Skip to content

Give the Super Game Boy its own ToC chapter - #670

Merged
ISSOtm merged 1 commit into
gbdev:masterfrom
ISSOtm:sgb-chapter
Sep 13, 2026
Merged

ISSOtm merged 1 commit into
gbdev:masterfrom
ISSOtm:sgb-chapter

Conversation

@ISSOtm

@ISSOtm ISSOtm commented Sep 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Those pages hardly involve the MMIO, so it seems more appropriate to move those elsewhere; and, frankly, considering how many pages are in there, a new chapter seems warranted.

Those pages hardly involve the MMIO, so it seems more appropriate to move
those elsewhere; and, frankly, considering how many pages are in there,
a new chapter seems warranted.
@ISSOtm
ISSOtm requested a review from a team September 13, 2026 07:38
@ISSOtm ISSOtm added content Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request labels Sep 13, 2026

@avivace avivace left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

OK for me, we could also put all those pages in a 'sgb' subfolder to give prettier URLs and improve the organisation of the source folder

@ISSOtm

ISSOtm commented Sep 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

I agree! The downside is that then we are breaking backwards compat, and we can't leave 301s from the old pages (we can try bodging it with client-side redirects, but... ick.)

Ironically, Codeberg Pages has support for those, and @Rangi42 checked and found out that GitHub Pages appears to be the odd one out here, against Netlify, Cloudflare Pages, and now Grebedoc/Codeberg Pages.

Anyway, let's not get sidetracked, I'll open an issue for discussing the src/ structure cleanup outside of this PR.

@ISSOtm
ISSOtm merged commit 2fa6af6 into gbdev:master Sep 13, 2026
3 checks passed
@ISSOtm
ISSOtm deleted the sgb-chapter branch September 13, 2026 15:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

content Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants