This one was a bit of a mixed bag for me. So I'll go through the "good" before I get to the "bad". Author Niko Vorobyov is a former purveyor of narcotiThis one was a bit of a mixed bag for me. So I'll go through the "good" before I get to the "bad". Author Niko Vorobyov is a former purveyor of narcotics who has done time in prison for dealing drugs. He talks about this in the book.
The Good: * There is some very interesting writing. I found the writing about his journey to Culiacán, and it's Narco culture to be particularly interesting. I have been following Mexican Narco culture for a while, and always like hearing new information, and new stories. * The book covers quite a lot of ground; The Philippines, Mexico, Albania, America, Portugal, and many topics and areas in between. * There is quite a lot of historical information here. While I take issue with the framing of some of it, there will no doubt be a decent amount of new information for many, if not most readers of this book.
The Bad: * My biggest criticism of the book is that the writing was a bit too jumpy for my tastes; the book erratically moves from one topic/region to the next in a somewhat impromptu, off-the-cuff fashion. It could have done with much better editing and/or formatting, IMO. * He's got a ridiculous bit of "reasoning" about how a drug addict's stereotypical degenerate and criminal behavior is the fault of... (wait for it) people who stereotype drug abusers, in a form of self-fulfilling prophecy. LMAO. What a shit take. * I wanted to enjoy a book about drug culture, but the author managed to inject his political narrative into this story, somehow. I really hate it when books do this. There's a somewhat ridiculous chapter in the book called "Black Lives Matter" (yes, really). Here we get to listen to Vorobyov evangelize for the religion of anti-racism. He includes virtue-signaling quotes about how white lives inherently matter, but black lives do not. Typical low-resolution pablum. He goes on about how unfair it is that a disproportionate amount of black people are in prison, citing many different stats. He conveniently leaves out any stats on the disparate rates of crime by race or ethnicity, which might bear out a causal relationship between incarceration and crime. He also goes on to talk about the death of Micheal Brown ridiculously, calling the 6'4", ~300lb young man an "unarmed teenager", in a slippery bit of wording. As if someone that large (or any size) needs to be "armed" to represent a threat. Brown's autopsy collaborated Officer Wilson's account; namely that Brown was shot in the top of his head close range, as he charged Officer Darren Wilson.
All of which is beside the point, to be honest. The point is that I didn't buy a book about "Adventures in the Global Drug Trade" to hear partisan political rhetoric, shit takes on race relations, and long-form White Guilt™. Terrible...
So while I had high hopes for this one, the jumbled formatting, and inclusion of the author's leftist evangelizing kind of ruined it for me. 1.5 stars, rounded down to 1....more
I liked this one. It is presented as an audiobook, but the format is very much like the audio of a mini-documentary series. It would have been great tI liked this one. It is presented as an audiobook, but the format is very much like the audio of a mini-documentary series. It would have been great to have a complimentary video series for this one. As the title promises, it is a brief foray into the world of the Dark Web. Investigative journalist Geoff White tells the listener about tor browsers, the Silk Road, and many other things Dark Web here. He talks about the history of the Dark Web; it's creation, how it became popular, and who uses it most now - from users wanting anonymity, to hackers and criminals.
The series is 10 episodes long, each ~30mins: • The Dark Web, Episode 1: The Birth of The Dark Web • The Dark Web, Episode 2: The Untold Story of The Dark Web • The Dark Web, Episode 3: Bitcoin's Days Are Numbered • The Dark Web, Episode 4: How Not to Buy a Gun on The Dark Web • The Dark Web, Episode 5: Hackers For Hire • The Dark Web, Episode 6: The Virus Kingpin • The Dark Web, Episode 7: Cyber Crime Inc. • The Dark Web, Episode 8: The Child Porn Paradox • The Dark Web, Episode 9: A Dark Force For Good • The Dark Web, Episode 10: Anonymity on Trial
The episodes were well researched, formatted, and presented. It was an interesting look into the Dark Web, that I would recommend to anyone interested. 4 stars....more
Forensics was a mixed bag for me... It is my first from author Val McDermid. The book covers most things related to the field of forensics; with a sepaForensics was a mixed bag for me... It is my first from author Val McDermid. The book covers most things related to the field of forensics; with a separate chapter devoted to each:
1 The Crime Scene 2 Fire Scene Investigation 3 Entomology 4 Pathology 5 Toxicology 6 Fingerprinting 7 Blood Spatter and DNA 8 Anthropology 9 Facial Reconstruction 10 Digital Forensics 11 Forensic Psychology 12 The Courtroom
Although the subject matter here is very interesting, I found the writing of it to be very dry. Forensics spends a little time going over the science involved, and most of its content telling the reader about historical cases that employed the science. I didn't really enjoy this format, and was more interested in the science side of this story... This book was fairly middle-of-the-road for me, and I'll rate it as such. 3 stars....more
This one was a mixed bag for me... The writing is decent. The book is written in a very easy-to-follow manner. Woodfox's story was also told very wellThis one was a mixed bag for me... The writing is decent. The book is written in a very easy-to-follow manner. Woodfox's story was also told very well. The book covers all the dark details of young Woodfox's life. It mentions his numerous crimes and other extremely anti-social behavior, which ultimately set the course for the rest of his life. Solitary is a very gritty and real story. The book is a good telling of this troubled man's life, and ultimate incarceration resulting from his conviction for the murder of a 23-year-old prison guard named Brent Miller. His conviction in 1974 saw him spend the next ~44 years in solitary confinement; 23 hours a day in small cell, measuring 6-feet wide, 9-feet long, and 12-feet high. Solitary describes the hellish conditions of 1960's era Angola prison; violence (both from the guards and the other inmates), terrible living conditions, endemic rape. This was one hard place to do your bid... You can listen to a ~34 min radio interview that he did with the CBC in 2019 here, if you are interested. The book details his time inside Angola. It also covers his many trials and appeals. Apparently his conviction was based mostly on witness testimony from inmates lacking credibility, who were motivated to testify against him, and lacked any physical evidence. It should also be noted (as an aside) that some members of Miller's family still consider him guilty, and were opposed to his release.
The book also talks about his involvement with The Black Panther Party and the FBI's COINTELPRO anti-Panther actions. Woodfox became a Marxist, a member of The Black Panthers, and staunch anti-capitalist in prison, and the book describes this at length. Solitary goes into great detail about his political beliefs, which I guess comes with the territory and is somewhat understandable, given the context. Unfortunately, the book goes a bit beyond just describing his views. At many times, it is evangelizing. I don't really like it when a book of this nature does this. I would prefer to read the story and be saved the narrative push and rhetoric... The book also seems a bit longer than it needed to be. It could have done well with a more rigorous editing, IMHO. 3.5 stars....more
Wow, this one was intense. It got off to a bit of a slow start, and then really hit its stride in the second half. I had mixed feelings about startingWow, this one was intense. It got off to a bit of a slow start, and then really hit its stride in the second half. I had mixed feelings about starting this one after reading some of the reviews here. I first heard about it from the Joe Rogan podcast.
[image]
Author Tom O'Neill takes a deep dive here; taking the reader through a whirlwind tour of the topics listed in the subtitle. I'm not sure really where to begin with this one... The book begins with a re-telling of the murders at the Tate household, on August 8–9, 1969. O'Neill then examines Manson, his followers, their subsequent trial, and begins to take the reader "down the rabbit hole".
[image]
The book poses a very important question: How did Manson manage to create a cult of loyal followers that would apparently murder on command? As well - what were the motives for the killings?
[image]
Author O'Neill mentions that he and Helter Skelter: The True Story of the Manson Murders author Vincent Bugliosi had become adversaries, as O'Neill's research put him into direct conflict with Bugliosi's account in Helter Skelter.
[image]
The later part of the book takes the reader much farther down the rabbit hole, and the pace really picks up. O'Neill ties many things iconically 60's to the Manson murders: LSD, the CIA, the assassination of both JFK and suspect Lee Harvey Oswald by Jack Ruby. Chaos also dives into the once-classified CIA programs of COINTELPRO and MKULTRA.
[image]
This is one hell of a story, and it made for a very interesting read. The writing here is very good; author O'Neill knows how to tell an engaging story. He spent 20 years (by his account) working on Chaos and the stories it covers. It took so long that the original publisher, Penguin Books, pulled out in 2011. Chaos is a powerhouse of a book that chronicles literal reams of research, notes, interviews, timelines, connections, etc. I was not sure what to expect from this one, and I have to say that I did ultimately end up really enjoying it. I would definitely recommend it to anyone interested. 5 stars....more
This was an excellent book. Author Adam Kucharski takes a deep dive into the topic of contagion; in financial bubbles, disease, and social behavior. "TThis was an excellent book. Author Adam Kucharski takes a deep dive into the topic of contagion; in financial bubbles, disease, and social behavior. "The Rules Of Contagion" starts off with some basic epidemiology; The SIR Model, and S-curves.
[image]
It continues on, telling the reader about financial asset bubbles, pyramid schemes, and "The Greater Fool Theory".
[image]
The book also introduces the reader to the concept of the Basic Reproduction Number (or R Naught, or R0), herd immunity, and The 80/20 Rule. The author spends quite a bit of time talking about social cascades, going "viral", Bayesian reasoning and social media, in general. Some very good writing here. He also talks about crime-related contagion, including broken windows theory, mass shootings, and shootings in general. This was a great book. It was very well-researched, formatted and delivered. I would definitely recommend it to anyone interested in epidemiology, social psychology, or sociology in general. 5 stars....more
This was an entertaining short read. Author Jack Reily rose up the ranks of the DEA, to eventually become its head. "Drug Warrior" tells a bit of his bThis was an entertaining short read. Author Jack Reily rose up the ranks of the DEA, to eventually become its head. "Drug Warrior" tells a bit of his backstory; his childhood, meeting his wife, and a few of the more exciting stories from his early career. He became obsessed (his own words) with capturing the head of the Sinaloa Cartel, Joaquín "El Chapo" Guzmán. This book tells the story of the security dragnet they used to capture him in 2014. It also covers many of his escapes; from both law enforcement, and the now-infamous escape from a maximum-security prison in Mexico via a tunnel up to his shower stall. Chapo also evaded law enforcement before his eventual capture, via another tunnel, this one concealed below a bathtub, and accessed by pushing a button concealed in an electrical outlet that lifted the tub with hydraulics. The secret entrance:
[image]
The tunnel below:
[image]
He was eventually re-caught and is now serving a life sentence in a Supermax prison in Colorado.
[image]
I would recommend this book to anyone interested in the story of Chapo Guzmán, his notorious escapes, and eventaul arrest. 4 stars....more
"Why is there evil? The question has bedeviled humanity for centuries. If there were a single, simple answer, we probably would have had it long ago.."Why is there evil? The question has bedeviled humanity for centuries. If there were a single, simple answer, we probably would have had it long ago..."
Evil was an interesting read, but I felt that the final product was too long, and lacked cohesive formatting. A large chunk of the book could have been edited out, for the sake of brevity and clarity...
Author Roy F. Baumeister is a social psychologist who is known for his work on the self, social rejection, belongingness, sexuality and sex differences, self-control, self-esteem, self-defeating behaviors, motivation, aggression, consciousness, and free will.
Roy Baumeister is one of the leading social psychologists of the modern day. This is my second from the author, after his 2019 book The Power of Bad, which I really enjoyed.
Baumeister writes with an engaging style here, for the most part, and this one should have no trouble holding the reader's attention, despite its long length.
Baumeister lays out the aim of the book early on:
"Many written works have dealt with the question of why evil exists in theological terms; these works tend to emphasize the possible function of evil in the cosmos and the divine reason for permitting it to exist. This book will try to give a causal answer. The mode of explanation will not be theological or moral but scientific—more precisely, I will use the approach of social science. I will not try to defend or justify the existence of evil but merely to explain how it happens to come into the world."
Interestingly enough, Baumeister mentions that those who commit violence against others have a common perception that they are the victims somehow. He cites several interviews with serial killers and other violent criminals, saying that they all felt that they were not actually morally wrong and/or evil in committing their crimes. They all had somehow managed to justify their horrific acts. For example, he cites the case study of a man who kidnapped, raped, and murdered multiple women. When he was interviewed after he was caught, he rationalized his crimes by telling the police that he was actually quite kind to the women while he kidnapped them, that they probably enjoyed the sex they had with him anyhow, and finally; he was actually very compassionate, because he did not make the women suffer long, painful deaths when he finally did kill them...
Baumeister also talks about the myth of "pure evil." That is evil for the sake of evil, with no other end goal. Baumeister says that this type of evil almost never exists. Instead, the perpetrators of the evil all use their evil acts as a justified means to an end, and place their acts within that rubric.
Further to the above point, many of history's most evil figures acted out their evil out of a misguided sense of doing good. Baumeister says:
“It’s always the good men who do the most harm in the world,” Henry Adams said with reference to Robert E. Lee. The point is overstated—it would require quite a stretch to define Saddam Hussein or Idi Amin, let alone Hitler or Stalin, as good men. Yet there is an important kernel of truth in the statement. Good men with lofty principles and admirable intentions have occasionally done a great deal of harm. Many of the greatest crimes, atrocities, and calamities of history were deliberately perpetrated by people who honestly and sincerely wanted to do something good..."
In the book's conclusion, Baumeister drops this quote about "blank slate" theorists and human nature:
"Some years ago, at a professional conference, I had the opportunity to speak to a prominent social psychologist whose work I had long admired, and he told me a story that has been for me a lasting image of the disappointment with theories about socialization and aggression. Like many progressive California academics, he and his wife had resolved to bring up their children surrounded only by healthy, socially desirable values, and this meant that their boys would receive no toy guns. The boys did not complain much about not having such playthings. They simply pretended that the toys they did have were guns. The turning point for the parents came when they found one of their boys chasing the other through the house, holding the remains of his peanut-butterand-jelly sandwich, from which he had taken carefully planned bites to sculpt it into the shape of a pistol. He was pointing the gunshaped remnant of sandwich at his brother and making loud shooting noises. At this point, his parents were more upset by the peanut butter and jelly that was dripping onto their expensive white carpet than about their dwindling faith in the chances of raising androgynous, pacifist sons by surrounding them with educational playthings, and so they gave in and bought the kids some toy guns. Those parents were hardly alone in the disappointment they must have felt when they broke down and bought their sons a shooting toy. Human nature has not generally proved as pliable as the tabula rasa theorists have hoped. Hundreds of experimental utopian communes have broken down amid undone chores and minor bickering or, in some cases, have led to large-scale mass murder."
However, despite the book containing an incredible amount of interesting content, and as mentioned at the start of this review, I felt that the book was too long. The PDF version I have clocked in at a hefty ~550 pages, and the converted audiobook; ~18 hours. A large chunk could have been edited out without any overall loss to the final product, IMHO.
As well; I was just not a fan of the formatting of the book. Baumeister jumps around far too often here, going off on tangents quite frequently. The book lacks flow. The Nazis, Stalin, and Pol Pot's Khmer Rouge are mentioned numerous times in the book, across many different chapters - as are culture, the media, and serial killers. IMHO, the writing should have been reformatted, with a premium placed on narrative continuity...
Some more of what is covered in these pages includes: • Historically evil regimes and their crimes against humanity; Nazi Germany. Stalin's Russia. Cambodia's Khmer Rouge. Mao's Communists and his Cultural Revolution. • Evil in the movies. • Sadism and masochism; torture. • The topic of race in crime; the media's role in stoking racial hatred. • The evil depiction of the enemy in war. Dehumanizing a group of people to facilitate their destruction. • Terrorism. • Organized crime; The Mafia. • Governmental tyranny. • Revenge; ego. • The theory of violent people having low self-esteem; psychopaths. • The social contagion of pathological groupthink. "Us/them" dichotomies. • The role of bystanders in violent acts.
Baumeister ties a knot in the writing(finally) with this quote, that summarizes the research he did for the book. I've covered it with a spoiler, for the sake of this review's clarity: (view spoiler)[ "There are four major root causes of evil, or reasons that people act in ways that others will perceive as evil. Ordinary, well-intentioned people may perform evil acts when under the influence of these factors, singly or in combination. Combinations are harder to defeat. The first root cause of evil is the simple desire for material gain, such as money or power. These ends are not universally regarded as wrong, although occasionally a religious group or other authority has condemned the desire itself. What distinguishes evil in these cases is not the ends, however, but the means. Everyone wants money, but only criminals use violence to get it. Violent or evil means are chosen because the individual does not think that more legitimate means will be successful. Violent and evil means often do furnish short-term, limited success, but in the long run they do not reliably furnish the material benefits they were intended to bring. At best, violence seems to be an effective tool for creating and sustaining power relationships. The second root of evil is threatened egotism. Villains, bullies, criminals, killers, and other evildoers have high self-esteem, contrary to the comfortable fiction that has recently spread through American culture. Violence results when a person’s favorable image of self is questioned or impugned by someone else. Showing disrespect, attacking someone’s honor, insulting or humiliating someone, or in some other way causing a person to lose face will often elicit an aggressive response. The people (or groups or countries) most prone to violence are the ones who are most susceptible to ego threats, especially those who have inflated, exalted opinions of themselves or whose normally high self-esteem does occasionally take a nosedive. Moreover, violence is usually directed toward the source of the ego threat (or occasionally, a meaningful substitute). Such violence may often fall short of providing proof of the disputed self-worth, but it does intimidate, silence, and punish the critic, and it boosts the ego by establishing dominance over the critic. The third root of evil is idealism. When people believe firmly that they are on the side of the good and are working to make the world a better place, they often feel justified in using strong measures against the seemingly evil forces that oppose them. Noble ends are often seen as justifying violent means. In reality, such means often discredit and contaminate the noble goals, but this outcome is rarely anticipated. Human nature inclines people to align themselves in groups that square off against each other, each group seeing itself as good and the other as bad. Group competition can evolve into brutal conflict in which each side sincerely sees itself as the good guys who need to take strong measures to defeat the forces of evil that oppose them. When the perpetrators are driven by idealism, the victims do not get much mercy. The fourth root of evil is the pursuit of sadistic pleasure. This root is responsible for a much smaller proportion of the world’s evil than the others, and indeed most observations of killers, torturers, rapists, and similar evildoers indicate that only about 5 or 6 percent of perpetrators actually get enjoyment out of inflicting harm. Moreover, sadism appears to be an acquired taste. Possibly, it emerges from the body’s natural pattern of compensating for unpleasant emotional reactions with positive feelings, so that people might learn to enjoy torturing or killing in much the same way as they learn to enjoy skydiving despite the innate fear of falling. Still, most people do not seem to learn to enjoy hurting others (possibly because they refuse to let themselves do so, out of guilt or empathy). What looks to victims like sadism, such as when perpetrators laugh among themselves, may be simply insensitivity or camaraderie." (hide spoiler)]
***********************
Evil was a good coverage of the topic. There were quite a lot of interesting thoughts and analyses here by Baumeister throughout. However, the overall presentation should have had a complete reformatting, as well as a more rigorous editing, to improve the final product, IMHO. I would still recommend it to anyone interested. 3.5 stars....more
"Negotiation is the heart of collaboration. It is what makes conflict potentially meaningful and productive for all parties. It can change your life, "Negotiation is the heart of collaboration. It is what makes conflict potentially meaningful and productive for all parties. It can change your life, as it has changed mine..."
Never Split the Difference was an interesting look into the topic.
Author Chris Voss is a 24-year veteran of the FBI and one of the preeminent practitioners and professors of negotiating skills in the world. He is the founder and principal of The Black Swan Group, a consulting firm that provides training and advises Fortune 500 companies through complex negotiations. Voss has taught for many business schools, including the University of Southern California's Marshall School of Business, Georgetown University's McDonough School of Business, Harvard University, MIT's Sloan School of Management, and Northwestern University's Kellogg School of Management, among others.
Voss opens the books with a good intro; setting the pace for the rest of the writing to follow. He's got a great natural engaging style that should have no trouble holding the reader's attention.
The formatting of the book is also very well done. It is broken into well-defined chapters, and each chapter into blurbs of writing with relevant headers at the top. At the end of every chapter, he summarizes the highlights with bullet point notes. I like books that are formatted in this manner, as I feel that it is the optimal way for the reader to retain the information presented.
The writing in the book proper begins with a brief and amusing history of law enforcement "negotiation" with criminals holding hostages. Basically, they used to just storm in and shoot it out, says Voss.
He drops this quote about the aim of the book:
"Negotiation as you’ll learn it here is nothing more than communication with results. Getting what you want out of life is all about getting what you want from—and with— other people. Conflict between two parties is inevitable in all relationships. So it’s useful—crucial, even—to know how to engage in that conflict to get what you want without inflicting damage. In this book, I draw on my more than two-decade career in the Federal Bureau of Investigation to distill the principles and practices I deployed in the field into an exciting new approach designed to help you disarm, redirect, and dismantle your counterpart in virtually any negotiation. And to do so in a relationship-affirming way. Yes, you’ll learn how we negotiated the safe release of countless hostages. But you’ll also learn how to use a deep understanding of human psychology to negotiate a lower car price, a bigger raise, and a child’s bedtime. This book will teach you to reclaim control of the conversations that inform your life and career."
Although most of the writing and content was good here, many of the case studies examined are likely outliers, and not typical examples of negotiations. Voss shares many anecdotal stories from his career to exemplify the processes he uses. Unfortunately, I am not just not sure how often these strategies will work in most real-world applications. Negotiations on the price of something, for example. More often than not, the flexibility on the price of something is mostly determined by how in demand that thing is. If it's a seller's market, the seller likely knows this, and will be reluctant to lower their price. All the verbal judo in the world is not likely to put you in a better position if someone is very firm on their price. I guess there's no harm in trying, in any case. At least then you'll know that you did your best...
To his credit, Voss does examine this dynamic in chapter 10 of the book, where he talks about leverage: what it is, who has it, and how to use it.
***********************
Never Split the Difference was well done. I would recommend it to anyone interested. 4.5 stars....more