1
s s p 2egal
Advocates, Counsels &@ Consultants
17-B, 3rd Floor, Krishna Niwas, 2 8 1 Shahid Bhagat Singh Road, Fort, Mumbai 400 0 0 1 .
({) : +91 22 4971 7953, + 9 1 86550 5 0 9 1 5
ssplegalmumbai@gmail.com, info@ssplegal.co.in @ www.ssplegal.co.in
Ref. No.: BEFORE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION
CAVEAT NO. OF 2025
IN
TESTAMENTARY PETITION N O . H ( ( OF 2024g
Petition for the Probate of the photocopy of the Last
Will dated 26" February, 2015 of MR. PANNALAL
HARNAMDASNARULA . . . Deceased
Mr. Vijay Pannala Narula ...Petitioner
V/s
Mrs. Renu Ajay Narula & Ors ...Caveators
To,
The Prothonotary and Senior Master,
High Court, Bombay.
!
Sir,
'-%
Be pleased to take on file Caveat a l o n gw i t h Vakalatnama and affidavit in
s u p po r t on behalf of the Caveators in the above matter. The Notice served upon
the Caveators on 02.12.2024. The Caveators also undertake to serve copy of
Caveat upon the Petitioner.
Caveat
2
BEFORE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT
BOMBAY
TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION
CAVEAT NO. OF 2025
IN
TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO'!or 2024
Petition for the Probate of the
photocopy of the Last Will dated 26"
February, 2015 of MR. PANNALAL
HARNAMDAS NARULA
. . . Deceased
Mr. Vijay Pannala Narula ...Petitioner
V/s
Mrs. Renu Ajay Narula & Ors . . . Caveators
INDEX
Sr. Particulars Page No.
No
1 Index
2
2 Proforma
3-6
3 Caveat Application 7-9
4 Vakalatnama 10 - 12
5 Affidavit in support of Petition 13 - 21
6 EXHIBIT "A"
22 - 26
Copy of the Notice dated 1 8 . 1 1. 2 0 2 4
i s s u e dby the Advocate of the Petitioner
7 Docket
27
3
BEFORE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT
BOMBAY
TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION
CAVEAT NO. OF 2025
IN
TESTAMENTARY PETITION No.'or 202 4
Petition for the Probate of the
photocopy of the Last Will dated 26
February, 2015 of MR. PANNALAL
HARNAMDAS NARULA
. . . Deceased
Mr. Vijay Pannala Narula . . . Petitioner
V/s
Mrs. Renu Ajay Narula & Ors . . . Caveators
SSP LEGAL
Advocate for the Caveators
PROFORMA
Office Notes, Office Judge's or Court' s Orders
Memorandum of Coram,
Appearances or Directions
4
Office Notes, Office Judge's or C o u rt ' s Orders
Memorandum of Coram,
Appearances or Directions
5
Office Notes, Office Judge's or Court' s Orders
Memorandum of Coram,
Annearances or Directions
6
Office Notes, Office Judge's or Court' s Orders
Memorandum of Coram,
Annearances or Directions
7
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION
CAVEAT NO. __ OF 2025
IN
TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. HG OF 2024
Petition for the Probate of the photocopy of the
Last Will dated 26 February, 2015 of MR.
PANNALAL HARNAMDAS NARULA, a Hindu,
Indian Inhabitant of Mumbai, Widower,
Occupation: Retired, who was residing at the time
of his death at Flat no. 64, Munish Co-operative
Housing Society Ltd, LBS Marg, Mulund (West),
Mumbai 400 0 8 0
. . . Deceased
MR. VIJA Y PANNALA NARULA ]
aged 73 years, a Hindu, Indian Inhabitant, ]
Occupation Business, Having address at: B- ]
...Petitioner
1202, Park Royale, MMM Malviya Marg, ]
Mulund West, Mumbai 400 080, being the sole ]
Executor named in the Last Will of the ]
Deceased abovenamed
VERSUS
8
1 MRS. RENU AJAY NARULA ]
aged 65 years, a Hindu, Indian Inhabitant, ]
Occupation Self-employed, having ]
address at: Flat no. A-63, 6 floor, ]
Murrish Co-operative Housing Society ]
Ltd, Plot no. 1091-92, LBS Marg, Opp. ]
Johnsons and Johnsons, Agra road, ]
Mulund (W), Mumbai 400 0 8 0 ]
2 MRS. MAHIMA AMIT CHHANGANI ]
(Before marriage: Mahima Ajay Narula) ]
aged 42 years, a Hindu, Indian Inhabitant, ]
Occupation Self-employed, Having ]
address at: Flat no. Q-2005, Shrishti ]
Heights, Mayuresh Srishti Complex, LBS ]
Marg, Bhandup (W), Mumbai 400 078 ]
3 MRS. ADITI PRANA Y KAPOOR l
(Before marriage: Aditi Ajay Narula) l
aged 42 years, a Hindu, Indian Inhabitant, ]
Occupation Self-employed Having l
address at: Madhuban, P lot no. 6 0, Sector l
2 8, Vashi, Navi Mumbai 4 0 0 7 0 3 . l
. . . Caveators
To
The Prothonotary and Senior Master,
High Court, Bombay
S ir,
9
Let nothing be done in the matter of the estate of the abovenamed
Mr. Pannalal Harnamdas Narula, deceased, who died at Flat no. 64,
Munish Co-operative Housing Society Ltd, LBS Marg, Mulund (West),
Mumbai 400 080, without due notice to the above named Caveators.
The address of the Caveators for service of all process, notices, etc. is as
under:
21egal
e for Caveators
The Caveators/ proposed Respondent undertakes to give notice of
filing of this caveat to the Petitioner by Speed Post POD.
Dated this 25lanary, 2025 at Mumbai
Y om·faithfully,
��C,vcatoc
10
I am the member of Advocates Welfare Fund, hence stamp of .20/- is
affixed herewith,
V A K A L A T N A M A
IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT
BOMBAY
TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION
CAVEAT NO. OF 2025
IN
TESTAMENTARY PETITION N O . /A G OF 20246
Petition for the Probate of the photocopy of the
Last Will dated 26 February, 2 0 1 5 of MR.
PANNALAL HARNAMDAS NARULA, a
Hindu, Indian Inhabitant of Mumbai,
Widower, Occupation: Retired, who was
residing at the time of his death at Flat no. 64,
Munish Co-operative Housing Society Ltd,
LBS Marg, Mulund (West), Mumbai 400 0 8 0
. . . Deceased
MR. VIJAY PANNALA NARULA ]
aged 73 years, a Hindu, Indian Inhabitant, ]
Occupation Business, Having address at: B- ]
...Petitioner
1202, Park Royale, MMM Malviya Marg, ]
Mulund West, Mumbai 400 080, being the sole ]
11
Executor named in the Last Will of the ]
Deceased abovenamed
VERSUS
1 MRS. RENU AJAY NARULA ]
aged 65 years, a Hindu, Indian Inhabitant, ]
Occupation Self-employed, having ]
address at: Flat no. A-63, 6 floor, ]
Munish Co-operative Housing Society ]
Ltd, Plot no. 1091-92, LBS Marg, Opp. ]
Johnsons and Johnsons, Agra road, ]
Mulund (W), Mumbai 400 080 ]
2 MRS. MAHIMA AMIT CHHANGANI ]
(Before marriage: Mahima Ajay Narula) ]
aged 42 years, a Hindu, Indian Inhabitant, ]
Occupation Self-employed, Having ]
address at: Flat no. Q-2005, Shrishti ]
Heights, Mayuresh Srishti Complex, LBS ]
Marg, Bhandup (W), Mumbai 400 078 ]
3 MRS. ADITI PRANA Y KAPOOR ]
(Before marriage: Aditi Ajay Narula) ]
aged 42 years, a Hindu, Indian Inhabitant, ]
Occupation Self-employed Having ]
address at: Madhuban, Plot no. 60, Sector l
28, Vashi, Navi Mumbai 400703. l
. . . Caveators
12
To,
The Prothonotary and Senior Master,
High Court, Bombay
Sir,
We, Renu Ajay Narula, Mahima Amit Chhangani and Aditi Pranay
Kapoor, the Caveators /Proposed Respondents abovenamed, do hereby
appoint and authorize SSP Legal, to appear, plead ·and act for us as our
Advocate in the aforesaid matter.
In witness whereof, we have set our hands to this writing.
Dated thi s ')....~day of January, 2025 at Mumbai.
~
Mahima Amit Chhangani
Ad~apoor
ocate for the Petitioner
17-B, 3rd Floor, Krishnan Niwas,
281, Shahid Bhagat Singh Marg,
Fort, Mumbai- 400 001
Email:ssplegalmumbai@gmail.com
Mobile:9821488184
0. S. Reg. No.9112
Advocate Code: 1 -2296
Enrollment No. MAH/LF/268/2022
13
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTAE JURISDICTION
CAVEAT NO. OF 2025
---
IN
TESTAMENTARY PETITON NO. G OF 2024¢
Petition for the Probate of the photocopy of the Last
Will dated 26" February, 2015 of MR.
P ANNALAL HARNAMDAS NARULA, a Hindu,
Indian Inhabitant of Mumbai, Widower,
Occupation: Retired, who was residing at the time
of his death at Flat no. 64, Murrish Co-operative
Housing Society Ltd, LBS Marg, Mulund (West),
Mumbai 400 080
. . . Deceased
MR. VIJA Y PANNALA NARULA l
aged 73 years, a Hindu, Indian Inhabitant, ]
Occupation Business, Having address at: B- ]
1202, Park Royale, MMM Malviya Marg, ]
Mulund West, Mumbai 400 0 8 0 , being the sole ]
Executor named in the Last Will of the Deceased ] .Pe t i t
·.. e11oner
abovenamed
14
VERSUS
1 MRS. RENU AJAY NARULA ]
aged 65 years, a Hindu, Indian Inhabitant, ]
Occupation Self-employed, having ]
address at: Flat no. A-63, 6floor, Munish ]
Co-operative Housing Society Ltd, Plot no. ]
1091-92, LBS Marg, Opp. Johnsons and ]
Johnsons, Agra road, Mulund (W), ]
Mumbai 400 080 ]
2 MRS. MAHIMA AMIT CHHANGANI ]
(Before marriage: Mahima Ajay Narula) ]
aged 42 years, a Hindu, Indian Inhabitant, ]
Occupation Self-employed, Having ]
address at: Flat no. Q-2005, Shrishti ]
Heights, Mayuresh Srishti Complex, LBS ]
Marg, Bhandup (W), Mumbai 400 078 ]
3 MRS. ADITI PRANA Y KAPOOR l
(Before marriage: Aditi Ajay Narula) l
aged 42 years, a Hindu, Indian Inhabitant, l
Occupation Self-employed Having l
address at: Madhuban, Plot no. 60, Sector l
28, Vashi, Navi Mumbai 400703. l
...Caveators
15
AFFIDAVIT OF CA VEATOR IN SUPPORT OF CAVEAT
OPPOSING GRANT OF PROBATE
We, Renu Ajay Narula, Mahima Amit Chhangani and Aditi
Pranay Kapoor, aged adults, Indian Inhabitants, residing at the
address as mentioned aforesaid, the Caveators abovenamed do
hereby state and declare on solemn affirmation as under:
1. We say that Caveator no. l is the Daughter in law of late Mr.
Pannalal Harnamdas Narula(hereinafter referred to as the
"deceased") and Caveator nos. 2 and 3 are the daughters of
Caveator no. J herein and grand daughters of the said
Deceased.
2. We say that we have received the copy of the Testamentary
Petition through the Advocate of the Petitioner vide Notice
dated 1 8 . 1 1. 2 0 2 4 . We say that we have Caveatable interest to
file Caveat in the above Petition. We say that the Advocate for
the Petitioner vide the said Notice has requested the Caveators
to duly provide the notarized copy of the Consent Affidavit on
urgent basis.
16
3. We say that vide Notice dated 1 8 . 1 1. 2 0 2 4 issued by the
Advocate for the Petitioner in the captioned matter, it was
learnt that the Petitioner has filed the present Testamentary
Petition for Probate on the basis of the alleged photocopy o f ·
the Last Will dated 2 6 . 0 2 . 2 0 1 5 of the said deceased. Hereto
annexed and marked as Exhibit "A" is the copy of the Notice
dated 1 8 . 1 1. 2 0 2 4 issued by the Advocate of the Petitioner to
the Caveators herein
4. We deny the execution of the alleged Will dated 2 6 . 0 2 . 2 0 1 5 as
the same is surrounding by various suspicious circumstances.
We are therefore challenging the execution and validity of
the said alleged Will dated 2 6 . 0 2 . 2 0 1 5 executed by the said
deceased and the captioned Petition filed by the Petitioner
herein, on the following grounds:
a. We say that the Dispositions made in the said alleged
Will is executed in a suspicious circumstances which
must be satisfactorily explained before the Petitioner can
get the Probate with the said alleged Will to the
properties and credits left by the deceased.
17
b. We say that the alleged will is drafted in a vague manner
since the alleged Will does not completely describe the
addresses of the immovable properties. We further say
that the alleged Will is not a registered Will but rather
the same is notarized document, which raises further
suspicion regarding the execution of the alleged Will.
c. We further say that the alleged Will was not executed by
the said deceased voluntarily but the same was executed
under the undue influence and pressure exerted by the
Petitioner. We say that the alleged Will had been got
signed from the deceased without his knowledge of its
contents and application of mind by him.
d. We say that at the time of execution of the alleged
Will, due to old age, the said deceased was not in a
disposing state of mind to execute the alleged Will,
using his own judgment and discretion and to make
bequest therein in his full conscious state being aware of
all his acts and consequences, therefore the said
deceased has not executed the alleged Will and bequest
18
contained therein voluntarily and of his own free will,
accord and desire as the said deceased was not in good
mental state and health and was under misguidance,
pressure and influence while executing the alleged Will.
e. We further say that the Advocate for the Petitioner vide
Para 2 of the Notice dated 1 8 . 1 1. 2 0 2 4 issued by the
Advocate for the Petitioner, it was stated that all the
legal heirs are with the possession of the photocopies of
the Original notarized Will, however the same are not
provided by the said Deceased. We state that the
Petitioner is trying to create a false concocted story so
as to mislead this Hon'ble court. We therefore say that
the aforesaid Petition deserves to be dismissed.
f. Without prejudice to the aforesaid contentions, we say
that the Petitioner vide Para 3 of the captioned petition
has stated that "The notarized original of the said
writing, hereinafter referred to as the "WILL" is
lost/misplaced/not traceable at present despite due
diligence". However, the Petitioner neither contended
19
as to what due diligence was undertaken by the
Petitioner nor contended as to how and when the
Original Will was lost or could not be found.
g. We say that the Petitioner vide Para 3 has stated that the
Petitioner has filed a Police complaint in Mulund Police
Station on 0 3 . 0 7 . 2 0 2 4 (before 4 months of filing the
present petition) thereby recording the loss of the
Original notarized will. We state that the Petitioner has
wrongly filed the Police complaint so as to create a false
concocted story to obtain Probate from this Hon'ble
court.
h. We further say that the Petitioner vide Para 5 has alleged
that Late Mrs. Kailash Pannalal Narula was the complete
owner of the Flat no.A-61 (more particularly described
in Schedule-I at Sr.no.]) and thereafter her dying
intestate, the Deceased is only entitled to 25% share in
the said Flat no. A-61. We say that the Petitioner has
not provided and/or annexed any documentary proof so
20
as to establish that Mrs. Kailash Pannalal Narula is the
rightful and legal owner of Plat no. A - 6 1 .
1. We say that the Petitioner vide Para 5 has also alleged
that the Deceased only owns 18.20% shares in Mis.
Fabina Textiles Pvt. Ltd, whereas in the alleged Will it
is stated that the said deceased owns 33% share in the
said public company. We state that the Petitioner has
neither provided and/or annexed any documentary proof
whatsoever so as to validate such statement.
j. We say that the Petitioner vide Para 7 has also alleged
that the value of all the assets after deducting the items
mentioned in Schedule-II is to the tune of Rs.
1,25,22,781/- (Rupees One Crore Twenty Five Lakhs
Twenty Two Thousand Seven Hundred and Eighty One
Only), however the Petitioner has neither annexed any
valuation report nor stated as to how the Petitioner has
obtained such valuation of the properties as mentioned
in the alleged Will.
21
4. In the aforesaid circumstances, We object to the grant of
Probate with alleged photocopy of the Will annexed in the
captioned Petition filed by the Petitioner abovenamed. We
therefore say that the captioned petition deserve to be dismissed
and thus this Hon ' ble Court may be pleased to dismiss the above
Petition with cost.
.~ 0 HANDS
N . TAR'f
\ {!. '".\%1.~.\ MA.HARASHT'RA
EXHIBIT "A"
El ". '
22
VIKAS S . THAKKAR
B.Com.. LLB, M . B . L
Advocate High Court
Date: 18 November, 2024
To,
1. Mrs. R e n u Ajay Narula,
Fl a t N o . A-63, 6 Floor, M u n i s h C H S L ,
Plot N o . 1091-92, L . B. S Marg,
Opposite Johnsons and Johnsons,
Agra Road, M u l u n d (West),
M u m b a i 400 080.
2. Mrs. Mahima Amit Changani,
(Before M a r r i a g e : M a h i m a Ajay N a r u l a )
Flat N o . 2005, Mayuresh Park,
Lake Road, Off. LBS Marg,
Bhandup (West), M u m b a i 400 078.
3. Mrs. Aditi Pranay Kapoor,
(Before Marriage: A d i t i Ajay Narula)
Plot 60, Sector 2 8 , Vashi,
Navi Mumbai - 400 703.
Subject: Testamentary Probate Petition in respect of Last
Will a n d Testament dated 16.02.2015 of
Mr. Pannalal Hamamdas Narula. �
Resi. : 401/402, Sainath Houze, BPS Crc±s Road No. 1, Near Sharon School, Mulend V' ±, Mumbai - 400 060
(M) : 98700 32662/91672 52662 E-mail : advocateiksthzkkar@gmail com
23
VIKAS S . THAKKAR
8
%
B.Com., LLB, M. B. L
Advocate Iiigh Court
Dear Madam,
I am concerned for my Client M r . Vijay Pannalal N a r ul a .
• 0 7 >
Under instructions and on" behalf of my client, I address as
. · · t s . + \
follow: j ; 3 1 g , "
I'
. . (
If ( IAA ✓1�//�A/"'' )) .....11
•F.11..:.,-,f.1�- ...,.
(
I
R
( 9.. ' ' R A j
•j
1. My cl i e n t ' s father i%'Mr' %iii~li l a r n a m d a s Narula, at
I
. i
j
the time of his death, governegby the p r o vi si o n of T h e
l
l
'
H i n d u S u c c e s s i o n Act, 1 9 5 6 ( h e r e i n a ft e r referred to as t h e
" •
"said Act") expired on 8" June, 2021 l e a vi n g b eh i n d my
client, the aforestated N o ti c e e s alongwith Mr. Saurabh
D e e p a k Arora and Ms. Swati Rai, as his only heirs.
2. You are aware t h a t M r . Pannalal Harnamdas Narula during
· I
his lifetime had executed his Last Will and Testament
dated 26 February, 2015 ( h e r e i n a ft e r referred to as the
"said Will"). You are also aware that the original Will (as
notarized) is not traceable, however, all the concerned
heirs are in possession of a photocopy of the original
notarized will, which photocopies were m a d e i m m e d i a t el y
4
after the e x e c u t i o n , a t t e s t a t i o n a n d N o t a r y of t h e s a i d W i l l.
3. You are a l s o a w a r e t h a t if M r . Pannalal Harnamdas Narula
had died intestate, then al l his e s t a t e / p r o p e r ti e s ' ' g
Resi. : 401/42, Sainath House, BPS Cross Road No. 1, Near Sharon School, Mulund West, Mumbai - 400 00.
(M) : 98700 32662 / 9 1 6 7 2 52662 E-mail : advocatevikasthakkar@gmail com
24
V I KA S S . THAKKAR
B.Com., LLB, M.B.L
Advocate Iligh Court
share, NOtICee NOS. T to 3 Would C o l l e c ti v e l y get 7/3
share and Mr. Saurabh Deepak Arora & Ms. Swati Rai
would collectively get 1/3 share in the estate of Mr.
Pannalal Harnamdas Narula ( h e r e n a f t e r referred to as the
"said deceased").
4. However, i n l i g h t of t h e Last W i l l a n d T e s t a m e n t 26?
dated
9,Y;
February, 2015, th e said deceased has provided the
• 0 lo•.,'.J, •·>C \
( , F , ' . + i
d i s t ri b u t i o n of h i s e s t a t e . . ± d s ·zA
' ssrRe
i ( A ! ! "
i Re;ts.4£43 )
it torytt ) <;
i
'
5. It is p e r ti n e n t to note that in the s ai a w.@sk:~{9/
< ~ /
.! deceased has also provided the d i s t r i b u ti o n or u,'
. (
·1
No.61 belonging to late Mrs. Kailash Pannalal Narula
I
(mother of my client) (hereinafter referred to as "said
t
'
Kailash"). You are aware that said Kailash died intestate,
' !
l
on 15 September,2013 leaving behind my cl i e n t , said
j
·1
deceased, Noticee Nos. 2 8 3 and Late. Mrs. Neelima
·1
'
Deepak Arora (mother of M r . Saurabh Deepak Arora and
.
,
'
l Ms. Swati Rai) as her heirs, as per the said Act. Thus, as
'
p e r t h e s a i d Act, it is o n l y t h e h e i r s of t h e s a i d Kailash who
'
r
would be entitled to a share i n Flat No.61. You are aware
t h a t N o t i c e e N o . 1 w o u l d n o t be e n t i t l e d to a n y s h a r e i n F l a t
o. 6 1 . 3
esi, : 401/42, Sainath House, BPS Cr:: Rzd No. 1, Near Sharon Schol, Mtad VWz:, Mnbai - 400
( M ) : 9 8 7 0 0 3 2 6 6 2 / 9 1 6 7 2 52662 • E-mail : a d v o c a t e vi ' . z h ' ' : . C a i l cam
25
VIKAS S . THAKKAR
B.Com., LL B, M . B . L
Advocate Iligh Court
6. However, as p e r the S a i d W i l l th e e n ti r e F l a t 1N o . 6 l comes
to t h e s h a r e of N o t i c e e N o . 1 . If the s a i d W i l l is n o t a c c e p t e d
by y o u i . e . , N o t i c e e N o . 1 , you w i l l be d e p r i v e d of t h e r i g h t s
and benefits in respect of Flat N o . 6 1 . Furthermore, at
present Noticee No.1 is in complete possession of a l l the
fo u r flats and the same has been protected by virtue of
the said Will. But for the said Will, Noticee No.1 cannot
enjoy complete possessory rights in respect of the four
flats c o v e r e d by t h e s a i d W i l l.
7. My cl i e n t states that he is in favour of peaceful and
a m i c a b l e d i s t r i b u t i o n of t h e estate of t h e s a i d d e c e a s e d as
per h i s said W i l l.
8. My c l i e n t states that time has now come for a p p l y i n g for
the probate of t h e said W i l l. You are a w a r e t h a t my c l i e n t
has been appointed a s t h e e x e c u t o r u n d e r t h e s a i d W i l l.
9. My c l i e n t h a s b e e n a d v i s e d to a p p l y for p r o b a t e . o f t h e s a i d
W i ll and a c c o r d i n g l y the estate of t h e said deceased may
be distributed/ applied according to his last will and
testament.�
n School, Maland West, Mumbai. 400 030,
26
VIKAS S . THAKKAR
B.Com., LLB, M.B.L
Advocate High Court
10. I n l i g h t o f t h e aforestated, o n i n s t r u c t i o n s a n d on b e h a l f of
my c l i e n t , p l e a s e fi n d e n cl o s e d herewith a c o p y of t h e
Testamentary Petition to be fi l e d in respect of obtaining
th e probate of t h e last of W i l l and Testament dated 26t
February, 2015 of Late Mr. Pannalal Harnamdas Narula. I
am also e n cl o s i n g the respective consent Affidavit to be
filed by e a c h of t h e N o t i c e e s for o b t a i n i n g the Probate.
1 1. You are hereby requested to provide your consent
Affidavit, d u l y notarized, to be fi l e d a l o n g w i t h the probate
petition, which would in turn facilitate in obtaining the
p r o b a t e at the e a r l i e s t for the overall benefit a n d interest
of a l l c o n c e r n e d .
12. K i n d l y treat t h i s as urgent and expedite.
T h a n k i n g you,
Yours truly,
~R
PY
Vikas S. Thakkar
Advocate High Court
E n cl : As a b o v e .
Resi, : 401/402, Sin»th Hos, BPS Cr Rado. 1, Near Sharon School, Mund W. t, M u k a i - 400 050.
(M) : 98700 32662/91672 52662 • E-mail:advocatevsthalaCgmail cm
27
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE
AT BOMBAY
TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE
JURISDICTION
CAVEAT NO. OF 2025
IN
PETITION NO. 4640F 2025
Petition for the Probate of
the photocopy of the Last
Will dated 26 February, 2015
of MR. PANNALAL
HARNAMDAS NARULA
Deceased
Mr. Vijay Pannala Narula . . . Petitioner
Vis
Mrs. Renu Ajay Narula & Ors ...Caveators
CAVEAT
----------------------
Dated this 2. day of J a n u . , 2025
SSP Legal
Advocates for Caveators
17-B,3 Floor, Krishna Niwas,
281 Shahid Bhagat Marg,
Fort,Mumbai 400 0 0 1.