Draft
Conversation
8dabc7e to
813d1b6
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Probably, I will close this draft. The code is now in another PR.
Previously, the 'mcmini back' command in GDB mode was never really working.
This commit attempts to fix it.
@maxwellpirtle ,
There is a bug in mcmini_private.cpp, when I do
mc_prepare_to_model_check_new_program(). I'm sure it's easy for you to fix this bug, or tell me how to do it.I'm simply trying to re-initialize McMini to begin its search again at
traceId==0. But as you can see from my suggested test, below, when I callmcmini back, instead of reducing the number of transitions for this trace from 9 to 8, instead, it grows the number of transitions. So, clearly I did not re-initialize McMini properly to again start attraceId==0. (For motivation, I'm trying to add support formcmini backwhen interactively debugging a traceSeq, such as:To test it, use your favorite target multithreaded application,
a.out, and do: