Thanks for the scan, but closing this — not merging.

Why:

1. The proposed badge would damage first-impression conversion on a public repo currently in early 0→100-star growth mode. "50/100 — Use with Caution" on a real-Chromium browser-automation + MCP tool reads as scary to a developer scanning the README in 3 seconds. We're optimizing the README hero specifically for that audience right now.

2. The five critical findings are true-positive pattern matches but false-positive security concerns in the context of what OhMyPerf does:

   • child_process in apps/ide-vscode/src/extension.ts:1 and :32 — the VSCode extension spawns the ohmyperf CLI on demand. Spawning the bundled CLI is the entire purpose of the extension.
   • child_process in apps/extension-chrome/src/background.ts:788 — same shape: the Chrome extension shells out for browser launch.
   • child_process in packages/core/src/sourcemap-resolver.ts:11 — invokes source-map tooling to lift script URLs to repo paths.

   All three are documented capabilities a Chromium-driving perf tool requires by design. Flagging them as critical without considering the project's category (browser-automation runtime) generates noise, not signal.

3. No supply-chain audit, no taint-analysis explanation. A real security report on a project of this shape would weigh the actual attack surface (the npx -y @ohmyperf/cli install path, the published npm-scoped packages, the MCP server's tool surface) — none of which the scan addresses. The score reflects pattern frequency, not threat model.

If anh wants a security audit, em sẽ run our own (issue welcome). If SafeSkill the project wants to land on this repo organically, the path is: contribute a real finding (file an issue with a specific exploit chain), not auto-PR a marketing badge.

For now: closing + deleting the branch.

Em không có ill will toward SafeSkill — automated scans on public repos are fine — em chỉ không merge link-spam disguised as security signal on a repo trying to convert first-time visitors.

cc @NHONH