This repository was archived by the owner on Feb 5, 2026. It is now read-only.
added field secondaryServiceToken - #7
Merged
Merged
Conversation
displague
self-requested a review
March 16, 2022 14:30
displague
reviewed
Mar 18, 2022
displague
approved these changes
Mar 18, 2022
displague
left a comment
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks good to me - thanks for updating the CHANGELOG too.
I left a non-blocking nitpic regarding testing.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
secondaryServiceTokenis required for redundant connection, since for now a service token can only be issued for a single port - connection pair, and unlike directly specifying an Equinix port, with service token it is not possible to reuse same one for both primary and secondary.