fix(doctor): stop promising --fix for working isolated shell-prompt cron jobs (#94655) - #94784
Conversation
|
Codex review: needs maintainer review before merge. Reviewed June 21, 2026, 5:38 PM ET / 21:38 UTC. Summary PR surface: Source +66, Tests +156, Other +6. Total +228 across 8 files. Reproducibility: yes. at source level. Current main and v2026.6.9 route unresolved shell/process cron prompt jobs into the legacy issue preview and then append the shared Review metrics: 2 noteworthy metrics.
Stored data model Root-cause cluster Members:
Proposal only: this assessment does not dispatch repair, suppress jobs, mutate sibling items, close, or merge anything. Merge readiness Overall follows the weaker of proof and patch quality, so missing proof can cap an otherwise strong patch. Risk before merge
Maintainer options:
Next step before merge
Security Review detailsBest possible solution: Land this credited replacement after maintainer wording approval or tightening, then close #94655 and supersede overlapping duplicate PRs. Do we have a high-confidence way to reproduce the issue? Yes, at source level. Current main and v2026.6.9 route unresolved shell/process cron prompt jobs into the legacy issue preview and then append the shared Is this the best way to solve the issue? Yes, with maintainer wording approval. Splitting manual-only cron advisories from AGENTS.md: found and applied where relevant. Codex review notes: model internal, reasoning high; reviewed against 108d6d7eca00. Label changesLabel justifications:
Evidence reviewedPR surface: Source +66, Tests +156, Other +6. Total +228 across 8 files. View PR surface stats
What I checked:
Likely related people:
What the crustacean ranks mean
Shiny media proof means a screenshot, video, or linked artifact directly shows the changed behavior. Runtime, network, CSP, and security claims still need visible diagnostics. How this review workflow works
|
|
🦞✅ Approver: What merged:
Automerge notes:
The automerge loop is complete. Automerge progress:
|
c4e80ce to
a844977
Compare
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
a844977 to
4687f0d
Compare
fbad6d2 to
1bfa2b2
Compare
7454a37 to
d3e526d
Compare
d3e526d to
c6f4435
Compare
d94e3a6 to
f427d02
Compare
|
@clawsweeper review |
|
🦞🧹 I asked ClawSweeper to review this item again. |
|
🦞✅ Source: Why human review is needed: What the maintainer can do as a next step: I added |
|
@clawsweeper review |
…ron jobs (#94655) Co-authored-by: ZengWen-DT <290981215+ZengWen-DT@users.noreply.github.com>
|
@clawsweeper review |
|
🦞🧹 I asked ClawSweeper to review this item again. |
|
@clawsweeper approve |
Makes #94659 merge-ready for the ClawSweeper automerge loop.
The edit pass should inspect the live PR diff, review comments, and failing checks; rebase if needed; keep the contributor branch credited; and stop only when validation is green or an external blocker is proven.
Source
Replacement for #94659 because the source branch could not be updated.
Original contributor: @ZengWen-DT.