Skip to content

Conversation

@dyazincahya
Copy link

https://github.com/dyazincahya/awesome-nativescript

A curated list of awesome plugins, and resources for NativeScript.

By submitting this pull request I confirm I've read and complied with the below requirements 🖖

Please read it multiple times. I spent a lot of time on these guidelines and most people miss a lot.

Requirements for your pull request

  • Don't open a Draft / WIP pull request while you work on the guidelines. A pull request should be 100% ready and should adhere to all the guidelines when you open it. Instead use #2242 for incubation visibility.
  • Don't waste my time. Do a good job, adhere to all the guidelines, and be responsive.
  • You have to review at least 2 other open pull requests.
    Try to prioritize unreviewed PRs, but you can also add more comments to reviewed PRs. Go through the below list when reviewing. This requirement is meant to help make the Awesome project self-sustaining. Comment here which PRs you reviewed. You're expected to put a good effort into this and to be thorough. Look at previous PR reviews for inspiration. Just commenting “looks good” or simply marking the pull request as approved does not count! You have to actually point out mistakes or improvement suggestions. Comments pointing out lint violation are allowed, but does not count as a review.
  • You have read and understood the instructions for creating a list.
  • This pull request has a title in the format Add Name of List. It should not contain the word Awesome.
    • Add Swift
    • Add Software Architecture
    • Update readme.md
    • Add Awesome Swift
    • Add swift
    • add Swift
    • Adding Swift
    • Added Swift
  • Your entry here should include a short description of the project/theme of the list. It should not describe the list itself. The first character should be uppercase and the description should end in a dot. It should be an objective description and not a tagline or marketing blurb. It should not contain the name of the list.
    • - [iOS](…) - Mobile operating system for Apple phones and tablets.
    • - [Framer](…) - Prototyping interactive UI designs.
    • - [iOS](…) - Resources and tools for iOS development.
    • - [Framer](…)
    • - [Framer](…) - prototyping interactive UI designs
  • Your entry should be added at the bottom of the appropriate category.
  • The title of your entry should be title-cased and the URL to your list should end in #readme.
    • Example: - [Software Architecture](https://github.com/simskij/awesome-software-architecture#readme) - The discipline of designing and building software.
  • No blockchain-related lists.
  • The suggested Awesome list complies with the below requirements.

Requirements for your Awesome list

  • Has been around for at least 30 days.
    That means 30 days from either the first real commit or when it was open-sourced. Whatever is most recent.
  • Run awesome-lint on your list and fix the reported issues. If there are false-positives or things that cannot/shouldn't be fixed, please report it.
  • The default branch should be named main, not master.
  • Includes a succinct description of the project/theme at the top of the readme. (Example)
    • Mobile operating system for Apple phones and tablets.
    • Prototyping interactive UI designs.
    • Resources and tools for iOS development.
    • Awesome Framer packages and tools.
  • It's the result of hard work and the best I could possibly produce.
    If you have not put in considerable effort into your list, your pull request will be immediately closed.
  • The repo name of your list should be in lowercase slug format: awesome-name-of-list.
    • awesome-swift
    • awesome-web-typography
    • awesome-Swift
    • AwesomeWebTypography
  • The heading title of your list should be in title case format: # Awesome Name of List.
    • # Awesome Swift
    • # Awesome Web Typography
    • # awesome-swift
    • # AwesomeSwift
  • Non-generated Markdown file in a GitHub repo.
  • The repo should have awesome-list & awesome as GitHub topics. I encourage you to add more relevant topics.
  • Not a duplicate. Please search for existing submissions.
  • Only has awesome items. Awesome lists are curations of the best, not everything.
  • Does not contain items that are unmaintained, has archived repo, deprecated, or missing docs. If you really need to include such items, they should be in a separate Markdown file.
  • Includes a project logo/illustration whenever possible.
    • Either centered, fullwidth, or placed at the top-right of the readme. (Example)
    • The image should link to the project website or any relevant website.
    • The image should be high-DPI. Set it to a maximum of half the width of the original image.
    • Don't include both a title saying Awesome X and a logo with Awesome X. You can put the header image in a # (Markdown header) or <h1>.
  • Entries have a description, unless the title is descriptive enough by itself. It rarely is though.
  • Includes the Awesome badge.
    • Should be placed on the right side of the readme heading.
      • Can be placed centered if the list has a centered graphics header.
    • Should link back to this list.
  • Has a Table of Contents section.
    • Should be named Contents, not Table of Contents.
    • Should be the first section in the list.
    • Should only have one level of nested lists, preferably none.
    • Must not feature Contributing or Footnotes sections.
  • Has an appropriate license.
    • We strongly recommend the CC0 license, but any Creative Commons license will work.
      • Tip: You can quickly add it to your repo by going to this URL: https://github.com/<user>/<repo>/community/license/new?branch=main&template=cc0-1.0 (replace <user> and <repo> accordingly).
    • A code license like MIT, BSD, Apache, GPL, etc, is not acceptable. Neither are WTFPL and Unlicense.
    • Place a file named license or LICENSE in the repo root with the license text.
    • Do not add the license name, text, or a Licence section to the readme. GitHub already shows the license name and link to the full text at the top of the repo.
    • To verify that you've read all the guidelines, please comment on your pull request with just the word unicorn.
  • Has contribution guidelines.
    • The file should be named contributing.md. The casing is up to you.
    • It can optionally be linked from the readme in a dedicated section titled Contributing, positioned at the top or bottom of the main content.
    • The section should not appear in the Table of Contents.
  • All non-important but necessary content (like extra copyright notices, hyperlinks to sources, pointers to expansive content, etc) should be grouped in a Footnotes section at the bottom of the readme. The section should not be present in the Table of Contents.
  • Has consistent formatting and proper spelling/grammar.
    • The link and description are separated by a dash.
      Example: - [AVA](…) - JavaScript test runner.
    • The description starts with an uppercase character and ends with a period.
    • Consistent and correct naming. For example, Node.js, not NodeJS or node.js.
  • Does not use hard-wrapping.
  • Does not include a CI (e.g. GitHub Actions) badge.
    You can still use a CI for linting, but the badge has no value in the readme.
  • Does not include an Inspired by awesome-foo or Inspired by the Awesome project kinda link at the top of the readme. The Awesome badge is enough.

Go to the top and read it again.

@sampart
Copy link
Contributor

sampart commented Jul 7, 2025

👋 It looks like you've missed at least a couple of checklist items, including the one flagged by the CI failure.

Please could you re-review the checklist and make the necessary changes? Thanks

I also can't see any existing PRs that you've reviewed. I appreciate that this can be a difficult requirement since others often get in first with a review, and adding a detailed review involves finding a PR that requires one, but see what you can do.

@sindresorhus
Copy link
Owner

Thanks for making an Awesome list! 🙌

It looks like you didn't read the guidelines closely enough. I noticed multiple things that are not followed. Try going through the list point for point to ensure you follow it. I spent a lot of time creating the guidelines so I wouldn't have to comment on common mistakes, and rather spend my time improving Awesome.

@dyazincahya
Copy link
Author

I will try to fix it

@dyazincahya
Copy link
Author

unicorn

@sampart
Copy link
Contributor

sampart commented Jul 7, 2025

Well spotted about one of the missing items 🦄 . You've still got failing CI so I won't re-review until that's passing.

@dyazincahya
Copy link
Author

Well spotted about one of the missing items 🦄 . You've still got failing CI so I won't re-review until that's passing.

CI passed, unicorn

Co-authored-by: Sam Partington <sampart@github.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@sampart sampart left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for being responsive to feedback here ✨

@dyazincahya
Copy link
Author

Thanks for being responsive to feedback here ✨

Yeah, that is a good feedback 👍

Copy link
Contributor

@Mo-way Mo-way left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @dyazincahya
Still missing:

This pull request has a title in the format Add Name of List. It should not contain the word Awesome.

Also not sure about the "at the bottom" requirement.

@dyazincahya dyazincahya changed the title Add NativeScript Awesome Add NativeScript Jul 13, 2025
@dyazincahya
Copy link
Author

Hi @dyazincahya Still missing:

This pull request has a title in the format Add Name of List. It should not contain the word Awesome.

Also not sure about the "at the bottom" requirement.

image

Okay, I have renamed the pull request title.

@dyazincahya dyazincahya requested a review from Mo-way July 13, 2025 14:53
@Mo-way
Copy link
Contributor

Mo-way commented Jul 13, 2025

Okay, I have renamed the pull request title.

Good! No need for evidence image, I can see it :D

Also not sure about the "at the bottom" requirement.

I assume you put the entry where it is, instead of on the bottom, because the topic matches. Personally, I'd say it's fine, let's see what Sindre says.

@Mo-way
Copy link
Contributor

Mo-way commented Jul 13, 2025

I'm not into Javascript, so take it with a grain of salt:

Been looking at the list and the Plugins and Components section. It looks like they mostly point to the main nativescript repo.
Personally, I see no use in that. Just add one link to the nativescript plugins directory, adding a note that those plugins are of high quality (assuming they are). Then only add links to useful community plugins.

Same goes for components.

@dyazincahya
Copy link
Author

dyazincahya commented Jul 14, 2025

I'm not into Javascript, so take it with a grain of salt:

Been looking at the list and the Plugins and Components section. It looks like they mostly point to the main nativescript repo. Personally, I see no use in that. Just add one link to the nativescript plugins directory, adding a note that those plugins are of high quality (assuming they are). Then only add links to useful community plugins.

Same goes for components.

Thank you for the feedback!

Actually, many people may not realize that the plugins in the main NativeScript repository are grouped into a single monorepo, which makes them a bit difficult to discover individually. That’s why I’ve tried to categorize the plugins and components based on their functionality — to make them easier to find and use.

Just to briefly share a bit of NativeScript’s history as I understand it: NativeScript was originally developed by Telerik, which is part of the Progress company. Back then, many community members contributed by developing plugins to support the NativeScript ecosystem.

Around 2018–2019, NativeScript was officially handed over to the community — including the website, repositories, and ongoing development. Since then, the community has taken the lead in managing and evolving the project.

Since that transition, many plugins and components created by the community were moved into the main NativeScript and nativescript-community repositories, so they could be maintained in a more centralized and collaborative way. However, plugin curation and categorization are still somewhat limited. A few individuals or organizations actively maintain their own plugin repositories, but to my knowledge, they are relatively few.

Currently, there are two main repositories, both maintained by the community:

  • The main NativeScript repo, which focuses on core development (TypeScript and JavaScript).
  • The nativescript-community repo, which focuses on integrating NativeScript with modern frameworks like Vue, React, SolidJS, Svelte, and more.

@sampart sampart mentioned this pull request Jul 25, 2025
33 tasks
@sindresorhus sindresorhus force-pushed the main branch 3 times, most recently from 0abcf16 to 393b934 Compare September 17, 2025 06:26
@sindresorhus sindresorhus force-pushed the main branch 5 times, most recently from ded208d to 62ee821 Compare October 10, 2025 16:40
@sindresorhus
Copy link
Owner

JavaScript obfuscator - JavaScript Obfuscator is a powerful free obfuscator for JavaScript, containing a variety of features which provide protection for your source code. (Tutorial)

Description should not repeat the title


Some items are missing descriptions: https://github.com/dyazincahya/awesome-nativescript?tab=readme-ov-file#unit-testing

@dyazincahya
Copy link
Author

JavaScript obfuscator - JavaScript Obfuscator is a powerful free obfuscator for JavaScript, containing a variety of features which provide protection for your source code. (Tutorial)

Description should not repeat the title

Some items are missing descriptions: https://github.com/dyazincahya/awesome-nativescript?tab=readme-ov-file#unit-testing

Done, I've fix it

image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants