Skip to content

Repository files navigation

CliCFor

CliCFor — Unravelling seasonal to decadal CLImate influence on the Carbon cycle in FORest

CliCFor investigates how climate variability, extremes, and long‑term trends affect forest carbon cycling across contrasting environments. This repository hosts materials related to the PRIN 2022 project 2022ETAB7T (24 months), combining eddy covariance fluxes, tree‑ring quantitative wood anatomy, stable isotopes, and process‑based modelling to understand when flux‑based and biomass‑based signals converge or diverge.


Table of contents


Status

🚧 Active cleanup / progressive update.
This repository is being reorganized to improve documentation, data provenance, and reproducible analysis workflows.

  • Documentation and initial processed datasets are available.
  • Analysis scripts and reusable functions are being added incrementally.
  • Some raw datasets (e.g., full eddy covariance exports) may not be redistributed here (see Data policy).

Project rationale

Forest carbon sinks are central to climate-change mitigation, but the relationship between ecosystem carbon uptake and woody biomass accumulation is still only partially understood. CliCFor was designed to investigate the causal relationships between climate, primary productivity, and wood biomass, and to explain why flux-based and biomass-based estimates of forest carbon sequestration may diverge.

The project combines approaches that are often used separately:

  • long eddy covariance time series
  • tree-ring anatomy and biomass proxies
  • stable carbon isotope analyses
  • statistical and process-based modeling

Approach

High‑level components:

  • Eddy covariance flux processing and analysis (quality control, partitioning, gap filling; daily to multi‑decadal variability)
  • Tree‑ring analyses including quantitative wood anatomy to reconstruct wood formation/biomass proxies at finer temporal resolution than ring width alone
  • Stable carbon isotopes (e.g., δ¹³C in earlywood vs latewood) to support physiological interpretations (e.g., intrinsic water‑use efficiency)
  • Integrated modelling to test causal hypotheses and improve process understanding

Study sites

Proposal vs actual site selection

The original PRIN proposal described three pure conifer stands under contrasting climates (OBS in Canada, Renon in Italy, Yatir in Israel). During the project, site selection was reassessed based on data availability, harmonization, and analysis scope. The table below reports the study sites actually considered in the current repository content.

Study sites table (click to expand)
Acronym Site Name Country Lat (°N) Lon (°) Elev. (m a.s.l.) Tree species MAT (°C) MAP (mm) EC time-span GPP (g C m⁻² yr⁻¹) QWA time-span
OJP Old Jack Pine Canada 53.916 -104.692 524 P. banksiana 0.5 495 1999–2021 606 1921–2021
OBS Old Black Spruce Canada 53.987 -105.118 629 P. mariana 0.6 451 1999–2021 806 1909–2021
TP Turkey Point Canada 42.710 -80.357 184 P. strobus 8.0 997 2003–2018 1434 1957–2019
REN Renon Italy 46.587 11.434 1735 P. abies 6.0 964 1999–2020 1350 1929–2020
SR San Rossore Italy 43.731 10.910 5 P. pinea 15.3 900 2013–2024 2651 1943–2022
TOR Torgnon Italy 45.823 7.561 2050 L. decidua 2.9 1100 2012–2020 1322 1935–2021

Table notes.

  • MAT = Mean Annual Temperature; MAP = Mean Annual Precipitation.
  • EC time-span = period with eddy covariance measurements available; GPP = mean annual Gross Primary Production; QWA time-span = time span covered by xylem anatomical series.
  • Longitude is reported in degrees with East positive (negative values indicate West).

Global map of CliCFor study sites


Research units and roles

  • UNIPD — University of Padova (PI unit)
    • Principal Investigator: Daniele Castagneri (ORCID)
    • Main role: tree‑ring analysis, quantitative wood anatomy, project coordination
  • UNINA — University of Naples Federico II
    • Unit lead: Angelo Rita (ORCID)
    • Main role: integrated data analysis, statistical modelling, process‑based modelling
  • UNIBZ — Free University of Bozen‑Bolzano
    • Unit lead: Massimo Tagliavini (ORCID) / Leonardo Montagnani (ORCID)
    • Main role: eddy covariance flux analysis and site‑level flux data coordination

Project participants

In addition to the unit leaders, the project involves the following participants and collaborators:

  • UNIBZ — Free University of Bozen‑Bolzano, Bolzano, Italy: Enrico Tomelleri
  • CNR-ISAFOM — Forest Modelling Lab., Institute for Agriculture and Forestry Systems in the Mediterranean, National Research Council of Italy, Perugia, Italy: Alessio Collalti; Paulina F. Puchi; Daniela Dalmonech
  • UNINA — Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Portici, Italy: Antonio Saracino; Enrica Pinelli; Greta Liuzzi
  • UNIPD — Department of Land, Environment, Agriculture and Forestry (TESAF), University of Padua, Legnaro, Italy: Giancarlo Genovese

Work packages

  • WP1 — C fluxes: acquisition, validation, and analysis of long‑term eddy covariance and climate time series
  • WP2 — Tree rings: sampling, quantitative wood anatomy, stable carbon isotopes, and climate‑growth relationships
  • WP3 — Modelling: integration of flux, climate, and tree‑ring information; hypothesis testing; refinement of 3D-CMCC-FEM
  • WP4 — Dissemination & communication: publications, outreach, metadata, and open science outputs
  • WP5 — Project & data management: coordination, reproducibility, and data organization

Model used in the project

CliCFor used the process‑based forest model 3D-CMCC-FEM within the modelling component of the project.


Data policy and availability

What is stored in this repository

  • Project documentation (docs/)
  • Processed/derived products prepared for analysis (see data/processed/)
  • Dataset metadata and notes (see data/metadata/)
  • Scripts and reusable code (as they become available; scripts/ and src/)

What is not necessarily stored here

  • Full raw eddy covariance exports, large model outputs, and/or third‑party data that cannot be redistributed.
  • Credentials, private keys, or any sensitive material.

When data are not redistributed, this repository aims to provide:

  • clear provenance and access notes in data/metadata/
  • scripts that can rebuild derived products when access is granted

Repository structure

CliCFor/
|- docs/                              project notes and documentation
|- data/
|  |- raw/                            original data files kept unchanged (if redistributed)
|  |- processed/                      derived datasets ready for analysis
|  |  `- xylem_anatomy_chronologies/  chronology files currently versioned here
|  `- metadata/                       codebooks, notes, dataset descriptions
|- scripts/                           analysis scripts and workflow steps
|- src/                               reusable R functions
|- outputs/
|  |- figures/                        generated plots
|  `- tables/                         generated tables
|- CliCFor.Rproj
`- README.md

How to cite

If you use this repository, please cite it using the metadata provided in CITATION.cff.

For software, documentation, or data products reused separately, also cite the specific component and any related publication when available.


License

  • Code: MIT (see LICENSE)
  • Documentation: CC BY 4.0 (see LICENSE-DOCS.md)
  • Data products: CC BY 4.0 unless otherwise stated (see LICENSE-DATA.md and data/metadata/)

Acknowledgment

This project was supported by the National Recovery and Resilience Plan (PNRR), Mission 4, Component 2, Investment 1.1, Call for tender No. 104 published on 2.2.2022 by the Italian Ministry of University and Research (MUR), funded by the European Union - NextGenerationEU - Project Title "CliCFor" - CUP C53D23005270001 - Grant Assignment Decree No. 2022ETAB7T adopted on 14/07/2023 by the Italian Ministry of University and Research (MUR).


Contact

For repository issues, documentation corrections, or suggestions, please use the GitHub issue tracker. For scientific aspects of the project, refer to the unit leaders listed above.


Contributing

Contributions that improve documentation, metadata quality, and reproducibility are welcome.

Before proposing major structural changes, please open an issue so that repository organization and data-policy constraints can be discussed first.

About

Unravelling seasonal to decadal CLImate influence on Carbon cycle in FORest. A multidisciplinary analysis across contrasting climates

Resources

Stars

1 star

Watchers

1 watching

Forks

Releases

Packages

Contributors

Languages