Skip to content

[release/9.0] Fix IIS outofprocess to remove WebSocket compression handshake - #58931

Merged
wtgodbe merged 8 commits into
release/9.0from
backport/pr-58846-to-release/9.0
Nov 27, 2024
Merged

[release/9.0] Fix IIS outofprocess to remove WebSocket compression handshake#58931
wtgodbe merged 8 commits into
release/9.0from
backport/pr-58846-to-release/9.0

Conversation

@github-actions

@github-actions github-actions Bot commented Nov 13, 2024 •
edited by BrennanConroy
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport of #58846 to release/9.0

/cc @BrennanConroy

Fix IIS outofprocess to remove WebSocket compression handshake

Description

Blazor enabled websocket compression by default in some cases. IIS OutOfProcess is a hosting model some customers use and it is not compatible with websocket compression.

Fixes https://github.com/dotnet/AspNetCore-ManualTests/issues/2688

Customer Impact

Using IIS OutOfProcess with Blazor Server-side/Interactive will not work.

Regression?

  • Yes
  • No

Regression from 8.0

Risk

  • High
  • Medium
  • Low

Added automated testing and did manual testing. Fix is fairly simple change.

Verification

  • Manual (required)
  • Automated

Packaging changes reviewed?

  • Yes
  • No
  • N/A

@ghost ghost added the area-networking Includes servers, yarp, json patch, bedrock, websockets, http client factory, and http abstractions label Nov 13, 2024
@dotnet-policy-service dotnet-policy-service Bot added this to the 9.0.x milestone Nov 13, 2024
@BrennanConroy BrennanConroy added the ask-mode This issue / PR is a patch candidate which we will bar-check internally before patching it. label Nov 13, 2024
@BrennanConroy BrennanConroy mentioned this pull request Nov 13, 2024
Closed
@lextm lextm mentioned this pull request Nov 14, 2024
Closed
@BrennanConroy BrennanConroy added Servicing-approved Shiproom has approved the issue and removed ask-mode This issue / PR is a patch candidate which we will bar-check internally before patching it. labels Nov 14, 2024
@dotnet-policy-service dotnet-policy-service Bot added the pending-ci-rerun When assigned to a PR indicates that the CI checks should be rerun label Nov 26, 2024
@wtgodbe wtgodbe removed the pending-ci-rerun When assigned to a PR indicates that the CI checks should be rerun label Nov 27, 2024
@wtgodbe

wtgodbe commented Nov 27, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/azp run

@azure-pipelines

azure-pipelines Bot commented Nov 27, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 3 pipeline(s).

Safia Abdalla @wtgodbe
Skip WebSocketOutOfProcessTests on Windows.Amd64.Server2022.Open (#59112
d086eec 
)

* Skip WebSocketOutOfProcessTests on Windows.Amd64.Server2022.Open

* Use if-def from base class

* Fix in-proc and remove attributes from abstract class
@wtgodbe
wtgodbe merged commit 401ae7c into release/9.0 Nov 27, 2024
@wtgodbe
wtgodbe deleted the backport/pr-58846-to-release/9.0 branch November 27, 2024 23:59
@dotnet-policy-service dotnet-policy-service Bot modified the milestones: 9.0.x, 9.0.1 Nov 28, 2024
This was referenced Jan 15, 2025
Merged
Merged
This was referenced Aug 24, 2026
Closed
Closed
Closed
This was referenced Sep 5, 2026
Closed
Open
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Open
Closed
This was referenced Sep 12, 2026
Closed
Merged
Open
Open
Closed
Open
Open
Closed
Open
Merged
Open
This was referenced Sep 21, 2026
Merged
Open
Open
Open
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@BrennanConroy BrennanConroy BrennanConroy approved these changes
@halter73 halter73 Awaiting requested review from halter73 halter73 is a code owner
@JamesNK JamesNK Awaiting requested review from JamesNK JamesNK is a code owner
@mgravell mgravell Awaiting requested review from mgravell

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

area-networking Includes servers, yarp, json patch, bedrock, websockets, http client factory, and http abstractions Servicing-approved Shiproom has approved the issue

Projects

None yet

Milestone

9.0.1

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@wtgodbe @BrennanConroy