Skip to content

unavoidable spurious "exception in shielded future" logged if exception raised after shield cancelled #156321

Closed

Description

@minrk

Bug report

Bug description:

test case:

import asyncio

async def fail(t):
    await asyncio.sleep(1)
    raise ValueError("should be caught, not logged")

async def main():
    fut = asyncio.create_task(fail(1))
    try:
        await asyncio.wait_for(asyncio.shield(fut), timeout=0.5)
    except asyncio.TimeoutError:
        print("timeout, as expected")
    
    try:
        await fut
    except Exception as e:
        print("error caught and handled:", e)
    

if __name__ == "__main__":
    asyncio.run(main())

#134331 appears to have introduced a regression where _log_on_exception is added unconditionally and permanently on a future that has been shielded at some point, when the shield future is cancelled, rather than removing the handler when the shield future is done.

In the above code, a long-running future is created. shield It is awaited with a timeout using wait_for(shield(fut)). Since the future is not done, this completes and should leave us in a state just like we had an asyncio.sleep(0.5). However, instead when the future resolves, the error is logged, even though the exception is caught and handled:

> python3 test.py
timeout, as expected
ValueError exception in shielded future
future: <Task finished name='Task-2' coro=<fail() done, defined at /tmp/test.py:3> exception=ValueError('should be caught, not logged')>
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/tmp/test.py", line 5, in fail
    raise ValueError("should be caught, not logged")
ValueError: should be caught, not logged
error caught and handled: should be caught, not logged

as far as I can tell, the behavior is more correct if _log_on_exception is removed entirely, but I don't fully track #134331, so it may be solving a problem I don't see.

Maybe I'm missing something? Is there some assumption that the inner future should always be finished before the outer one unless something is wrong? That's what the logging behavior suggests to me.

This is a regression in 3.14. 3.13 and prior appear to have correct logging behavior for failure after shielding.

CPython versions tested on:

3.14

Operating systems tested on:

macOS

Linked PRs

Activity

  1. added
    type-bugAn unexpected behavior, bug, or error
    on Aug 24, 2026
  2. added
    stdlibStandard Library Python modules in the Lib/ directory
    on Aug 24, 2026
  3. carltongibson commented on Oct 1, 2026

    @carltongibson
    Contributor

    As well as various links to this issue and PR #156521, this seems to be the root of a report to Django.

    asgiref's SyncToAsync has await asyncio.shield(exec_coro), and on cancellation it propagates the cancel into the nested async_to_sync task, then re-awaits exec_coro. So the exception is retrieved, just a tick after _log_on_exception fires. Minimal repro:

    import asyncio
    from asgiref.sync import async_to_sync, sync_to_async
    
    async def view():
        await asyncio.sleep(1)
    
    async def main():
        task = asyncio.create_task(sync_to_async(lambda: async_to_sync(view)())())
        await asyncio.sleep(0.1)
        task.cancel()
        try:
            await task
        except asyncio.CancelledError:
            pass
        await asyncio.sleep(0.5)
    
    asyncio.run(main())

    On 3.14.4 this logs CancelledError exception in shielded future. With the PR #156521 change applied, it's silent.

    Looks like a candidate to backport to 3.14.

  4. minrk commented on Oct 1, 2026

    @minrk
    ContributorAuthor

    Yeah, I think it is generally not true that you can tell if an exception will be retrieved at the time _log_on_exception is called. It could be retrieved at an arbitrary later time, as long as there's still a handle on the task. I think this logging cannot be linked to the error time, it must be linked to the disposal of the reference, which I have no idea how to do.

    An alternative that might still fix the issue targeted by #134331 is to retrieve the exception silently (without logging). Upside: it prevents both warnings (spurious "exception in shielded future" and "exception not retrieved"). Downside: it potentially silences a warning (exception not retrieved) that is there for a reason.

    I do still think removing the log on cancel altogether is the right thing to do.

  5. added a commit that references this issue on Oct 2, 2026
  6. kumaraditya303 commented on Oct 2, 2026

    @kumaraditya303
    Contributor

    I agree, removing the logging altogether is correct thing to do.

  7. added a commit that references this issue on Oct 2, 2026
  8. moved this from Todo to Done in asyncioon Oct 2, 2026
  9. added a commit that references this issue on Oct 2, 2026
  10. added a commit that references this issue on Oct 10, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    stdlibStandard Library Python modules in the Lib/ directorytopic-asynciotype-bugAn unexpected behavior, bug, or error

    Projects

    • Status
      Done

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions