file: add HasSection method#308
Merged
unknwon merged 3 commits intogo-ini:mainfrom Nov 30, 2021
bryanpedini:feature-HasSection
Merged
file: add HasSection method#308unknwon merged 3 commits intogo-ini:mainfrom bryanpedini:feature-HasSection
HasSection method#308unknwon merged 3 commits intogo-ini:mainfrom
bryanpedini:feature-HasSection
Conversation
copied implementation from section.go
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #308 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 88.13% 88.30% +0.16%
==========================================
Files 9 9
Lines 1357 1351 -6
==========================================
- Hits 1196 1193 -3
+ Misses 98 96 -2
+ Partials 63 62 -1 |
Member
|
https://github.com/go-ini/ini/releases/tag/v1.66.0 has been tagged for this merge. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
copied implementation from section.go
What problem should be fixed?
Feature proposal #271.
Have you added test cases to catch the problem?
Yes indeed (after seeing this question, but I digress).