Skip to content

Kimai: ExportTemplate CRUD Missing Authorization Check Allows Unauthorized TEAMLEAD Access

Moderate severity GitHub Reviewed Published Jun 11, 2026 in kimai/kimai • Updated Jul 14, 2026

Package

composer kimai/kimai (Composer)

Affected versions

<= 2.57.0

Patched versions

2.58.0

Description

Summary

The ExportController web routes for creating and editing export templates are gated only by the class-level create_export permission, which is granted to ROLE_TEAMLEAD by default. The corresponding API routes and UI button visibility correctly require the stricter create_export_template permission, which is granted only to ROLE_ADMIN and ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN. A TEAMLEAD user can directly access the template create/edit routes to create or modify global export templates that are visible to all users including administrators.

Details

The ExportController applies the class-level annotation #[IsGranted('create_export')].

The createExportTemplate (line 210) and editExportTemplate (line 220) methods have no method-level #[IsGranted('create_export_template')] annotation. The permission hierarchy in config/packages/kimai.yaml:103,115,122-123 grants create_export to ROLE_TEAMLEAD via the EXPORT permission set, but create_export_template only to ROLE_ADMIN and ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN.

The API controller correctly requires create_export_template. The UI template (templates/export/index.html.twig:124) correctly hides the create button behind create_export_template. Only the web controller routes are missing the check.

ExportTemplate entities are global — they have no per-user or per-team scoping (src/Entity/ExportTemplate.php:19-56). Any template created or modified by a TEAMLEAD which is marked as "Available for all users" is visible to and usable by every user in the instance.

A PoC was provided, but removed for security reasons.

Impact

Any user with ROLE_TEAMLEAD can create and modify global export templates intended to be managed only by administrators. The templates control the structure and content of exported data (columns, renderer, format). While the impact is limited to data integrity manipulation of a non-security-critical resource (no RCE, no credential exposure), it violates the intended permission boundary and allows a lower-privileged user to influence the data output format used by all users including administrators.

Solution

The permission check #[IsGranted('create_export_template')] was added to the ExportController covering the methods createExportTemplate() and editExportTemplate.

See https://www.kimai.org/en/security/ghsa-rw46-qg69-vg6h for more details.

References

@kevinpapst kevinpapst published to kimai/kimai Jun 11, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Jul 14, 2026
Reviewed Jul 14, 2026
Last updated Jul 14, 2026

Severity

Moderate

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v4 base metrics

Exploitability Metrics
Attack Vector Network
Attack Complexity Low
Attack Requirements None
Privileges Required Low
User interaction None
Vulnerable System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality None
Integrity Low
Availability None
Subsequent System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality None
Integrity None
Availability None

CVSS v4 base metrics

Exploitability Metrics
Attack Vector: This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible. This metric value (and consequently the resulting severity) will be larger the more remote (logically, and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerable system. The assumption is that the number of potential attackers for a vulnerability that could be exploited from across a network is larger than the number of potential attackers that could exploit a vulnerability requiring physical access to a device, and therefore warrants a greater severity.
Attack Complexity: This metric captures measurable actions that must be taken by the attacker to actively evade or circumvent existing built-in security-enhancing conditions in order to obtain a working exploit. These are conditions whose primary purpose is to increase security and/or increase exploit engineering complexity. A vulnerability exploitable without a target-specific variable has a lower complexity than a vulnerability that would require non-trivial customization. This metric is meant to capture security mechanisms utilized by the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: This metric captures the prerequisite deployment and execution conditions or variables of the vulnerable system that enable the attack. These differ from security-enhancing techniques/technologies (ref Attack Complexity) as the primary purpose of these conditions is not to explicitly mitigate attacks, but rather, emerge naturally as a consequence of the deployment and execution of the vulnerable system.
Privileges Required: This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess prior to successfully exploiting the vulnerability. The method by which the attacker obtains privileged credentials prior to the attack (e.g., free trial accounts), is outside the scope of this metric. Generally, self-service provisioned accounts do not constitute a privilege requirement if the attacker can grant themselves privileges as part of the attack.
User interaction: This metric captures the requirement for a human user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable system. This metric determines whether the vulnerability can be exploited solely at the will of the attacker, or whether a separate user (or user-initiated process) must participate in some manner.
Vulnerable System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality: This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information managed by the VULNERABLE SYSTEM due to a successfully exploited vulnerability. Confidentiality refers to limiting information access and disclosure to only authorized users, as well as preventing access by, or disclosure to, unauthorized ones.
Integrity: This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information. Integrity of the VULNERABLE SYSTEM is impacted when an attacker makes unauthorized modification of system data. Integrity is also impacted when a system user can repudiate critical actions taken in the context of the system (e.g. due to insufficient logging).
Availability: This metric measures the impact to the availability of the VULNERABLE SYSTEM resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability. While the Confidentiality and Integrity impact metrics apply to the loss of confidentiality or integrity of data (e.g., information, files) used by the system, this metric refers to the loss of availability of the impacted system itself, such as a networked service (e.g., web, database, email). Since availability refers to the accessibility of information resources, attacks that consume network bandwidth, processor cycles, or disk space all impact the availability of a system.
Subsequent System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality: This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information managed by the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM due to a successfully exploited vulnerability. Confidentiality refers to limiting information access and disclosure to only authorized users, as well as preventing access by, or disclosure to, unauthorized ones.
Integrity: This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information. Integrity of the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM is impacted when an attacker makes unauthorized modification of system data. Integrity is also impacted when a system user can repudiate critical actions taken in the context of the system (e.g. due to insufficient logging).
Availability: This metric measures the impact to the availability of the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability. While the Confidentiality and Integrity impact metrics apply to the loss of confidentiality or integrity of data (e.g., information, files) used by the system, this metric refers to the loss of availability of the impacted system itself, such as a networked service (e.g., web, database, email). Since availability refers to the accessibility of information resources, attacks that consume network bandwidth, processor cycles, or disk space all impact the availability of a system.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

EPSS score

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

This score estimates the probability of this vulnerability being exploited within the next 30 days. Data provided by FIRST.
(38th percentile)

Weaknesses

Missing Authorization

The product does not perform an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-52828

GHSA ID

GHSA-rw46-qg69-vg6h

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.