Skip to content

Update versioning policy for editor integration - #12375

Merged
dhruvmanila merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
dhruv/versioning
Jul 18, 2024
Merged

dhruvmanila merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
dhruv/versioning

Conversation

@dhruvmanila

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

Following the stabilization of the Ruff language server, we need to update our versioning policy to account for any changes in it. This could be server settings, capability, etc.

This PR also adds a new section for the VS Code extension which is adopted from Biome's versioning policy for the same.

@dhruvmanila dhruvmanila added the documentation Improvements or additions to public-facing documentation label Jul 18, 2024
@dhruvmanila
dhruvmanila marked this pull request as ready for review July 18, 2024 10:50
Comment thread docs/versioning.md Outdated
@dhruvmanila

dhruvmanila commented Jul 18, 2024 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

I initially thought that adding a new capability shouldn't require a minor bump but maybe that's not true. What if we add completions and then when a user upgrades the Ruff version, the editor will start showing completions from Ruff, a lot of which might be duplicates from an existing language server.

Edit: I think for now this is fine.

@dhruvmanila
dhruvmanila requested a review from MichaReiser July 18, 2024 11:53
@MichaReiser
MichaReiser requested a review from zanieb July 18, 2024 12:10
Comment thread docs/versioning.md Outdated
Comment thread docs/versioning.md Outdated
Comment thread docs/versioning.md Outdated
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
@dhruvmanila
dhruvmanila enabled auto-merge (squash) July 18, 2024 15:16
@dhruvmanila
dhruvmanila merged commit 7953f6a into main Jul 18, 2024
@dhruvmanila
dhruvmanila deleted the dhruv/versioning branch July 18, 2024 15:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

documentation Improvements or additions to public-facing documentation

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants