Michael's Reviews > Death of a Salesman

Death of a Salesman by Arthur Miller
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
2638828
's review

did not like it
bookshelves: ap-english, classics, drama

I really hate giving this book (well, play) one star. I hate giving any "classic" one star, for that matter. It must have gone down in history for a reason, and is beloved by many. In most classics like this, even if I don't like the story, characters, etc., I usually can find that "spark" that has made it so popular for so many years. But I can honestly say that I found no redeeming qualities in Death of a Salesman. None whatsoever. Sigh.

Maybe I would have been more comfortable actually seeing the play instead of reading it, but, for me, this entire play was tedious and boring. I know I sound like a typical high-school student, but it's true. The storyline fell flat, I didn't care about any of the characters, the whole thing just felt bland. And the whole "these characters have fallen victim to the American Dream" idea was worn out before the first act was over.

And, this is probably my inner feminist talking, but all of the women in this play were useless. We have five women in this play. One is a secretary, and has four lines. The next is Linda, who is pretty much a piece of furniture. She gives in to whatever Willy says (because she has "infinite patience," apparently) and adds close to nothing to the play. Oh, and the other three? They're prostitutes. Classy.
66 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Death of a Salesman.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

August 11, 2010 – Started Reading
August 11, 2010 – Shelved
August 11, 2010 –
page 1
0.71%
August 11, 2010 – Shelved as: ap-english
August 11, 2010 –
page 26
18.57%
August 11, 2010 –
page 51
36.43%
August 11, 2010 –
page 71
50.71%
August 16, 2010 –
page 106
75.71%
August 16, 2010 – Shelved as: classics
August 16, 2010 – Finished Reading
November 30, 2010 – Shelved as: drama

Comments Showing 1-30 of 30 (30 new)

dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Cara (new)

Cara Hahahahahahaha:D Oh yes classy.


Michael Hahaha, glad you got a kick out of it. ;D


message 3: by Carol (new)

Carol Storm Great review! And it's really so much worse than this suggests!


Michael I know! It's a year later, and I still feel bad about giving this one star because it seems to be so popular. Then I remember how terrible it was, though, and don't feel that bad. ;)


Neena i couldn't agree more


Thomas Oh my gosh, this review is like my thoughts on the book expressed articulately. Not the best book to start off my year in AP Lit...


Zohra Haha, I also read this in AP Lit, I agree. End of story (but actually not because I will be posting another one star review...)


Alexandra Kulik Can I ask....
Why do you require redeeming qualities?

This is literature. You're not making friends with these characters--you're exploring them and, through them, a side of humanity.
Frankly I think that you needing them to redeem themselves for the sake of your pleasure is rather naive.


Alexandra Kulik I will add, for the sake of integrity, that Linda is not at all a useless character. She holds the whole family structure together; she keeps Willy alive; she is the single strongest and most wholehearted (i.e. humane) character in the play.


David Sarkies I don't have a problem giving 1 star to a classic (though it is rare), though if I know it is going to get 1 star, I generally don't read it anyway. Sometimes, after reading a 'classic' I want to turn around to the world and ask 'why?'


Linda Orman Yes, typical high school student. Perhaps you should read about modern tragedy and how this book reflects on it directly. Willy Loman was suppose to be unlikeable. His last name even gave evidence of his status. The point behind a modern tragedy is that the hero doesn't redeem himself before he has lost everything. Whereas ancient tragedy is based on royalty, modern was meant to appeal to the everyday person. The problem is that you read it, but didn't actually put thought into it.


Joshua I wonder if four years of seasoning is enough that you now see how embarrassing this review is.


message 13: by Ada (new) - rated it 5 stars

Ada This is an incredible book. The female characters were entirely in keeping with the time and in certainly in a family as traditional as Willy Loman's. Feminism does not even come into it.


message 14: by Ada (new) - rated it 5 stars

Ada This is an incredible book. The female characters were entirely in keeping with the time and in certainly in a family as traditional as Willy Loman's. Feminism does not even come into it.


Raven Roth About the whole feminist thing, the way they acted is considered terrible now, but in the setting of the play, this was normal.


Raven Roth Yes, but, if he were pushing the norms, he might make stronger characters that don't argue throughout the whole book. This was supposed to be an accurate portrait of family dynamics in that setting, and it is


Brittany I had to write a final paper on this (35% of my grade) for my American lit class and it was horrible! I remembered hating this play in high school and though maybe after 13 odd years I'd find it more tolerable...nope. Just as bad as I remembered!


Thoughtdome225 I not only didn't enjoy this, I don't even think it that well written. There are many classics which are great, but this could've been written by a teenager.


Arpit Nayak I think I have to disagree with this comment for two reasons. One, that I did enjoy it and I thought the writing was incredible—the juxtaposition of memory and reality, voices over voices, thoughts flowing into each other. Just the pure technical skill is enough for this to be considered quite rightly a classic, even if one divorces it from it's historical setting. This is more of a subjective reason but I think just a simple rhetorical analysis reveals its merits quite clearly.
The second point about the Female characters is something I think people are just missing out on. I don't think Arthur Miller was much of a feminist but his writing inadvertently is feminist. At least this one. All through the play, it's the toxic masculinity and this constant desire for identification with father figures and manly ideals, metaphors that is ultimately the cause for their self-destructive tendencies. I think any feminist scholar would be glad to chart the Fall of Man through its exploration of masculinity.


message 20: by Kiya (new) - rated it 5 stars

Kiya Arpit wrote: "I think I have to disagree with this comment for two reasons. One, that I did enjoy it and I thought the writing was incredible—the juxtaposition of memory and reality, voices over voices, thoughts..."

Well said! I couldn't agree more!


Jason Blows my mind that so many 1 star reviews on this website hang on the fringe of how the reader feels women were mistreated. Want to face a hard reality check? Women are still, in 2018, considered property in many countries throughout the world. If you really care about that issue than please be my guest and go push your agenda somewhere in the world where it needs pushing.


message 22: by Kevin (new) - added it

Kevin I agree the play was mostly tedious though it serves as an uninteresting reminder as to what emptiness lies in the illusion of the American Dream.

On second note, Alexandra has the correct interpretation of Linda's character.


message 23: by Grayson (new)

Grayson I can see why you felt this way. Linda does seem kind of useless.


Celina A "correct interpretation of Linda's character?" Is there a way to "correctly" interpret creative writing? I'm going to say no. We can get as close as possible to the author's intended characterization, but once the author has put it out there, there's really no "correct" or "incorrect" interpretations - just whether or not that interpretations were the author's intention. Now, I loved Death of a Salesman a great deal. But I can't take away that some people will come away with ideas that are different from mine. If someone felt Linda's character came off as "a piece of furniture," then that's what they got from it. I might disagree, but that's subjectivity, isn't it?


message 25: by Lou (new) - rated it 1 star

Lou Elusiveink        i agree entirely!! the female characters are terrible and whilst i understand the intention behind the book willy himself just falls entirely flat as a character. i studied this book and your point is summarised p well in an essay comparing this play to "fences" (@ all those in the comments saying "you obvs just didnt understand" lmao): willy just pathetic and miller clearly can't comprehend empathising with anyone outside of the scope of his own experiences. i tried reading the crucible (a book i was really excited to start!) and switched off VERY quickly when it became very clear that the play wasn't about women and morality at all but about men and how very smart and very important they are. i mean, how do you make the salem witch trails BORING?? thats his only talent as a writer imo.


Daniel this review is pretty much identical to my now thoughts! tbh, I felt absolutely no pity for Biff or Willy, and Linda was just...she felt like cardboard. And it just didn't sit right with me. because it wasn't just her treatment from the other characters, it was her treatment from the actual author as well.


Abanop Adeep Agree with you man
Great review


Bernardo Indeed, you do sound like a typical high-school student…


message 29: by Smash (new)

Smash Just saw the play. Trust me - it's not any better. Few of the characters are likeable. Above all, the various messages it was trying to convey were often contradictory.


message 30: by Lindsey (new)

Lindsey I felt this way as a high school student, got a degree in Theatre, and I'm about to turn 36- I still feel this way. Excellent review.


back to top