhist beads, and carrying special cushions on which they meditated. This struck me as odd, because I had signed up for the “secular” mindfulness teacher training. It did not take long to gather that this “secular” training was going to be deeply intertwined with overtly spiritual and new-age thoughts, positions, and perspectives. There were–I kid you not–even Tarot card readings at an evening event and scores of participant comments during the training were met with the response, “That's so beautiful.” If you want to turn off a corporate audience and never be invited back beyond what your original contract stipulated, just do what's in this paragraph." I have been actively reading about mindfulness for a few years now, and already incorporate daily mindfulness practices into my life. I've found the quality of my thoughts, and my daily life have become more enriched as a result. In Jay Shetty's book: Think Like a Monk, he says in the Ashram, the Master told them to notice 3 new things every time on their routine daily walk through the garden. I do this myself as well when I walk or jog around my neighbourhood. The benefits of mindfulness training are numerous, and Smith drops this quote: "As you progress through the book and do the exercises, you can gain a greater ability to respond thoughtfully and calmly in the midst of high-pressure and complex situations, become more agile in the face of change, and pay more attention to the things you deem most important. You will learn practices that are known to lead to enhanced mental focus, empathy, and resilience. Through consistent practice, you can become aware of some of your self-created challenges and learn ways to avoid automatically falling into the same patterns so you can get out of your own way. You will learn ways to be less affected by unhelpful internal dialogue, limiting beliefs, and irrational feelings of fear (failure, embarrassment, and criticism), allowing you to see and seize opportunities to grow beyond what you previously thought possible and unlock your latent potential. Finally, you'll also begin to be able to connect with people around you more fully and effectively. These benefits cascade and compound, resulting in improvements in performance, leadership, and well-being." Some more of what the author talks about here includes: • People's inborn negativity bias • Mindfulness Changes the Brain • Focused Attention Meditation • Open Awareness Meditation • Diving Deeper: An 8-Week Journey to Exceptional Performance, Leadership, and Well-Being • Body Scan Meditation • Mindfulness of Sounds, Thoughts, and Emotions • Empathy • Compassion • Kindness • A Mindful Day ******************** Mindfulness Without the Bells and Beads was a well done dive into the topic. I would recommend it to anyone interested in becoming more Mindful. 4.5 stars. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Oct 02, 2024
|
Oct 07, 2024
|
Oct 02, 2024
|
Kindle Edition
| |||||||||||||||
1324036184
| 9781324036180
| 1324036184
| 3.87
| 1,215
| Aug 27, 2024
| Aug 27, 2024
|
really liked it
|
"Music affects the biology of the brain, through its activation of specialized neural pathways, its synchronization of the firing patterns of neural a
"Music affects the biology of the brain, through its activation of specialized neural pathways, its synchronization of the firing patterns of neural assemblies, and its modulation of key neurotransmitters and hormones. Together, these drive a range of changes that are important to our survival and well-being. Music promotes relaxation when we’re stressed; it can reduce blood pressure or make diabetes management easier; it soothes us when we’re depressed and energizes us for exercise..." I Heard There Was a Secret Chord was an interesting book. I am a huge music fan; both playing and listening. So, I'll read just about any book about music that I can get my hands on. Author Daniel Joseph Levitin, FRSC is an American-Canadian polymath, cognitive psychologist, neuroscientist, writer, musician, and record producer. Daniel Joseph Levitin: [image] Levitin writes with a fairly decent style here, although he does have a tendency to go off on tangents a bit. He drops the quote above near the start of the book, and it continues: "Engaging with music, whether as a listener or a player, facilitates entry into the brain’s Default Mode Network (DMN), a path to the subconscious that is instrumental to everything from problem-solving to relaxation, from creativity to immune system function. And for many, music can connect us to a sense of a higher power, of great and enduring beauty, and listening to or playing it can provide some of the most exhilarating and meaningful moments of our lives." The book contains a lot of writing on neuroscience, and despite its somewhat niche-sounding title, the scope of the writing here is quite broad. Some of what is covered here includes: • THE NEUROANATOMY OF MUSIC • MUSICAL MEMORY • ATTENTION • THE BRAIN’S “DEFAULT MODE,” INTROSPECTION, AND MEDITATION • Music, Movement, and Movement Disorders • Parkinson’s Disease • Trauma • Mental Health • Memory Loss, Dementia, Alzheimer’s Disease, and Stroke • Pain • Neurodevelopmental Disorders • Learning How to Fly • Music in Everyday Life • Fate Knocking on Your Door • PRÉCIS TO A THEORY OF MUSICAL MEANING • Music Medicine, Mystery, and Possibility Despite containing a ton of interesting info, I found the book lacking cohesion. There were too many rambling tangents. IMO, the book needed a better editing for the sake of both cohesion and brevity. A subjective criticism, to be sure, so don't let it dissuade you from reading this one if you are interested, as there is still a ton of fascinating material covered here. ******************** I Heard There Was a Secret Chord was an interesting look into the topic. I would recommend it. 4 stars. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Oct 23, 2024
|
Oct 28, 2024
|
Sep 30, 2024
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
030759016X
| 9780307590169
| B0030DHPGQ
| 4.03
| 54,336
| Feb 16, 2010
| Feb 16, 2010
|
really liked it
|
"For individuals’ behavior to change, you’ve got to influence not only their environment but their hearts and minds. The problem is this: Often the hea "For individuals’ behavior to change, you’ve got to influence not only their environment but their hearts and minds. The problem is this: Often the heart and mind disagree. Fervently..." Switch was a decent look into the topic. The book is my third from the authors, after their 2013 book: Decisive: How to Make Better Choices in Life and Work, and their 2007 book: Made to Stick: Why Some Ideas Survive and Others Die. The quote above appears near the start of the book. Authors Chip and Dan Heath are brothers. Chip Heath is the Thrive Foundation of Youth Professor of Organizational Behavior in the Graduate School of Business at Stanford University. Dan Heath is a Senior Fellow at Duke University’s CASE center, which supports social entrepreneurs. Chip and Dan Heath: [image] The aim of the book is laid out in this bit of writing: "This is a book to help you change things. We consider change at every level—individual, organizational, and societal. Maybe you want to help your brother beat his gambling addiction. Maybe you need your team at work to act more frugally because of market conditions. Maybe you wish more of your neighbors would bike to work. A central theme introduced early on is psychologist Jonathon Haidt's "rider and elephant" paradigm. Basically; there are two independent “always-on” sides of our brain. One is the emotional side, the other the rational side. The emotional side is the Elephant, the rational side is the Rider. The Rider of the Elephant may think they're in charge, but when there’s a disagreement, the Elephant usually wins... The authors have also got an interesting bit of writing about a study that researchers Ellen Langer and Alia Crum did. The study (linked here) raised an interesting discussion about the power of placebo. In a podcast appearance discussing the study, Crum said that her colleague Ellen Langer (known as the "Mother of Positive Psychology") said that exercise was "a placebo," as this study seemed to indicate. This is a dubious assertion, that (as much respect as I have for Langer) rubbed me the wrong way. The authors here did a good breakdown of that study and its likely mechanisms of actions. Some great writing here. A small point of contention: The author repeatedly uses the example of skim milk being healthier than whole milk; due to its lower saturated fat content. The saturated fat debate is pretty contentious and thorny, from what I've read, and I'm not sure that skim milk is -in fact, more healthy than whole milk - other factors considered equally. While skim milk contains less saturated fat, I'm not sure that whole milk is inherently worse for you than skim, other than it may cause you to ingest too many calories. Unfortunately, I also found some of the writing to be fairly dry here. I am admittedly very picky about how readable my books are, and this one had my finicky attention wandering a few times. There was too much blow-by-blow accounting of countless different business decisions, and related minutia. The book also could have had better narrative continuity and structure. And although there was a lot of interesting material, it got lost in the woods at times. ******************** Switch was a decent book, but I found some of the book long-winded and tedious... Don't let this dissuade you from reading it if you are interested, bc there is still a good amount of advice here. 3.5 stars. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Oct 2024
|
Oct 02, 2024
|
Sep 27, 2024
|
Kindle Edition
| |||||||||||||||
139852638X
| 9781398526389
| 139852638X
| 3.86
| 287
| Mar 14, 2024
| Jul 03, 2024
|
it was amazing
|
"Have you noticed how happy most young children are? They seem to delight in the simplest things. Puddles, dirt, snow, twigs. At the back of my office
"Have you noticed how happy most young children are? They seem to delight in the simplest things. Puddles, dirt, snow, twigs. At the back of my office is a junior school playground. Every break, it is filled with the laughter and squeals of young children at play. Where does all that joy go? We start off happy as young children but many of us turn into unhappy adults, dissatisfied with our lives. Even when things are going well for us, genuine and sustained happiness can feel elusive. Why is this, and what, if anything, can be done about it?" The Science of Happiness was an excellent read. The source material from the book draws mostly from research in modern psychology and social psychology. I first came across the author on a 2024 appearance he made on Michael Shermer's Skeptic Podcast, which I also enjoyed. Author Bruce MacFarlane Hood is a Canadian-born British experimental psychologist and philosopher who specialises in developmental cognitive neuroscience. Bruce Hood: [image] The author opens the book with a good intro, setting the tone for the rest of the writing to follow. The book is written with an engaging and interesting style, and I found it to be very readable. This one won't struggle to hold the finicky reader's attention. There was lots of interesting ground covered here, and excellent writing overall. Hood drops the quote above near the start of the book, and expands on its aim in this short blurb: "Since my course was about the scientific approach to understanding happiness, I included studies that sought to explain human behaviour in terms of the underlying mechanisms in the brain. My own areas of interest – child development, the self and neuroscience – played central roles. I wanted to share my passion for the power of data and evidence, so I included lectures on statistics and experimental design to demonstrate how science is the best way to discover truths in the world. Unlike many positive psychology advocates, I was cautious not to oversell the promise of the principles I was teaching. I was determined to approach the Science of Happiness as rigorously as possible, so I had the audience participate in psychometric tests before and after the course to determine whether the recommended activities made any difference to their happiness. I informed them that they were taking part in their own experiment and the outcome would determine the future of the course. And I promised: if it didn’t work, I would abandon the course and return to my studies." I found the formatting of this one to be well done, as well. It opens with an intro, and is split into seven "lessons." At the end, he closes with an epilogue. He explains: "Across the seven lessons, you will learn that a balance needs to be struck between our egocentric viewpoint and adopting a more allocentric perspective. The book begins by giving the reader an analysis of the young child, as per the quote at the start of this review. Young children are mostly happy because they are ego-centric and have not yet learned to incorporate ideas of the self into the broader social landscape. They have yet to become anxious about the future, and have not started to compare themselves to their peers in meaningful competitive ways. From here, the book talks about some evolutionary and social psychology. Along the way, Hood covers many famous studies from psychology and social psychology. The seven lessons covered here are: • Alter Your Ego. • Avoid Isolation. • Reject Negative Comparisons. • Become More Optimistic. • Control Your Attention. • Connect With Others. • Get Out of Your Own Head. ******************** I really enjoyed The Science of Happiness. It was well researched, written, and presented. I would definitely recommend this one. The book is a great example of science writing properly done. 5 stars, and a spot on my "favorites" shelf. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Apr 17, 2025
|
Apr 23, 2025
|
Sep 04, 2024
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
0393355578
| 9780393355574
| 0393355578
| 3.97
| 14,067
| Feb 07, 2017
| Feb 20, 2018
|
it was amazing
|
"We don’t experience natural environments enough to realize how restored they can make us feel, nor are we aware that studies also show they make us h
"We don’t experience natural environments enough to realize how restored they can make us feel, nor are we aware that studies also show they make us healthier, more creative, more empathetic and more apt to engage with the world and with each other. Nature, it turns out, is good for civilization." I really enjoyed The Nature Fix. It was a very well-done book; all around. The author did a great job in the research, writing, editing and final presentation of the material. As society becomes more prosperous, larger numbers of people leave the countryside and head for the economic opportunities offered in metropolitan areas. Also, in a broad-based trend across all Western and non-Western advanced countries, people are been spending less time outdoors and immersing themselves in nature. In what is likely an evolutionary mismatch, this broad change will have wide-ranging effects on the population at large. Author Florence Williams is an American journalist and nonfiction writer whose work focuses on the environment, health and science. Florence Williams: [image] Williams opens the book with a good intro, where she talks about biologist E.O. Wilson's concept of "biophilia." She writes with a decent style, and this one should have no trouble keeping the finicky reader engaged. "Biophilia explains why even today we build houses on the lake, why every child wants a teddy bear, and why Apple names itself after a fruit and its software after noble predators, surfing spots and national parks. The company is brilliant at instilling biophilic longing and affiliation at the very same time it lures us inside." She continues: "This book explores the science behind what poets and philosophers have known for eons: place matters. Aristotle believed walks in the open air clarified the mind. Darwin, Tesla and Einstein walked in gardens and groves to help them think. Teddy Roosevelt, one of the most hyperproductive presidents of all time, would escape for months to the open country. On some level they all fought a tendency to be “tired, nerve-shaken, over-civilized people” as hikerphilosopher John Muir put it in 1901." And outlines the structure of the book's contents in this quote: "I’ve divided the book into five parts to help make sense of the material, and to make it useful. The first part sets up the two dominant theories that attempt to explain why our brains need nature and that drive much of the research: the first chapter takes us to Japan, where researchers are quantifying nature’s role in lowering stress and boosting mental health using a framework based on the biophilia hypothesis, the idea that we feel most “at home” in nature because we evolved there. The second chapter swerves over to Utah, where American neuroscientists are more interested in how nature helps restore our attention-addled brains to a state of sharper cognition. I’ve organized the rest of the book by nature dose. I explore the immediate effects of quick bursts, or “nearby nature” on our three main senses—smell, sound, sight. Then I look at what happens to our brains and bodies when we hang outside a bit longer to approximate the Finnish recommended nature dose: five hours a month. In Part Four, I take a deeper, longer dive into the wilderness, where really interesting things happen to our brains. This is where, in the words of neuroscientist David Strayer at the University of Utah, “something profound is going on.” Finally, we’ll look at what it all means to the way most of us live, in cities." Some more of what the author covers here includes: • The Japanese practice of "shinrin yoku," or “forest bathing” • The three different brain networks: the executive network, the spatial network, and the default network • Official healing forests in South Korea • Aromatherapy • The effects of persistent noise pollution • The positive effects of listening to nature sounds: wind, water and birds • Fractals • The Finnish; their connection to nature • Scotland • The positive effects of exercise • Wilderness, Creativity and the Power of Awe • Water on the Brain • The effects of time in nature on young brains • The importance of trees ****************** The Nature Fix. was a well-done book . I would definitely recommend it to anyone interested. 5 stars. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Jul 31, 2024
|
Aug 06, 2024
|
Jul 24, 2024
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
B0CVBJV3ZF
| 3.70
| 699
| unknown
| Mar 14, 2024
|
did not like it
|
Despite its short length, Neurodiversity and the Myth of Normal was a really shoddy presentation. While there was some interesting content presented h
Despite its short length, Neurodiversity and the Myth of Normal was a really shoddy presentation. While there was some interesting content presented here; mainly early on, there were some fairly sizeable structural problems with the overall presentation. More below. Co-author Kyler Shumway a professional writer, and psychotherapy practice developer. Co-author Daniel Wendler, MA is a doctoral student in Clinical Psychology and the founder of MarketingforTherapists.org. Kyler Shumway & Daniel Wendler: [image] The book is an audio presentation, so I won't be including the quotes I typically add to my reviews. It is also a shorter presentation; clocking in at a little less than 3 hours. As the books title implies, the authors unfold a theory of neurodiversity. Although not summarized exactly this way here (and it should have been); the theory is that modern science does not know enough about the workings of the human brain to be able to tell what "normal" neural functioning looks like, compared with pathological functioning. The authors talk about ADHD and autism a lot in the first part of the book, using these case studies to explain how people are differently wired. Ok, so all good so far. Right up until they started editorializing... The authors are self-loathing leftist "progressives" who subscribe to Neo-Marxist "intersectionality." They have been thoroughly parasitized by the Woke Mind Virus. And, as is oh-so fashionable in 2024, they spare no opportunity to push their political narrative here; with frustrating results. Many people on the autistic spectrum don't behave according to social norms. Autism is primarily a disorder associated with reduced empathy, so autistic people often miss the social cues that non-autistic people take for granted in their interactions with others. The authors talk about the "harm" caused by people trying to "mask" these abnormal behaviours; making a victimology claim. This may be true, but people are social animals. Every aspect of human behavior is strongly influenced by culture. All of our expectations, behaviours, decisions, and habits are strongly influenced by the group. Every society has norms and taboos. They are a foundational part of any social group. The authors don't seem to like this, and use magical thinking to wish that this wasn't so. Encouraging autistic people to behave normally may cause them some distress, but encouraging them to not conform also has downsides. Namely; rejection and ostracism from the group; which is arguably more damaging than having to internalize your abnormal behaviour. It's not a black and white issue... Ridiculously enough, these authors think that it is the entire world and the majority of people that need to change to accommodate everyone's specific preferences, and not the other way around. How would this even work in practice?? By definition, you can't please every minority group there is, because for every special need or preference that you accommodate, you'll end up displeasing someone else's needs or accommodations. This is not a feasible strategy. These two accredited academics don't seem to realize this obvious reality. Also, unfortunately, there was a plethora of leftist newspeak in here. Terms like "starting a conversation" "creating space," "marginalized," and other assorted ideological language was liberally peppered in the writing. I really don't like political language in a book, as it typically indicates that the author has been ideologically captured. And these guys clearly have been. They've got a ridiculous bit of writing saying "when we give someone the "psychosis" label, it makes it ok for the police to haul them off to jail." Umm, no. People are not just carted off to jail for no reason. They are taken to jail for criminal behaviour. If a psychotic person is arrested, it is because they are a threat to themselves or others. What should we do when someone who is detached from reality (the definition of a psychotic episode) is posing a danger to society? Just leave them alone and hope for the best?? This is airy-fairy utopian nonsense. Interestingly, most normal people wouldn't advocate for such nonsense. It takes a certain amount of education to become so stupid. “Some ideas are so stupid that only intellectuals believe them...” The authors also have some garbage in here about gender ideology. They trot out the fact that there are intersex people as "evidence" for the fact that sex and gender are completely uncorrelated. Human beings are sexually dimorphic, sexually reproducing creatures, with 2 default phenotypes. The binary idea of sex is not flawed. The overwhelming majority of people are either XX or XY. Even when intersex and sex chromosome aneuploidies are taken into account, M-F still applies to ~99.9% of the population. They also mention that brain scans show that the brains of trans people more closely resemble the brains of the sex they identify as, and cis people's brains more typically resemble the brains of their biological sex. The first problem with the entire "brain scan" line is thinking that there is a "male brain" and a "female brain." There are effeminate men, and there are masculine women. The amount of overlap between the brains of the sexes is so vast that trying to dichotomize the two is not workable. Disposition is not "gender." Dr. Kenneth Zucker, one of the world's leading gender researchers has a great bit of writing about this in Abigail Shrier's book Irreversible Damage: The Transgender Craze Seducing Our Daughters. They trot out some stats that say that >20% of Gen Z, >10% of millennials, 4.2% of Gen X and only 2.6% of Baby Boomers identify as LGBT+. The authors say that this discrepancy is reflective of stigma. It doesn't seem to occur to them that this parabolic rise in these numbers over the last few decades may also have social influence as a causal factor. We get the result we want first, and then go backwards to establish causation. Great "science," guys. They've also got a bit of writing in here about obtaining "enthusiastic consent" for sex. What the fuck does this have to do with neurodiversity?? Answer: ABSOLUTELY NOTHING. But, much like an evangelical Christian who never shuts up about Jesus, these people just can't help themselves. Ideology is a hell of a drug, kids... Sadly, ideologues ramming their shit political takes down your throat has spilled out of academia and Hollywood, and is becoming more and more commonplace in books... ****************** I had high hopes for Neurodiversity and the Myth of Normal, but it ultimately fell way short. I would not recommend it. There's not much real value here. Instead of using the <3 hours of this book's runtime to talk about the science of neurodiversity, the authors spend most of this short time evangelizing for a worldview. How tiresome... 1 star, and off to the return bin. Remind me to give a hard pass on anything else these guys produce. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Jun 21, 2024
|
Jun 25, 2024
|
Jun 21, 2024
|
Audible Audio
|
|
|
|
|
|
my rating |
|
|
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.08
|
it was amazing
|
Jun 30, 2025
|
Jun 23, 2025
|
||||||
3.85
|
liked it
|
Jun 18, 2025
|
Jun 12, 2025
|
||||||
3.81
|
liked it
|
Jun 11, 2025
|
Jun 05, 2025
|
||||||
4.30
|
it was amazing
|
May 30, 2025
|
May 27, 2025
|
||||||
3.73
|
it was amazing
|
Jul 24, 2025
|
May 22, 2025
|
||||||
3.80
|
it was ok
|
May 14, 2025
|
May 01, 2025
|
||||||
4.01
|
it was amazing
|
Apr 17, 2025
|
Apr 14, 2025
|
||||||
4.15
|
did not like it
|
Apr 15, 2025
|
Apr 10, 2025
|
||||||
4.07
|
liked it
|
Apr 02, 2025
|
Mar 26, 2025
|
||||||
4.12
|
it was amazing
|
Dec 19, 2024
|
Dec 12, 2024
|
||||||
3.66
|
it was ok
|
Nov 06, 2024
|
Nov 04, 2024
|
||||||
3.91
|
really liked it
|
Nov 2024
|
Oct 30, 2024
|
||||||
3.70
|
it was ok
|
Oct 17, 2024
|
Oct 16, 2024
|
||||||
3.80
|
it was amazing
|
Oct 15, 2024
|
Oct 04, 2024
|
||||||
4.00
|
it was amazing
|
Oct 07, 2024
|
Oct 02, 2024
|
||||||
3.87
|
really liked it
|
Oct 28, 2024
|
Sep 30, 2024
|
||||||
4.03
|
really liked it
|
Oct 02, 2024
|
Sep 27, 2024
|
||||||
3.86
|
it was amazing
|
Apr 23, 2025
|
Sep 04, 2024
|
||||||
3.97
|
it was amazing
|
Aug 06, 2024
|
Jul 24, 2024
|
||||||
3.70
|
did not like it
|
Jun 25, 2024
|
Jun 21, 2024
|