Add reusable privacy-reviewed model evaluations - #170
Draft
srkirkland wants to merge 1 commit into
Draft
srkirkland wants to merge 1 commit into
srkirkland wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Contributor
|
Important Draft PR not reviewedDraft PRs are not automatically reviewed by default.
To automatically review draft PRs, update your CodeRabbit configuration: reviews:
auto_review:
drafts: trueComment |
This branch has not been deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
PolicyWonk model changes need a repeatable comparison against real questions. Add a small offline runner that samples recent saved production questions, requires local privacy review, freezes the app's actual retrieval context, and compares model/reasoning settings without writing to production.
The runner provides resumable generation and blinded judging, a cumulative cost cap, US-endpoint enforcement, citation checks, latency/token/cost metrics, reversed-order judge checks, and a self-contained HTML report. Production data and private reports stay outside Git; the PR includes only synthetic cases and aggregate results.
The initial 100-production-question plus 10-edge-case comparison favors keeping gpt-5.2 under the current prompt. Terra is roughly twice as fast but loses more grounded-answer comparisons; uncached answer costs are nearly equal. The aggregate results also document missing Knowledge Base content and limitations of the automated judge. No application model setting or deployment changes are included.
Validation: