0% found this document useful (0 votes)
245 views17 pages

Synthesis of RC & RL Networks

The document discusses the synthesis of RC and RL networks, detailing properties of their driving-point impedances, such as the arrangement of poles and zeros on the negative real axis. It includes examples of RC and RL impedances, illustrating the First and Second Foster Canonical Forms and Cauer Forms for network realization. The document emphasizes the importance of residue conditions in determining the nature of the impedance functions.

Uploaded by

kingston8629
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
245 views17 pages

Synthesis of RC & RL Networks

The document discusses the synthesis of RC and RL networks, detailing properties of their driving-point impedances, such as the arrangement of poles and zeros on the negative real axis. It includes examples of RC and RL impedances, illustrating the First and Second Foster Canonical Forms and Cauer Forms for network realization. The document emphasizes the importance of residue conditions in determining the nature of the impedance functions.

Uploaded by

kingston8629
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 17

a) SYNTHESIS OF RC NETWORKS

▪ The properties of RC driving-point impedance are: -

(i) Poles and zeros lie on the negative real axis.

(ii) The poles and zeros alternate on the negative real axis.

(iii)The singularity nearest to (or at) the origin must be a pole whereas the
singularity nearest to (or at)  = − must be a zero. Since there is no pole at
infinity, the degree of numerator can’t exceed that of the denominator.

(iv) The residues of the poles must be real and positive.

▪ Example of RC impedance is

Z(s) =
( s + 1)( s + 4 )( s + 8 )
s ( s + 2 )( s + 6 )

▪ Examples of impedances that are not RC are

( s + 1)( s + 8) ( s + 2 )( s + 4 ) ( s + 1)( s + 2 )
(i) Z(s) = (ii) Z(s) = (iii) Z(s) =
( s + 2 )( s + 4 ) ( s + 1) s ( s + 3)

(i) The First Foster Canonical Form


▪ Given a general RC driving-point impedance

F(s) = H
( s +  )( s +  ) ...
z1 z2
[1]
s ( s +  )( s +  ) ...
p1 p2

This can be expanded as


K0 n Ki
Z(s) = H + + [2]
s i =1 s +  i

with 0   z1   p1   z2   p2  ... [3]

▪ Thus, the poles and zeros of an RC impedance alternate along the negative real
axis. This property is sufficient to characterize the RC impedance function. This
can be implemented in a network as shown in Fig. 3.19.

Page 1 of 17
K1  1 Ki  i
H

1 K0
1 K1 1 Ki

Z (s)

Fig. 3.19 First Foster form RC impedance function

Example 1: Synthesize the following impedance function

Z(s) = 4
( s + 2 )( s + 5)
( s + 1)( s + 4 )
Solution:

Z(s) = 4
( s + 2 )( s + 5) = 4 + K1 + K 2
( s + 1)( s + 4 ) s +1 s + 4

where

4 ( s + 1) ( s + 2 ) ( s + 5) 4 ( −1 + 2 ) (−1 + 5) 16
K1 = ( s + 1) Z ( s) s =−1 = = =
( s + 1) ( s + 4 ) ( −1 + 4 ) s =−1
3
s =−1

4 ( s + 4 ) ( s + 2 ) ( s + 5) 4 ( −4 + 2 ) (−4 + 5) 8
K 2 = ( s + 4 ) Z ( s) s =−4 = = =
( s + 4 ) ( s + 1) ( −4 + 1) s =−1
3
s =−4

Hence,

Z(s) = 4
( s + 2 )( s + 5) = 4 + 16 3 + 8 3
( s + 1)( s + 4 ) s +1 s + 4

With the network realization being

Page 2 of 17
16 3 2 3
4

3 16 F 3 8F

Z (s)

Fig. 3.20

(ii) The second Foster Canonical Form


▪ The second Foster canonical form is obtained by expanding Y ( s ) s , in a partial
fraction and then multiplying the resulting equation by s. The reason is that a
direct partial-fraction expansion of Y ( s ) will yield negative residues. Hence,

K1s Ks
Y(s) = sK + K0 + + ... + i [4]
s + 1 s +i
▪ Implementation of equation [4] results as

1 1
1 K1 Ki
Y ( s) K0 K
K1 Ki
1 i

Fig. 3.20

Example 2: Synthesize the following impedance function in the second Foster


canonical form.

Z(s) = 4
( s + 2 )( s + 5)
( s + 1)( s + 4 )
Solution:
1
For the second canonical form, Y ( s) = , is considered first. Y ( s ) is directly
Z ( s)
expanded by partial fraction expansion as

Page 3 of 17
Y(s) =
( s + 1)( s + 4 ) = 1 + K1 + K 2
4 ( s + 2 )( s + 5 ) 4 s + 2 s + 5

where

( s + 2 ) ( s + 1) (s + 4) ( −2 + 1) (−2 + 4) = − 1
K1 = ( s + 2 ) Y ( s) s =−2 = =
4 ( s + 2 ) ( s + 5) 4 ( −2 + 5) s =−2 6
s =−2

( s + 5) ( s + 1) (s + 4) ( −5 + 1) (−5 + 4) = − 1
K 2 = ( s + 5) Y ( s) s =−5 = =
4 ( s + 5) ( s + 2 ) 4 ( −5 + 2 ) s =−1 3
s =−5

showing that the residues at the poles are negative. The proper function to
expand is Y ( s ) s yielding

Y (s ) (s + 1)(s + 4) kˆ kˆ kˆ
= = 0 + 1 + 2
s 4s(s + 2)(s + 5) s s + 2 s + 5

NB: Since the function has the order of the numerator less than that of the
denominator, then extraction of a constant is not done but direct partial fraction
is done.
Where

Y ( s) ( s ) ( s + 1) (s + 4) ( 0 + 1) (0 + 4) 1
K0 = s = = =
s s =0 4 s ( s + 2 )( s + 5) 4 ( 0 + 2 )( 0 + 5) s =−2 10
s =0

Y ( s) ( s + 2 ) ( s + 1) (s + 4) ( −2 + 1) (−2 + 4) = 1
K1 = ( s + 2 ) = =
s s =−2 4s ( s + 2 ) ( s + 5) 4 ( −2 )( −2 + 5 ) s =−2 12
s =−2

Y ( s) ( s + 5) ( s + 1) (s + 4) ( −5 + 1) (−5 + 4) = 1
K 2 = ( s + 5) = =
s s =−5 4s ( s + 5) ( s + 2 ) 4 ( −5)( −5 + 2 ) s =−1 15
s =−5

Hence,
Y(s)
=
( s + 1)( s + 4 ) = 1 10 + 1 12 + 1 15
or
s 4 s ( s + 2 )( s + 5 ) s s+2 s+5

Multiplying both sides by s gives


1 s s
Y (s ) = + +
10 12s + 24 15s + 75

Page 4 of 17
With the realization being

12  15 

Y (s ) 10 
1 1
F F
24 75

Fig.3.21

(iii) The First Cauer Canonical Form


▪ The process of obtaining this form is similar to the LC case. The continued
fraction expansion of RC impedance Z ( s ) is performed to obtain

1
Z (s) = R1 +
1
C2 s +
1
R3 +
1
C4 s +
...
which is realized by the ladder network;

R1 R3 R5

C1 C4 C6

Fig. 3.22

Example 3: Synthesize the impedance function using first Cauer form

Z(s) =
(
4 s 2 + 7 s + 10 )
s + 5s + 4
2

Solution:
The continued fraction expansion is as shown in the next page

Page 5 of 17
s 2 + 5s + 4 4 s 2 + 28s + 40 ( 4
4s 2 + 20s + 16
8s + 24 s 2 + 5s + 4 ( s 8
s 2 + 3s
2s+4 8s + 24 ( 4
8 s + 16
8 2s+4( s 4
2s
4 8(2
8
The ladder network implementation is

4 4 2
1 1
F F
8 4

Fig. 3.24

(iv) The Second Cauer Canonical Form


▪ This is obtained by rearranging Z ( s ) such that the numerator and denominator
polynomials appear in ascending order of s and then a continued-fraction
expansion is performed with the general form being: -

1 1
Z (s) = +
C1s 1 1
+
R2 1 1
+
C3 s 1 + 1
R4 ...
▪ This yields the ladder network;

Page 6 of 17
C1 C3 C5

R2 R4 R6

Fig. 3.23

Example 4: Synthesize the impedance function using second Cauer form


3 ( s + 2 )( s + 4 )
Z(s) =
s ( s + 3)

Solution: Expanding and rearranging the ascending powers of s as


24 + 18s + 3s 2
Z(s) =
3s + s 2
▪ The continued fraction expansion is shown in the next page.
▪ Hence the circuit becomes

1 1
F F
8 10 100
Z (s)  30
3

Fig. 3.25

3s + s 2 24 + 18s + 3s 2 ( 8 s → Z
24 + 8s
10s + 3s 2 3s + s 2 ( 3 10 → Y
3s + 9 10 s 2
1 2
s 10s + 3s 2 (100 s → Z
10
10s
1 2
3s 2 s (1 30 → Y
10
1 2
s
10

Page 7 of 17
Exercise: Synthesize the impedance function using second Cauer form

Z(s) =
(
4 s 2 + 7 s + 10 )
s + 5s + 4
2

SYNTHESIS OF R-L NETWORKS

▪ The properties of RL functions are:

(i) The poles and zeros of the RL driving point impedance function are located
on the negative real axis of the s-plane.

(ii) Poles and zeros alternate along the negative real axis.

(iii)The singularity at or near the origin, or s = 0 is a zero.

(iv) The singularity at near s = − is a pole.

(v) The residues at the poles of Z(s) are real and negative. The residues of Z(s)/s
are real and positive.

Example: Test whether the following function is RL.

5 ( s + 1)( s + 4 )
Z (s ) =
(s + 3)( s + 5)

(i) The poles are −3 and −5 while the zeros are −1 and −4 . Hence, the poles and
zeros are located on the negative real axis.

(ii) The poles are zeros alternate on the negative real axis.

(iii)The singularity near origin is s = −1, which is a zero and hence condition
number 3 is satisfied.

(iv) The singularity near s = − is s = −5 , which is a pole and hence condition


number 4 is satisfied.

(v) The residues of Z ( s ) are

Page 8 of 17
5 ( s + 1)( s + 4 ) k k
Z (s ) = = 1 + 2
(s + 3)(s + 5) s + 3 s + 5

Where

5 ( s + 1)( s + 4 ) ( s + 3)
k1 = Z ( s ) = = −5
( s + 3) ( s + 5 ) s =−3

5 ( s + 1)( s + 4 ) ( s + 5)
k2 = = −10
( s + 3) ( s + 5 ) s=−5

Expanding Z ( s ) s we get

Z ( s ) 5 ( s + 1)( s + 4 ) k 0 k1 k
= = + 2
s s ( s + 3)( s + 5 ) s s + 3 s + 5

Where

5 ( s + 1)( s + 4 ) s 4
k0 = =
s ( s + 3)( s + 5 ) s =0
3

5 ( s + 1)( s + 4 ) (s + 3) 10
k1 = =
s ( s + 3) ( s + 5 ) 3
s =−3

5 ( s + 1)( s + 4 ) ( s + 5)
k2 = =2
s ( s + 3) ( s + 5 )
s=−5

Since the residues for Z ( s ) are negative and the residues for Z ( s ) s are positive,

the condition number 5 is satisfied. Consequently, the given function is RL.

Implementation of RL network Functions


a) Foster Form
(i) The Foster Form I

Page 9 of 17
▪ The first Foster form is obtained by partial fraction expansion of YRL ( s ) .

▪ If an RL admittance function is to be synthesize, then its partial fraction


is of the form.

K0 Ks Ks
Y(s) = K + + 1 + ... + i + ... [4]
s s + 1 s +i
▪ The network implementation is

1 i
 
1 K1 Ki
1
Y ( s) H 
K0 K 1 1
H H
K1 Ki

Fig. 3.28

Example 1: Synthesize the following RL admittance function


3 ( s + 2 )( s + 4 )
Y(s) =
s ( s + 3)

Solution:
3 ( s + 2 )( s + 4 ) K0 K
Y(s) = = 3+ + 1
s ( s + 3) s s+3

where

3 ( s ) ( s + 2 ) ( s + 4) 3 ( 0 + 2 ) (0 + 4)
K 0 = ( s ) Y ( s ) s =0 = = =8
( s ) ( s + 3) ( 0 + 3) s =0
s =0

3 ( s + 3) ( s + 2 ) ( s + 4) 3 ( −3 + 2 ) (−3 + 4)
K0 = ( s + 3) Y ( s) s =−3 = = =1
s ( s + 3) ( −3) s =−3
s =−3

▪ Hence,

8 1
Y(s) = 3 + +
s s+3

Page 10 of 17
▪ The implementation is as shown in Fig. 3.29.

3
1 1
Y ( s) H 
8 3
1H

Fig. 3.29

(ii) The Foster Form II


▪ In the second Foster form, we expand Z ( s ) as

K1s Ks
Z(s) = K s + K 0 + + ... + i + ... [1]
s + 1 s +i
The partial fraction expansion of RL impedance would yield terms as
K1
− [2]
s + 1

▪ To overcome this problem, Z ( s ) s is expanded to obtain the Foster form of Z ( s )


as

K0 Ks Ks
Z(s) = + K + 1 + .. + i ... [3]
s s + 1 s +i
▪ The general network becomes

K0 K1 Ki 
K H

K1  1 H Ki  i H

Z (s)

Fig. 3.26 First Foster form of RL impedance function

Example 2: Synthesize the following RL impedance function

Page 11 of 17
2 ( s + 1)( s + 3)
Z(s) =
( s + 2 )( s + 6 )
Solution:
2 ( s + 1)( s + 3) K1 K
Z(s) = = 2+ + 2
( s + 2 )( s + 6 ) s+2 s+6

Where

2 ( s + 2 ) ( s + 1) ( s + 3) 2 ( −2 + 1) (−2 + 3) 1
K1 = ( s + 2 ) Z ( s) s =−2 = = =−
( s + 2) ( s + 6) ( −2 + 6 ) s =−2
2
s =−2

2 ( s + 6 ) ( s + 1) ( s + 3) 2 ( −6 + 1) (−6 + 3) 15
K 2 = ( s + 6 ) Z ( s) s =−6 = = =−
( s + 6) ( s + 2) ( −6 + 2 ) s =−6
2
s =−6

Which shows that the residues are negative, but the partial fraction expansion
of Z ( s ) s is

Z(s) 2 ( s + 1)( s + 3) K 0 K K
= = + 1 + 2
s s ( s + 2 )( s + 6 ) s s+2 s+6

Where

2 ( s ) ( s + 1) ( s + 3) 2 ( 0 + 1) (0 + 3) 1
K 0 = ( s ) Z ( s ) s =0 = = =
( s ) ( s + 2 )( s + 6 ) s =0 ( 0 + 2 )( 0 + 6 ) s =0
2

2 ( s + 2 ) ( s + 1) ( s + 3) 2 ( −2 + 1) (−2 + 3) 1
K1 = ( s + 2 ) Z ( s) s =−2 = = =
s ( s + 2) ( s + 6) ( −2 )( −2 + 6 ) s =−2
4
s =−2

2 ( s + 6 ) ( s + 1) ( s + 3) 2 ( −6 + 1) (−6 + 3) 5
K 2 = ( s + 6 ) Z ( s) s =−6 = = =
s ( s + 6) ( s + 2) ( −6 )( −6 + 2 ) s =−6
4
s =−6

Z(s) 1 2 1 4 54
= + + or
s s s+2 s+6
1 1 4s 5 4s
Z(s) = + +
2 s+2 s+6
The synthesized network is

Page 12 of 17
1 4 5 4
1

2 1 8H 5 24 H

Z (s)

Fig. 3.27

Exercise:
Synthesize the following RL impedance function in the two Foster forms

Z(s) =
( s + 1)( s + 5)
( s + 3)( s + 7 )
b) Cauer Form
(i) The Cauer Form I
▪ The continued fraction expansion of RL impedance, Z ( s ) is performed to
obtain

1
Z (s) = L1s +
1 1
+
R2 L s + 1
3
1 1
+
R4 ...
which is realized by the ladder network;

L1 L3 L5

Z (s ) R2 R4 R6

Fig. 3.30 b )

Example 3: Synthesize the following function using first Cauer form.

s ( s + 4 )( s + 6 )
Z(s) =
( s + 2 )( s + 5 )

Page 13 of 17
Solution:

1 s ( s + 4 )( s + 6 ) s 3 + 10 s 2 + 24 s
Z(s) = = = 2
Z(s) ( s + 2 )( s + 5 ) s + 7 s + 10

s 2 + 7 s + 10 s 3 + 10s 2 + 24s ( s
s 3 + 7 s 2 + 10s
3s 2 + 14s s 2 + 7 s + 10 (1 3
s 2 + (14 3 ) s

( 7 3) s + 10 3s 2 + 14 s ( (9 7 ) s
3s 2 + ( 90 7 ) s

(8 7 ) s ( 7 3) s + 10(49 24
( 7 3) s
10 (8 7 ) s (( 4 35 ) s
(8 7 ) s

Hence,

1
Z (s) = s +
1 1
+
3 9s+ 1
7 49 1
+
24 4 s
35
The synthesized network is

1H 9 4
H H
7 35
24
Z (s ) 3 
49

Page 14 of 17
(ii) The Cauer Form II
▪ This is obtained by rearranging Z ( s ) such that the numerator and
denominator polynomials appear in ascending order of s and then a
continued-fraction expansion is performed with the general form being: -

1
Z (s) = R1 +
1 1
+
L2 s R + 1
3
1 1
+
L4 s ...

R1 R3 R5

L2 L4 L6

Example 4: Synthesize the following RL impedance function in the using the


second Cauer form:
6 + 8s + 2 s 2
Z(s) =
12 + 8s + s 2
Its continued fraction expansion becomes

12 + 8s + s 2 6 + 8s + 2s 2 (1 2
6 + 4s + 1 2 s 2

4s + 3 2 s 2 12 + 8s + s 2 ( 3 s
12+ 9 2s

7 2s+s 2 4s + 3 2 s 2 (8 7
4s + 8 7 s 2

5 14 s 2 7 2s+s 2 (49 5s
7 2s

s 2 5 14 s 2 (5 14
5 14 s 2

Page 15 of 17
Hence, the synthesized network is

1 8 5
  
2 1 7 5 14
H H
3 49

Fig. 3.30

Exercise
Exercise
1. With suitable reasoning justify whether the given impedance functions are LC,
RC or RL.

s3 + 2 s
a) Z(s) = [LC]
s 4 + 4s 2 + 3

s 2 + 6s + 8
b) Z(s) = [RC]
s 2 + 4s + 3

s 2 + 4s + 3
c) Z(s) = 2 [RL]
s + 6s + 8

s 2 + 5s + 6
d) Z(s) = [It’s none of the three types of functions]
s2 + s
s 4 + 5s 2 + 6
e) Z(s) =
s3 + s

2. Synthesize the following function in all the four formats

Z(s) =
(
s s2 + 2 )
(s 2
)(
+1 s + 3 2
)
3. The following pole zero configuration has three diagrams. Pick up the one which
represents RL impedance function and synthesize in all the four formats.

Page 16 of 17
j

− −4
 
−3 −2 −1
(a)

j

− −4
 
−3 −2 −1
(b)

j


− −4
 
−3 −2 −1
(c)
Fig. 3.32

Page 17 of 17

You might also like