Repository navigation
feat(graphql): add type-name-option-for-custom-type-naming - #3678
Merged
kamilmysliwiec merged 1 commit intoOct 1, 2025
Merged
Conversation
1 task done
mag123c
force-pushed
the
feat/custom-type-name-definitions
branch
from
August 15, 2025 14:21
350e11d to
9e151cd
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
PR Checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
PR Type
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
What is the current behavior?
Currently, when generating TypeScript definitions from GraphQL schema files, all type names are used as-is. This can lead to naming conflicts when you have similar type names across different domains (e.g., User database entity, User GraphQL type, UserDTO).
Issue Number: #3440
What is the new behavior?
Added a typeName option to DefinitionsGeneratorOptions that allows users to transform generated type names using a custom function.
Example usage:
This will transform:
Root types (Query, Mutation, Subscription) remain unchanged as IQuery, IMutation, ISubscription.
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Other information
This is my first contribution to the NestJS GraphQL project. I've carefully studied the codebase and followed the existing patterns to implement this feature. Open to any feedback for improvements.