Skip to content

Conversation

@e06084
Copy link
Collaborator

@e06084 e06084 commented Dec 12, 2025

summary增加score统计信息:

image

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @e06084, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request introduces a significant enhancement to the evaluation framework by enabling the collection and summarization of detailed metric scores, particularly beneficial for RAG (Retrieval Augmented Generation) evaluations. This feature provides a more granular understanding of performance across different metrics, offering insights into average, min, max, and standard deviation. The accompanying documentation has been thoroughly revised to reflect these changes and provide clearer guidance, while older, less relevant examples have been removed to streamline the project.

Highlights

  • Metric Score Collection: Introduced functionality to collect and store individual metric scores (e.g., for RAG evaluation scenarios) within the SummaryModel during the execution process.
  • Comprehensive Score Statistics: Added methods to SummaryModel for calculating detailed statistics for collected metric scores, including average, minimum, maximum, and standard deviation. It also provides overall and per-metric average scores.
  • Enhanced RAG Evaluation Documentation: Significantly updated the Chinese documentation for RAG evaluation metrics, clarifying field requirements, calculation methods, scoring standards, configuration options, and best practices for combining metrics.
  • Codebase Streamlining: Removed several outdated RAG evaluation example scripts, simplifying the examples/rag directory and improving code maintainability.
  • Robust Testing: Added new unit tests for LocalExecutor and a dedicated test file for SummaryModel to ensure the correct collection, calculation, and reporting of metric scores in various scenarios.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces a significant feature for summarizing metric scores, particularly for RAG evaluation scenarios. The changes include adding new data models and methods for score calculation, updating the execution logic to collect scores, and extensively improving the documentation for RAG metrics. The implementation is solid and includes a comprehensive set of new unit tests. I've identified a critical issue with potential double-counting of scores, along with a few medium-severity suggestions to improve efficiency, numerical precision, and fix broken links in the documentation. Overall, this is a great contribution.

@shijinpjlab
Copy link
Collaborator

spark没有支持

@e06084
Copy link
Collaborator Author

e06084 commented Dec 15, 2025

spark没有支持

done

@shijinpjlab shijinpjlab merged commit 9904d84 into MigoXLab:dev Dec 15, 2025
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants