Skip to content

Fix link to RFC (parameter choice) - #2

Merged
jwsi merged 2 commits into
jwsi:masterfrom
FX-Wood:master
Jan 21, 2023
Merged

jwsi merged 2 commits into
jwsi:masterfrom
FX-Wood:master

Conversation

@FX-Wood

@FX-Wood FX-Wood commented Oct 27, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hey! I am making a hobby project and storing some passwords using argon. Thanks for making this implementation, it will be nice to use.

I noticed that your link to the argon2 RFC is broken for me (maybe because it's out of draft now?) and found a link that works (for me at least): https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9106.html

This IETF bloggish post How to read RFCs recommends using https://www.rfc-editor.org to read RFCs, that's why I chose this host to link to.

Comment thread README.md Outdated
- **encoding** : Encoding for the returned hash type ('raw', 'hex' or 'b64').

For assistance with parameter selection refer to the [draft RFC](https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-irtf-cfrg-argon2-10.txt), in particular "Chapter 4: Parameter Choice".
For assistance with parameter selection refer to the [draft RFC](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9106.html#section-4), in particular "Chapter 4: Parameter Choice".

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Notice that it's an anchor link to section 4, should the paragraph reflect this?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Either is fine, thank you for updating the documentation 👍

@FX-Wood FX-Wood changed the title Fix link to RFC parameter selection Fix link to RFC (parameter selection) Oct 27, 2022
@FX-Wood FX-Wood changed the title Fix link to RFC (parameter selection) Fix link to RFC (parameter choice) Oct 27, 2022
@jwsi
jwsi merged commit 64e3665 into jwsi:master Jan 21, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants