Skip to content

Conversation

@nicknovitski
Copy link
Member

@nicknovitski nicknovitski commented Jun 20, 2025

Why

I was hoping this would be more accurate and consistent.

Test Plan

Codecov report from CI.

It looks like there are a few small changes here and there, and then the src/index.ts files were all added to coverage and marked as uncovered.

Copy link
Member Author

nicknovitski commented Jun 20, 2025

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 20, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 97.39%. Comparing base (64057b6) to head (88dc7f5).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #300      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   97.89%   97.39%   -0.51%     
==========================================
  Files          77       87      +10     
  Lines        1903    11889    +9986     
  Branches      254      554     +300     
==========================================
+ Hits         1863    11579    +9716     
- Misses         40      303     +263     
- Partials        0        7       +7     
Flag Coverage Δ
integration 97.39% <ø> (-0.51%) ⬇️
unittest 97.39% <ø> (-0.51%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@nicknovitski nicknovitski force-pushed the 06-20-chore_explicitly_list_files_to_collect_coverage_from branch from 13a1326 to 8573695 Compare June 20, 2025 21:14
@nicknovitski nicknovitski force-pushed the 06-20-chore_use_v8_coverage_provider branch from 9a898bf to 174d088 Compare June 20, 2025 21:14
@nicknovitski nicknovitski marked this pull request as ready for review June 20, 2025 21:34
@nicknovitski nicknovitski requested a review from wschurman as a code owner June 20, 2025 21:34
Copy link
Member

@wschurman wschurman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's ignore the barrel files (src/index.ts) files since there's nothing really to test. Otherwise this looks good.

@nicknovitski nicknovitski changed the base branch from 06-20-chore_explicitly_list_files_to_collect_coverage_from to graphite-base/300 June 23, 2025 22:45
@nicknovitski nicknovitski force-pushed the 06-20-chore_use_v8_coverage_provider branch from 174d088 to dd7f926 Compare June 23, 2025 22:47
@graphite-app graphite-app bot changed the base branch from graphite-base/300 to main June 23, 2025 22:47
@nicknovitski nicknovitski force-pushed the 06-20-chore_use_v8_coverage_provider branch 2 times, most recently from 45e17f6 to 5d61e92 Compare June 23, 2025 22:56
@nicknovitski nicknovitski force-pushed the 06-20-chore_use_v8_coverage_provider branch from 5d61e92 to 88dc7f5 Compare June 23, 2025 22:57
@nicknovitski nicknovitski merged commit 93d8480 into main Jun 23, 2025
3 of 4 checks passed
@nicknovitski nicknovitski deleted the 06-20-chore_use_v8_coverage_provider branch June 23, 2025 23:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants