lint W59/E60: don't check vcs upstream - #4635

What's actually checked with an rsync URL?

From dev meeting: the test needs to be http or rsync pointing to a file (rather than a directory)

This could potentially have a test for whether a checksum has been added when there shouldn't be one

I think the details about rsync can be figured out later, it's less critical.

The rsync file/directory part should be figured out now (we shouldn’t close one bug by creating another), but I agree the extra checksum check can wait. Regardless, please can issues be opened to track anything which isn’t fixed now 🙂

Just finished both, no need of new issue :)
In fact the good check is too look is it is an archive url, regardless of the backend

reviewed mechanism and add E67 for url present and no archive url ping @kit-ty-kate

I've tested a number of cases with it and it seems good to go for me.