Skip to content

docs: illustrate the all-success job dependency gate - #2522

Open
tonyzedginidze wants to merge 1 commit into
rq:masterfrom
tonyzedginidze:codex/docs-multiple-dependencies
Open

docs: illustrate the all-success job dependency gate#2522
tonyzedginidze wants to merge 1 commit into
rq:masterfrom
tonyzedginidze:codex/docs-multiple-dependencies

Conversation

@tonyzedginidze

@tonyzedginidze tonyzedginidze commented Oct 11, 2026 •
edited by coderabbitai Bot
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hi, let me know if something like this is allowed. If no mention of svg website preferred, its fine I can also remove.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Clarified that a dependent job waits for all prerequisites to succeed, regardless of completion order, and does not automatically receive their return values.
    • Added a diagram showing the all-success requirement. The dependent job is enqueued only after its prerequisites succeed and still needs a worker to run.
    • Explained that failed prerequisites defer the dependent job by default. allow_failure=True permits failed prerequisites but does not skip prerequisites that are queued or running.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Oct 11, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review in Change Stack →

Note

Reviews paused

It looks like this branch is under active development. To avoid overwhelming you with review comments due to an influx of new commits, CodeRabbit has automatically paused this review. You can configure this behavior by changing the reviews.auto_review.auto_pause_after_reviewed_commits setting.

Use the following commands to manage reviews:

  • @coderabbitai resume to resume automatic reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a single review.

Use the checkboxes below for quick actions:

  • ▶️ Resume reviews
  • 🔍 Trigger review

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration
  • Configuration used: defaults
  • Review profile: CHILL
  • Plan: Advanced
  • Run ID: b1d1a148-fb8a-43f9-a0c0-53514c7832b7
📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b25ec6c and 93d2033.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
  • docs/img/job-dependencies.png is excluded by !**/*.png
  • docs/img/job-dependencies.svg is excluded by !**/*.svg
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/docs/index.md

Included review availability: This review used your included allowance. Your plan provides up to 10 included reviews per hour; 9 remain after this review.

📝 Walkthrough

The documentation explains when a job with multiple prerequisites becomes enqueued. It describes how failed prerequisites affect dependent jobs, what allow_failure=True accepts, and whether prerequisite return values transfer automatically.

Changes: Job dependency documentation

Layer / File(s) Summary
Document prerequisite completion rules
docs/docs/index.md		 The documentation explains that all prerequisites must finish successfully by default, regardless of completion order. It clarifies that prerequisite return values are not transferred automatically and that enqueuing does not mean a worker has picked up the job. With allow_failure=True, failed prerequisites are accepted, but queued or running prerequisites are not.

Priority: ⬇️ Low

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~5 minutes

Change: Other

Suggested reviewers: selwin

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to 93d20

No actionable merge-blocking risk was identified in this documentation-only change.

Pre-merge checks · Passed 5
Passed Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check Passed The title clearly and concisely describes the main documentation change: illustrating the all-success job dependency gate.
Docstring Coverage Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0…
Linked Issues check Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create a new PR
  • Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@tonyzedginidze
tonyzedginidze force-pushed the codex/docs-multiple-dependencies branch 2 times, most recently from a57e2fc to b25ec6c Compare October 13, 2026 07:17
@tonyzedginidze
tonyzedginidze force-pushed the codex/docs-multiple-dependencies branch from b25ec6c to 93d2033 Compare October 13, 2026 09:58
@selwin

selwin commented Oct 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Do you mind removing the SVG and replacing the PNG with JPG or WEBP file so the size is smaller?

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@tonyzedginidze @selwin