Use dateutil for managing ISO8601 - #5232
Merged
Merged
Conversation
memsharded
approved these changes
May 28, 2019
memsharded
left a comment
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hopefully python-dateutil>2.6.0 won't be a blocker for users in old distros
Contributor
Author
|
Probably an older version is also ok... will act in that case. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Changelog: Bugfix: Fix
conan searchcommand showing revisions timestamps in a different time offset than UTC.Docs:omit
Previously I tried to avoid introducing a new dep (python-dateutil) for that but if we need to manage offsets, it is worth it.
Closes #5230
@PYVERS: Macos@py27, Windows@py36, Linux@py27, py34
@tags: svn, slow
@revisions: 1